Fabrication of activated coconut shell charcoal and titanium dioxide nanoparticle composite counter electrode for quantum dot sensitized solar cells by doctor blade technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Z. Pan, H. Rao, I. Mora-Seró, J. Bisquert, X. Zhong, Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 7659–7702 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00431E10.1039/C8CS00431E ↗
2. G. Shilpa, P.M. Kumar, D.K. Kumar, P.R. Deepthi, V. Sadhu, A. Sukhdev et al., Recent advances in the development of high efficiency quantum dot sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs): a review. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 6, 533–46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2023.05.00110.1016/j.mset.2023.05.001 ↗
3. M.A. Halim, Harnessing sun’s energy with quantum dots based next generation solar cell. Nanomaterials. 3, 22–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano301002210.3390/nano3010022 ↗
4. A. Sahu, A. Garg, A. Dixit, A review on quantum dot sensitized solar cells: past, present and future towards carrier multiplication with a possibility for higher efficiency. Sol. Energy 203, 210–39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.04410.1016/j.solener.2020.04.044 ↗
5. G.K.R. Senadeera, W.I. Sandamali, J.M.K.W. Kumari, T. Jaseetharan, J. Weerasinghe, P. Sonar et al., Morphological and structural study on low cost SnO2 counter electrode and its applications in quantum dot sensitized solar cells with polysulfide electrolyte. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 286, 116075 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11607510.1016/j.mseb.2022.116075 ↗
6. I. Mora-Seró, S. Giménez, F. Fabregat-Santiago, R. Gómez, Q. Shen, T. Toyoda et al., Recombination in quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1848–57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900134d10.1021/ar900134d ↗
7. S. Wang, J. Tian, Recent advances in counter electrodes of quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 6, 90082–99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra19226b10.1039/c6ra19226b ↗
8. M. Chu, Z. Du, Y. Zhang, L. Li, S. Jiao, F. Azad et al., Enhanced photovoltaic performance of quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells using Graphene/Cu2-xSe composite counter electrode. J. Alloys Compd. 851, 156869 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15686910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156869 ↗
9. B. Van Thang, H.T. Tung, D.H. Phuc, T.P. Nguyen, T. Van Man, L.Q. Vinh, High-efficiency quantum dot sensitized solar cells based on flexible rGO-Cu2S electrodes compared with PbS, CuS, Cu2S CEs. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 250, 112042 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11204210.1016/j.solmat.2022.112042 ↗
10. W. Li, S. Zhang, Q. Chen, Q. Zhong, Highly-dispersed CoS2/N-doped carbon nanoparticles anchored on RGO skeleton as a hierarchical composite counter electrode for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Chem. Eng. J. 430, 132732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13273210.1016/j.cej.2021.132732 ↗
11. W. Li, G. Long, Q. Chen, Q. Zhong, High-efficiency layered sulfur-doped reduced graphene oxide and carbon nanotube composite counter electrode for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources 430, 95–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.020 ↗
12. X. Zou, Z. Sun, Z. Du, Metal-chalcogenides nanocomposites as counter electrodes for quantum dots sensitized solar cells (LTD, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18809-1.00010-910.1016/B978-0-443-18809-1.00010-9 ↗
13. M.A.K.L. Dissanayake, A.K. Karunaratne, G.K.R. Senadeera, T.M.W.J. Bandara, G.R.A. Kumara, A.D.T. Medagedara et al., Sustainable coconut shell charcoal counter electrodes for efficiency enhancement in CdS quantum dot solar cells. Ionics (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-025-06118-210.1007/s11581-025-06118-2 ↗
14. C. Hunsur Ravikumar, S. Ramu, S. Mohan, R.G. Balakrishna, MoSe2 nanoflowers as a counter electrode for quantum dots sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 33, 12201–9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-08180-210.1007/s10854-022-08180-2 ↗
15. B.B. Jin, H.S. Huang, S.Y. Kong, G.Q. Zhang, B. Yang, C.X. Jiang et al., Antimony tin oxide/lead selenide composite as efficient counter electrode material for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 598, 492–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.07310.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.073 ↗
16. P.S. Tamboli, M.B.R. Prasad, V.S. Kadam, R.S. Vhatkar, H.M. Inamuddin, Pathan et al., α-MoO3-C composite as counter electrode for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy Mater. Sol Cells. 161, 96–101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.11.03510.1016/j.solmat.2016.11.035 ↗
17. M. Zhen, F. Li, R. Liu, C. Song, L. Xu, X.Z. Luo, MoS2-graphene hybrids as efficient counter electrodes in CdS quantum-dot sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 340, 120–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.03.02110.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.03.021 ↗
18. A. Hessein, A.A. El-Moneim, Synthesis of copper sulfide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for use as the counter electrodes of high-performance CdS-sensitized solar cells. Xinxing Tan Cailiao/New Carbon Mater 33, 26–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-5805(18)60324-510.1016/s1872-5805(18)60324-5 ↗
19. S. Sajjad, M.H. Sayyad, N. Khan, T. Manzoor, N. Nasr, R.A. Toor et al., Comparative photovoltaic and impedance spectroscopic study on carbon counter electrode based CdS quantum dot sensitized solar cell using polysulfide and iodide/triiodide as redox liquid electrolytes. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 273, 115437 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.11543710.1016/j.mseb.2021.115437 ↗
20. S. Monika, M. Mahalakshmi, N. Subha, M.S. Pandian, P. Ramasamy, Graphene quantum dots and CuS microflowers anchored rGO composite counter electrode for the enhanced performance of quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Diam. Relat. Mater. 125, 109033 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10903310.1016/j.diamond.2022.109033 ↗
21. A. Jain, S.K. Tripathi, Fabrication and characterization of energy storing supercapacitor devices using coconut shell based activated charcoal electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 183, 54–60 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2013.12.00410.1016/j.mseb.2013.12.004 ↗
22. P. Sinha, S. Banerjee, K.K. Kar, Characteristics of Activated Carbon BT - Handbook of Nanocomposite Supercapacitor Materials I: Characteristics, ed. by K.K. Kar (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020), pp. 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43009-2_410.1007/978-3-030-43009-2_4 ↗
23. N. Basha, T. Rathinavel, H. Sridharan, Activated Carbon from Coconut Shell: Synthesis and Its Commercial Applications-A Recent Review. Appl. Sci. Eng. Prog. (2022). https://doi.org/10.14416/j.asep.2022.07.00110.14416/j.asep.2022.07.001 ↗
24. N.A. Anuwar, P.F.M. Khamaruddin, Optimization of Chemical Activation Conditions for Activated Carbon From Coconut Shell Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Its Ability to Adsorb CO 2 2021;200:234–248. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.201229.03210.2991/aer.k.201229.032 ↗
25. M. Paputungan, N. Suleman, Y.R. Yunus, Adsorption power of activated charcoal from coconut shells on lead metal (Pb) in well water. J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA 9, 9270–9277 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.438710.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4387 ↗
26. E.H. Sujiono, D. Zabrian, Z.V. Zurnansyah, Mulyati, Samnur et al., Fabrication and characterization of coconut shell activated carbon using variation chemical activation for wastewater treatment application. Results Chem. 4, 100291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.10029110.1016/j.rechem.2022.100291 ↗
27. A.D.T. Medagedara, N.M. Waduge, T.M.W.J. Bandara, I.G.K.J. Wimalasena, M. Dissanayake, K. Tennakone et al., Triethylammonium thiocyanate ionic liquid electrolyte-based supercapacitor fabricated using coconut shell-derived electronically conducting activated charcoal electrode material. J. Energy Storage (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.10562810.1016/j.est.2022.105628 ↗
28. S.A. Ahmad, M.Z.U. Shah, S.U. Rahman, M. Arif, J. Lu, T. Huang et al., Facile synthesis of hierarchical ZnS@FeSe2 nanostructures as new energy-efficient cathode material for advanced asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Sci.: Adv. Mater. Devices 7, 100489 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2022.10048910.1016/j.jsamd.2022.100489 ↗
29. A. Ajien, J. Idris, N. Md Sofwan, R. Husen, H. Seli, Coconut shell and husk biochar: a review of production and activation technology, economic, financial aspect and application. Waste Manag. Res. 41, 37–51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X22112716710.1177/0734242X221127167 ↗
30. M. Borghei, N. Laocharoen, E. Kibena-Põldsepp, L.S. Johansson, J. Campbell, E. Kauppinen et al., Porous N,P-doped carbon from coconut shells with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction: alternative to Pt-C for alkaline fuel cells. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 204, 394–402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.02910.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.029 ↗
31. C.-Y. Hsu, Z.H. Mahmoud, S. Abdullaev, F.K. Ali, Y. Ali Naeem, R. Mzahim Mizher et al., Nano titanium oxide (nano-TiO2): a review of synthesis methods, properties, and applications. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 9, 100626 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.10062610.1016/j.cscee.2024.100626 ↗
32. X. Yan, X. Chen, Titanium dioxide Nanomaterials. Encycl Inorg. Bioinorg. Chem. 1–38 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119951438.eibc233510.1002/9781119951438.eibc2335 ↗
33. D.A.S. Mulus, M.D. Permana, Y. Deawati, D.R. Eddy, A current review of TiO2 thin films: synthesis and modification effect to the mechanism and photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 27, 100746 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2025.10074610.1016/j.apsadv.2025.100746 ↗
34. N. Seman, Z. Ahmad Tarmizi, R. Rasit Ali, S. Taib, M.S.N. Salleh, J. Zhe et al., Preparation Method of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles and Its Application: An Update. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1091, 12064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1091/1/01206410.1088/1755-1315/1091/1/012064 ↗
35. T. Mao, J. Zha, Y. Hu, Q. Chen, J. Zhang, X. Luo, Research progress of TIO2 modification and photodegradation of organic pollutants. Inorganics 12, 178 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics1207017810.3390/inorganics12070178 ↗
36. J. Matos, J.-M. Chovelon, T. Cordero, C. Ferronato, Influence of surface properties of activated carbon on photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in 4-chlorophenol degradation. Open Environ. Eng. J. 2, 21–9 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2174/187482950090201002110.2174/1874829500902010021 ↗
37. L. Andronic, A. Enesca, C. Cazan, M. Visa, TiO2-active carbon composites for wastewater photocatalysis. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 71, 396–405 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-014-3393-610.1007/s10971-014-3393-6 ↗
38. G.C. Patil, Doctor Blade: A Promising Technique for Thin Film Coating (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0961-2/1210.1007/978-981-99-0961-2/12 ↗
39. S.S. Shah, F. Niaz, M.A. Ehsan, H.T. Das, M. Younas, A.S. Khan et al., Advanced strategies in electrode engineering and nanomaterial modifications for supercapacitor performance enhancement: a comprehensive review. J. Energy Storage 79, 110152 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.11015210.1016/j.est.2023.110152 ↗
40. J. Cheng, F. Liu, Z. Tang, Y. Li, Scalable blade coating: a technique accelerating the commercialization of perovskite-based photovoltaics. Energy Technol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20210020410.1002/ente.202100204 ↗
41. K.D.M.S.P.K. Kumarasinghe, G.R.A. Kumara, R.M.G. Rajapakse, D.N. Liyanage, K. Tennakone, Activated coconut shell charcoal based counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Org. Electron. 71, 93–7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.00910.1016/j.orgel.2019.05.009 ↗
42. N. Qutub, P. Singh, S. Sabir, S. Sagadevan, W.C. Oh, Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of Acid Blue dye using CdS/TiO2 nanocomposite. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09479-010.1038/s41598-022-09479-0 ↗
43. N.T. My Hanh, H.T. Tung, N.T.K. Duyen, V.C. Nguyen, L. Van Hieu, N.T. Nguyen et al., Effect of hydrothermal time on catalyst activity of counter electrode Cu2S-rGO composite to enhance the efficiency of quantum dot solar cells. Ceram. Int. 50, 27127–38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.01010.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.010 ↗
44. M.A. Basit, M. Aanish Ali, Z. Masroor, Z. Tariq, J.H. Bang, Quantum dot-sensitized solar cells: a review on interfacial engineering strategies for boosting efficiency. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 120, 1–26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2022.12.01610.1016/j.jiec.2022.12.016 ↗
45. N.D. Johari, Z.M. Rosli, J.M. Juoi, S.A. Yazid, Comparison on the TiO2 crystalline phases deposited via dip and spin coating using green sol-gel route. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8, 2350–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.01810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.018 ↗
46. B. Lafuente, R.T. Downs, H. Yang, N. Stone, The power of databases: The RRUFF project (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110417104-00310.1515/9783110417104-003 ↗
47. J. Fayos, Possible 3D carbon structures as progressive intermediates in graphite to diamond phase transition. J. Solid State Chem. 148, 278–285 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1999.844810.1006/jssc.1999.8448 ↗
48. P. Serp, Carbon, vol. 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097774-4.00731-210.1016/B978-0-08-097774-4.00731-2 ↗
49. J. Kodali, S. Talasila, B. Arunraj, R. Nagarathnam, Activated coconut charcoal as a super adsorbent for the removal of organophosphorous pesticide monocrotophos from water. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 3, 100099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2021.10009910.1016/j.cscee.2021.100099 ↗
50. S.M. Lee, S.H. Lee, J.S. Roh, Analysis of activation process of carbon black based on structural parameters obtained by XRD analysis. Crystals 11, 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1102015310.3390/cryst11020153 ↗
51. W.H. Bragg, W.L. Bragg, The reflection of X-rays by crystals. Proc R Soc London Ser A, Contain Pap a Math Phys Character 88, 428–38 (1913). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1913.004010.1098/rspa.1913.0040 ↗
52. N.M. Keppetipola, M. Dissanayake, P. Dissanayake, B. Karunarathne, M.A. Dourges, D. Talaga et al., Graphite-type activated carbon from coconut shell: a natural source for eco-friendly non-volatile storage devices. RSC Adv. 11, 2854–65 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09182k10.1039/d0ra09182k ↗
53. N. Iwashita, X-ray Powder Diffraction (Tsinghua University Press Limited., 2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805256-3.00002-710.1016/B978-0-12-805256-3.00002-7 ↗
54. S.M.H. Qaid, H.M. Ghaithan, H.S. Bawazir, A.F. Bin Ajaj, K.K. AlHarbi, A.S. Aldwayyan, Successful growth of TiO2 nanocrystals with {001} facets for solar cells. Nanomaterials 13, 1–17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1305092810.3390/nano13050928 ↗
55. B. Anitha, M.A. Khadar, Anatase-rutile phase transformation and photocatalysis in peroxide gel route prepared TiO2 nanocrystals: role of defect states. Solid State Sci. 108, 106392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2020.10639210.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2020.106392 ↗
56. J. Zemann, Crystal structures,2nd edition. Vol. 1by R. W. G. Wyckoff, 196510.1107/S0365110X65000361 ↗
57. M. Sahadat Hossain, S. Ahmed, Easy and green synthesis of TiO2 (Anatase and Rutile): estimation of crystallite size using Scherrer equation, Williamson-Hall plot, Monshi-Scherrer Model, size-strain plot, Halder- Wagner Model. Results Mater. 20, 100492 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.10049210.1016/j.rinma.2023.100492 ↗
58. R.A. Spurr, H. Myers, Quantitative Analysis of Anatase-Rutile Mixtures with an X-Ray Diffractometer. 195710.1021/ac60125a006 ↗
59. I. Gregora, Chapter 2.3 Raman scattering. Int. Tables Crystallogr. 200610.1107/97809553602060000640 ↗
60. D.B. Schuepfer, F. Badaczewski, J.M. Guerra-Castro, D.M. Hofmann, C. Heiliger, B. Smarsly et al., Assessing the structural properties of graphitic and non-graphitic carbons by Raman spectroscopy. Carbon N Y 161, 359–72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.09410.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.094 ↗
61. Y. Wang, D.C. Alsmeyer, R.L. McCreery, Raman spectroscopy of carbon materials: structural basis of observed spectra. Chem. Mater. 2, 557–563 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00011a01810.1021/cm00011a018 ↗
62. P.R. Varadwaj, V.A. Dinh, Y. Morikawa, R. Asahi, Polymorphs of titanium dioxide: an assessment of the variants of projector augmented wave potential of titanium on their geometric and dielectric properties. ACS Omega 8, 22003–17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0203810.1021/acsomega.3c02038 ↗
63. R. Sikora, Ab initio study of phonons in the rutile structure of TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 66, 1069–1073 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.01.00710.1016/j.jpcs.2005.01.007 ↗
64. A. Sacco, L. Mandrile, L.L. Tay, N. Itoh, A. Raj, A. Moure et al., Quantification of titanium dioxide (TiO2) anatase and rutile polymorphs in binary mixtures by raman spectroscopy: an interlaboratory comparison. Metrologia (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/acf76d10.1088/1681-7575/acf76d ↗
65. J.R. Dennison, M. Holtz, Raman spectroscopy of carbon materials. Spectrosc. (Santa Monica). 11, 38–46 (1996)
66. E. Skrzypek, First- and second-order raman spectra of carbonaceous material through successive contact and regional metamorphic events (Ryoke belt, SW Japan). Lithos 388–389, 106029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.10602910.1016/j.lithos.2021.106029 ↗
67. S. Reich, C. Thomsen, Raman spectroscopy of graphite. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 362, 2271–2288 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2004.145410.1098/rsta.2004.1454 ↗
68. I. Childres, L. Jauregui, W. Park, H. Caoa, Y.P. Chena, Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene and Related Materials. New. Dev. Phot Mater. Res. 2013:403–418
69. R.J. Nemanich, S.A. Solin, First- and second-order raman scattering from finite-size crystals of graphite. Phys Rev B 20, 392–401 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.20.39210.1103/PhysRevB.20.392 ↗
70. F. Tuinstra, J.L. Koenig, Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53, 1126–30 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.167410810.1063/1.1674108 ↗
71. A.C. Ferrari, J. Robertson, Interpretation of raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095–107 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
72. A. Culka, J. Jehlička, S. Opluštil, Evaluation of carbonification of coals using a portable raman spectrometer. J. Raman Spectrosc. 54, 1220–32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.652110.1002/jrs.6521 ↗
73. E. Rosson, P. Sgarbossa, M. Mozzon, F. Venturino, S. Bogialli, A. Glisenti et al., Novel correlations between spectroscopic and morphological properties of activated carbons from waste coffee grounds. Processes (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr909163710.3390/pr9091637 ↗
74. A. Lazzarini, A. Piovano, R. Pellegrini, G. Leofanti, G. Agostini, S. Rudić et al., A comprehensive approach to investigate the structural and surface properties of activated carbons and related Pd-based catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 4910–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cy00159a10.1039/c6cy00159a ↗
75. A.A. Memon, A.A. Arbab, I.A. Sahito, N. Mengal, K.C. Sun, M.B. Qadir et al., Facile fabrication of activated charcoal decorated functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube electro-catalyst for high performance quasi-solid state dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 234, 53–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.01810.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.018 ↗
76. M. Dumka, S. Juyal, A. Mishra, B. Prasad, A. Jain, P. Kumar et al., Capacitive attribute of vanadium-oxide embedded activated charcoal composite. Surfaces and Interfaces 51, 104724 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10472410.1016/j.surfin.2024.104724 ↗
77. A. Ghosh, C. do A, A. Dasgupta, K. Fujisawa, L.H.S. Vieira, S. Subramanian et al., Structural and electrochemical properties of babassu coconut mesocarp-generated activated carbon and few-layer graphene. Carbon 145, 175–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.11410.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.114 ↗
78. P.K. Mubari, T. Beguerie, M. Monthioux, E. Weiss-Hortala, A. Nzihou, P. Puech, The X-ray, raman and TEM signatures of cellulose-derived carbons explained. C (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/c801000410.3390/c8010004 ↗
79. F.A. Stevie, C.L. Donley, Introduction to x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films (2020). https://doi.org/10.1116/6.000041210.1116/6.0000412 ↗
80. J.F. Moulder, J. Chastain, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data (Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corporation;, 1992)
81. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 20, National Institute of Standards and Technology, M.D. Gaithersburg, 20899 2000. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4T88K10.18434/T4T88K ↗
82. T.F. Qahtan, T.O. Owolabi, T.A. Saleh, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of surface-treated TiO2 mesoporous film by 500 eV argon ion beam. J. Mol. Liq. 393, 123556 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.12355610.1016/j.molliq.2023.123556 ↗
83. B. Bharti, S. Kumar, H.N. Lee, R. Kumar, Formation of oxygen vacancies and Ti3 + state in TiO2 thin film and enhanced optical properties by air plasma treatment. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3235510.1038/srep32355 ↗
84. W. Liu, B. Wang, M. Zhang, Effect of process parameters on the microstructure and performance of TiO2-loaded activated carbon. ACS Omega 6, 35076–35092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0583310.1021/acsomega.1c05833 ↗
85. J. I, M.S. A, V. B, KOH-mediated structural modification of activated charcoal by heat treatment for the efficient adsorption of organic dyes. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 19, 100566 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.10056610.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100566 ↗
86. M. Punon, W. Jarernboon, P. Laokul, Electrochemical performance of Palmyra palm shell activated carbon prepared by carbonization followed by microwave reflux treatment. Mater. Res. Express 9, 65603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac76a310.1088/2053-1591/ac76a3 ↗
87. J. Han, Q. Li, J. Wang, J. Ye, G. Fu, L. Zhai et al., Heteroatoms (O, N)-doped porous carbon derived from bamboo shoots shells for high performance supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 20991–1001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-0244-110.1007/s10854-018-0244-1 ↗
88. C. Breen, G. Thompson, M. Webb, Preparation, thermal stability and decomposition routes of clay/Triton- X100 composites. J. Mater. Chem. 9, 3159–65 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1039/a907860f10.1039/a907860f ↗
89. K.J. Voorhees, S.F. Baugh, D.N. Stevenson, An investigation of the thermal degradation of poly(ethylene glycol). J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 30, 47–57 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2370(94)00803-510.1016/0165-2370(94)00803-5 ↗
90. C. Berberidou, G.Z. Kyzas, I. Paspaltsis, T. Sklaviadis, I. Poulios, Photocatalytic disinfection and purification of water employing reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 composites. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 94, 3905–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.618810.1002/jctb.6188 ↗
91. J. Soria, J. Sanz, I. Sobrados, J.M. Coronado, A.J. Maira, M.D. Hernández-Alonso et al., FTIR and NMR study of the adsorbed water on nanocrystalline anatase. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 10590–6 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp071440g10.1021/jp071440g ↗
92. P. Praveen, G. Viruthagiri, S. Mugundan, N. Shanmugam, Structural, optical and morphological analyses of pristine titanium di-oxide nanoparticles - synthesized via sol-gel route. Spectrochim. Acta. - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 117, 622–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.09.03710.1016/j.saa.2013.09.037 ↗
93. S. Briche, M. Derqaoui, M. Belaiche, E.M. El Mouchtari, P. Wong-Wah-Chung, S. Rafqah, Nanocomposite material from TiO2 and activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceutical product sulfamethazine by combined adsorption/photocatalysis in aqueous media. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 25523–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08939-210.1007/s11356-020-08939-2 ↗
94. R.A. Arias-Niquepa, J.J. Prías-Barragán, H. Ariza-Calderón, M.E. Rodríguez-García, Activated carbon obtained from bamboo: synthesis, morphological, vibrational, and electrical properties and possible temperature sensor. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 216, 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20180042210.1002/pssa.201800422 ↗
95. M. Ilić, F.H. Haegel, A. Lolić, Z. Nedić, T. Tosti, I.S. Ignjatović et al., Surface functional groups and degree of carbonization of selected chars from different processes and feedstock. PLoS One (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.027736510.1371/journal.pone.0277365 ↗
96. S. Mopoung, N. Dejang, Activated carbon preparation from eucalyptus wood chips using continuous carbonization–steam activation process in a batch intermittent rotary kiln. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93249-x10.1038/s41598-021-93249-x ↗
97. A. Stenny Winata, H. Devianto, R. Frida Susanti, Synthesis of activated carbon from salacca peel with hydrothermal carbonization for supercapacitor application. Mater. Today Proc. 44, 3268–3272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.51510.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.515 ↗
98. I. Hwang, K. Yong, Counter electrodes for quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. ChemElectroChem 2, 634–653 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20140240510.1002/celc.201402405 ↗
99. K.E. Jasim, Quantum Dots Solar Cells. Sol Cells - New. Approaches Rev. (2015). https://doi.org/10.5772/5915910.5772/59159 ↗
100. Z. Du, Z. Pan, F. Fabregat-Santiago, K. Zhao, D. Long, H. Zhang et al., Carbon counter-electrode-based quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells with certified efficiency exceeding 11%. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 3103–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0135610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01356 ↗