Improving etchability and imaging performance of EUV mask absorber materials via ion implantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Burkhardt, A. Raghunathan, Best focus shift mechanism for thick masks, EUV Lithography VI, Proc. SPIE 9422, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.208594810.1117/12.2085948 ↗
2. Q. Wang, Q. Wu, Y. Li, X. Liu, Y. Li, Patterning fidelity enhancement and aberration mitigation in EUV lithography through source–mask optimization. Micromachines 16, 1166 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1610116610.3390/mi16101166 ↗
3. V. Philipsen, A. Frommhold, D. Thakare, G. Libeert, I. Lee, J.H. Franke, J. Bekaert, L. Van Look, N. Pellens, P. De Bisschop, R. Jonckheere, T. Kovalevich, V. Wiaux, E. Hendrickx, Mask innovations on the eve of high NA EUV lithography. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 040804 (2024). https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/ad38c710.35848/1347-4065/ad38c7 ↗
4. Y. Kim, D. Jeong, S. Lee, T. Lee, J. Ahn, Pt-W alloy absorbers for high-NA EUV lithography: tunable optical and etching performance. Nanotechnology (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/adf8f510.1088/1361-6528/adf8f5 ↗
5. C.J. McHargue, J.D. Hunn, D.L. Joslin, E. Alves, M.F. da Silva, J.C. Soares, Etching of amorphous Al2O3 produced by ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 127–128, 596–598 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(96)01139-110.1016/S0168-583X(96)01139-1 ↗
6. R. Charavel, J.P. Raskin, Tuning of etching rate by implantation: Silicon, polysilicon and oxide, in: AIP Conf. Proc., American Institute of Physics 866 (2006) 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.240152310.1063/1.2401523 ↗
7. X. Sun, Q. Lu, H. Takeuchi, S. Balasubramanian, T.J. King Liu, Selective enhancement of SiO2 etch rate by Ar-ion implantation for improved etch depth control. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 10, D89 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.274863410.1149/1.2748634 ↗
8. S. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Lv, J. Cheng, Surface modification of polymers by ion irradiation: reactivity principle and application. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 543, 165097 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2023.16509710.1016/j.nimb.2023.165097 ↗
9. B. Shen, D. Hu, C. Dai, X. Yu, X. Tan, J. Sun, J. Jiang, A. Jiang, Advanced etching techniques of LiNbO3 nanodevices. Nanomaterials 13, 2789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1320278910.3390/nano13202789 ↗
10. R. Burcea, J.F. Barbot, P.O. Renault, D. Eyidi, T. Girardeau, M. Marteau, F. Giovannelli, A. Zenji, J.M. Rampnoux, S. Delaire, P. Eklund, A. le Febvrier, Influence of generated defects by Ar implantation on the thermoelectric properties of ScN. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5, 11025–11033 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c0167210.1021/acsaem.2c01672 ↗
11. J.F. Ziegler, M.D. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, SRIM–the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 268, 1818–1823 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.09110.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
12. Z. Dou, Y. Guo, F. Zhang, D. Zhang, Effect of low-energy nitrogen ion implantation on friction and wear properties of ion-plated TiC coating. Coatings. 11, 775 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1107077510.3390/coatings11070775 ↗
13. M. Nunogaki, M. Uchida, Y. Kuratomi, K. Miyazaki, Surface roughness and sputtering yield of heavily ion implanted surfaces. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 37–38, 325–328 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(89)90196-110.1016/0168-583X(89)90196-1 ↗
14. V. Luong, V. Philipsen, E. Hendrickx, K. Opsomer, C. Detavernier, C. Laubis, F. Scholze, M. Heyns, Ni-Al alloys as alternative EUV mask absorber. Appl. Sci. 8, 521 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/app804052110.3390/app8040521 ↗
15. G. Greczynski, L. Hultman, Critical method evaluation refutes the Ar 2p signal of implanted Ar for referencing X-ray photoelectron spectra. Appl. Surf. Sci. 635, 157598 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15759810.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157598 ↗
16. H.B. Lee, Y.W. Kim, S.H. Kim, S.H. Park, J.P. Choi, C. Aranas Jr., A modular solder system with hierarchical morphology and backward compatibility. Small 14, 1801349 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20180134910.1002/smll.201801349 ↗
17. O. Tengstrand, N. Nedfors, M. Andersson, J. Lu, U. Jansson, A. Flink, P. Eklund, L. Hultman, Model for electron-beam-induced crystallization of amorphous Me – Si–C (Me = Nb or Zr) thin films. J. Mater. Res. 29, 2854–2862 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2014.34510.1557/jmr.2014.345 ↗
18. Y. Sun, S.Z. Diao, P.P. Liu, Q. Zhan, F.R. Wan, Anomalies in the calculation of dpa by using damage energy method based on full-cascades option of SRIM. Ann. Nucl. Energy 183, 109667 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2022.10966710.1016/j.anucene.2022.109667 ↗
19. P. Wang, F. Fang, Defect-mediated atomic layer etching processes on Cl–Si (100): an atomistic insight. J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 21106–21113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0537810.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05378 ↗
20. Z. Han, M. Vehkamäki, M. Mattinen, E. Salmi, K. Mizohata, M. Leskelä, M. Ritala, Selective etching of focused gallium ion beam implanted regions from silicon as a nanofabrication method. Nanotechnology 26, 265304 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/26/26530410.1088/0957-4484/26/26/265304 ↗
21. N. Fu, Y. Liu, X. Ma, Z. Chen, EUV lithography: state-of-the-art review. J. Microelectron. Manuf. 2, 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33079/jomm.1902020210.33079/jomm.19020202 ↗
22. L. Zou, Y. Sun, P. Wei, M. Yuan, Z. Li, L. Liu, Y. Li, Exposure latitude aware source and mask optimization for extreme ultraviolet lithography. Appl. Opt. 60, 9404–9410 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.44052810.1364/AO.440528 ↗