Tuning phase composition and morphology of calcium phosphate coatings on Ti6Al4V by pulse electrodeposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the influence of varying experimental parameters on the electrodeposition mechanism, phase composition, and morphology of calcium phosphate coatings synthesized by pulse electrodeposition on Ti6Al4V alloys. The objective is to optimize the pulse electrodeposition parameters to enhance the physicochemical properties of calcium phosphate coatings on Ti6Al4V alloys, aiming to improve bioactivity and osseointegration potential for biomedical applications. Cyclic voltammetry was used to elucidate the reaction mechanisms, while coatings were obtained under controlled pulsed potentials at two pH values (4.5 and 6.0) and three pulse ratios (t on /t off = 30/15, 60/30, and 120/60 seconds). The morphology, roughness, phase composition, and chemical structure of the coatings were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results revealed that pH and pulse duration have a substantial impact on the local electrochemical environment, influencing the phase composition (hydroxyapatite vs. brushite), surface roughness, and porosity. Coating produced at pH of 6 exhibited predominantly hydroxyapatite phases, whereas lower pH values led to biphasic compositions. The thickness and roughness of the coating showed a direct dependence on pulse duration. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of tailoring calcium phosphate coatings through pulse electrodeposition for enhanced biomedical performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Kumar, N. Bala, T.S. Bedi, J.S. Chohan, R. Kumar, Investigation on corrosion behaviour of HAp coating on biomaterial, Mater. Today Proc., no. May 2023, pp. 1–10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2024.03.04510.1016/j.matpr.2024.03.045 ↗
2. J. Pandey, S. Rajput, Orthopedic implants: necessity of coating, their advantages, and challenges. J. Bio- Tribo-Corros. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-025-00968-z10.1007/s40735-025-00968-z ↗
3. L. Kostelac et al., Investigation of hydroxyapatite (HAP) containing coating on grade 2 titanium alloy prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) at low voltage. Surf. Interfaces. 30, 101888 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.10188810.1016/j.surfin.2022.101888 ↗
4. Y. Liang, Y. Song, L. Wang, C. Wei, X. Zhou, Y. Feng, Research progress on antibacterial activity of medical titanium alloy implant materials. Odontology. 111(4), 813–829 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00832-x10.1007/s10266-023-00832-x ↗
5. R. Ahmadi, S. Izanloo, Development of HAp/GO/Ag coating on 316 LVM implant for medical applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 126(January), 105075 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10507510.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105075 ↗
6. L. Hernández, J.E. González, V. Barranco, Y. Veranes-Pantoja, J.C. Galván, G.R. Gattorno, Biomimetic hydroxyapatite (HAp) coatings on pure Mg and their physiological corrosion behavior. Ceram. Int. 48(1), 1208–1222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.20610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.206 ↗
7. M.K. Thu, Y.S. Kang, J.M. Kwak, Y.H. Jo, J.S. Han, I.S.L. Yeo, Comparison between bone–implant interfaces of microtopographically modified zirconia and titanium implants. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 1–10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38432-y10.1038/s41598-023-38432-y ↗
8. K. Gulati, Surface modification of titanium dental implants (2023)10.1007/978-3-031-21565-0 ↗
9. H. Ghodrati et al., A narrative review of recent developments in osseointegration and anti-corrosion of titanium dental implants with nano surface. Bone Rep. 25, 101846 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2025.10184610.1016/j.bonr.2025.101846 ↗
10. V. Melo-Soares, I. Gazott-Simões, A.C. Dos Reis, M.L. da C. Valente, Effect of surface pre-treatment with Er: YAG laser on hydroxyapatite coating adhesion and mechanical properties of titanium alloy discs. Lasers Med. Sci. 40(1), 130 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04347-510.1007/s10103-025-04347-5 ↗
11. R.B. Osman, M.V. Swain, A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials 8(3), 932–958 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma803093210.3390/ma8030932 ↗
12. A. Swalsky, S.S. Noumbissi, T.G. Wiedemann, The systemic and local interactions related to titanium implant corrosion and hypersensitivity reactions: a narrative review of the literature. Int. J. Implant Dent. 10(1), 58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00578-310.1186/s40729-024-00578-3 ↗
13. A.I.A. El-Hady, H.I. Eid, S.L. Mohamed, S.M. Fadl, Influence of titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy as implant materials on implant stability of maxillary implant retained overdenture: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 24(1), 902 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04692-x10.1186/s12903-024-04692-x ↗
14. M. Hosseini, J. Khalil-Allafi, M.S. Safavi, Plasma electrolytic oxidation deposited HAp-Ta2O5 composite coatings on Ti6Al4V for biomedical applications: the importance of Ta2O5 reinforcing phase. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 33, 4055–4066 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.08110.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.081 ↗
15. S. Kreve, A.C. dos Reis, Efficacy of electrical stimulation for antimicrobial capacity of titanium materials implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral Biosci. 67(2), 100669 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.job.2025.10066910.1016/j.job.2025.100669 ↗
16. S.M. Baligidad, A.C. Maharudresh, T. Arunkumar, K.N. Bharath, S. Abdullah, Investigation on performance of hybrid coating of hydroxyapatite and reduced graphene oxide on polyether ether ketone for orthopaedic application. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 9(2), 445–459 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00464-110.1007/s40964-023-00464-1 ↗
17. M. Chozhanathmisra, L. Murugesan, A. Murugesan, G. Palanisamy, R. Rajavel, Enhancement on physical, chemical, and biological properties of HNT-PVA-ALG-HAp biocomposite coating on implant substrate for biomedical application. Ceram. Int. 48(12), 16868–16876 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.24110.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.241 ↗
18. M. Jakubowski et al., Innovative coating strategies for titanium implants: combining epigallocatechin gallate, zinc ions, and ciprofloxacin to combat infection and promote osseointegration. Appl. Surf. Sci. 700, 163243 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16324310.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163243 ↗
19. A.H. Choi, B. Ben-Nissan, Calcium Phosphate BT - Calcium Phosphate Nanocoatings for Bone Regeneration (2023)10.1007/978-981-99-5506-0 ↗
20. T. Hanawa, Electrodeposition of calcium phosphates, oxides, and molecules to achieve biocompatibility of metals. Elsevier (2018)10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.11159-X ↗
21. J. Cheng et al., Biological characterization of the osteogenic, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties of fullerene-modified zirconia and titanium alloy implant surfaces. Diamond Relat. Mater. 155, 112339 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2025.11233910.1016/j.diamond.2025.112339 ↗
22. S.A. Pauline, K. Gopalsamy, R. Nallaiyan, Nanostructured Sr, Nb-incorporated TiO2 as an efficient orthopedic implant coating with superior bioactivity and corrosion resistance. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-10246-710.1007/s11665-024-10246-7 ↗
23. A. Shruthilaya, R. Gosala, R. Ramadoss, Electrophoretic deposition-assisted zirconia-glutathione coatings: a new frontier in titanium implant for enhanced osseointegration. Biomedical Materials & Devices (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-025-00318-010.1007/s44174-025-00318-0 ↗
24. T. Nguyen Viet et al., Synthesis of hydroxyapatite coating on acid-etched titanium via hydrothermal method for biomedical applications: effect of temperature, time, and pH factor. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 68(13), 1913–1921 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362360251910.1134/S0036023623602519 ↗
25. V. Kumar, C. Jolivalt, J. Pulpytel, R. Jafari, F. Arefi-Khonsari, Development of silver nanoparticle loaded antibacterial polymer mesh using plasma polymerization process. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3441910.1002/jbm.a.34419 ↗
26. A. Mitra, A. Mahanty, R. Kumar, D. Shikha, Microstructure, corrosion, dielectric, thrombogenicity, wettability and mechanical investigation of PMMA/HAp pellet and PMMA/HAp coating on Al2O3: a comparative study. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 33(13), 6791–6803 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08427-x10.1007/s11665-023-08427-x ↗
27. R. Ahmadi, N. Asadpourchallou, B.K. Kaleji, In vitro study: evaluation of mechanical behavior, corrosion resistance, antibacterial properties and biocompatibility of HAp/TiO2/Ag coating on Ti6Al4V/TiO2 substrate. Surfaces and Interfaces 24(March), 101072 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10107210.1016/j.surfin.2021.101072 ↗
28. C. Prakash, K. Kotecha, A. Pramanik, A. Basak, S. Shankar, Synthesis of functionalized HAp-surface on β-Ti alloy using ball-burnishing assisted EDC process for biomedical application. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 22(4), 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00510-910.1007/s43452-022-00510-9 ↗
29. F. Saji, I. Mobasherpour, L. Nikzad, M. Razavi, M.O. Shabani, Microstructural analysis and electrochemical behavior of functional gradient coating hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate on Ti-6Al-4 V by plasma spraying method. Braz. J. Phys. 53(6), 1–10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-023-01364-z10.1007/s13538-023-01364-z ↗
30. B.M. Murari, S.S. Chauhan, Characterisation of TEOS-based sol–gel-hydroxyapatite composite coating on titanium implants. Biomedical Materials & Devices 3(1), 496–503 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-024-00182-410.1007/s44174-024-00182-4 ↗
31. S. Prabakaran, K. Rohini, Evaluation of osteogenic potential of centella Asiatica extract @ hydroxyapatite based composite coating on titanium implant by dip coating method for orthopedic applications. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 61, 755–773 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-025-01150-x10.1007/s41779-025-01150-x ↗
32. S. Mahtabian, S.M. Mirhadi, N.H. Nemati, M. Sharifi, F. Tavangarian, Influence of biomimetic apatite coating on the biobehavior of TiO2 scaffolds. J. Bionic Eng. 21(4), 1975–1986 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-024-00547-x10.1007/s42235-024-00547-x ↗
33. R. Pani, R. Ranjan Behera, S. Roy, Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coating: a state of art. Materials Today: Proceedings 62, 4086–4093 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.63210.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.632 ↗
34. A.E. Doroshenko, V.K. Krut’ko, O.N. Musskaya, S.M. Rabchinsky, A.I. Kulak, Electrodeposition of calcium phosphate coatings in polyvinyl alcohol. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 14(3), 738–743 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207511332303012710.1134/S2075113323030127 ↗
35. L. Fathyunes, Impact of silica concentration on the calcium phosphate-based composite coatings prepared by pulsed co-electrodeposition. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 58(2), 116–124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S106837552202003X10.3103/S106837552202003X ↗
36. K.H. Park, H.J. Song, Y.J. Park, Calcium phosphate-chitosan coatings deposited on titanium surfaces via pulse galvanostatic electrodeposition for dental implants. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 15(10), 9611–9621 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.10.7310.20964/2020.10.73 ↗
37. R. Drevet, J. Fauré, S. Sayen, M. Marle-Spiess, H. El Btaouri, H. Benhayoune, Electrodeposition of biphasic calcium phosphate coatings with improved dissolution properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12179710.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121797 ↗
38. L. Fathyunes, J. Khalil-Allafi, S.O.R. Sheykholeslami, M. Moosavifar, Biocompatibility assessment of graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite coating applied on TiO2 nanotubes by ultrasound-assisted pulse electrodeposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 87, 10–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.01210.1016/j.msec.2018.02.012 ↗
39. D. Gopi, J. Indira, L. Kavitha, A comparative study on the direct and pulsed current electrodeposition of hydroxyapatite coatings on surgical grade stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 206(11–12), 2859–2869 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.12.01110.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.12.011 ↗
40. S. Li et al., Pulsed electrodeposition of MXenes/HAp multiple biological functional coatings on 3D printed porous Ti-6Al-4V bone tissue engineering scaffold. Surf. Coat. Technol. 464, 129532 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12953210.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129532 ↗
41. E. Vidal et al., Single-step pulsed electrodeposition of calcium phosphate coatings on titanium for drug delivery. Surf. Coatings Technol. 358(2018), 266–275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.03710.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.037 ↗
42. R. Drevet, H. Benhayoune, L. Wortham, S. Potiron, J. Douglade, D. Laurent-Maquin, Effects of pulsed current and H2O2 amount on the composition of electrodeposited calcium phosphate coatings. Mater. Charact. 61(8), 786–795 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2010.04.01610.1016/j.matchar.2010.04.016 ↗
43. R. Drevet, A. Viteaux, J.C. Maurin, H. Benhayoune, Human osteoblast-like cells response to pulsed electrodeposited calcium phosphate coatings. RSC Adv. 3(28), 11148–11154 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra23255g10.1039/c3ra23255g ↗
44. M. Logesh, S.G. Ahn, H.C. Choe, Comprehensive evaluation of MWCNT/HAp and Cu-functionalized MWCNT/HAp coatings on Ti6Al4V implants: enhancing surface characteristics and biocompatibility via plasma electrolytic oxidation. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 33, 7620–7644 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.11410.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.114 ↗
45. M.S. Safavi et al., Enhanced in vitro immersion behavior and antibacterial activity of NiTi orthopedic biomaterial by HAp-Nb2O5 composite deposits. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 1–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43393-310.1038/s41598-023-43393-3 ↗
46. M.S. Safavi, J. Khalil-Allafi, L. Visai, Improved osteogenic activity of NiTi orthopedic implant by HAp-Nb2O5 composite coatings: materials and biological points of view. Biomaterials Advances 150, 213435 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21343510.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213435 ↗
47. S. Meejoo, W. Maneeprakorn, P. Winotai, Phase and thermal stability of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite prepared via microwave heating. Thermochim. Acta 447(1), 115–120 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2006.04.01310.1016/j.tca.2006.04.013 ↗
48. A. Destainville, E. Champion, D. Bernache-Assollant, E. Laborde, Synthesis, characterization and thermal behavior of apatitic tricalcium phosphate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 80(1), 269–277 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00466-210.1016/S0254-0584(02)00466-2 ↗
49. M.R. Pantović Pavlović et al., Modified titanium surface with nano amorphous calcium phosphate@chitosan oligolactate as ion loading platform with multifunctional properties for potential biomedical application. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 52(8), 2221–2233 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03521-010.1007/s10439-024-03521-0 ↗
50. K. Prem. Ananth, J. Sun, J. Bai, Superior corrosion protection and in vitro biocompatibility of Na-HAp/CS composite coating on PoPD-coated 316L SS. Mater. Today Chem. 10, 153–166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.08.00110.1016/j.mtchem.2018.08.001 ↗
51. B. Gondolph-Zink, S.-K. Zollernalb, Beschichtung auf die Osteointegration belasteter und unbelasteter Implantate. Orthopäde 27, 96–104 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL0000348410.1007/PL00003484 ↗
52. K. Prem. Ananth, A.J. Nathanael, S.P. Jose, T.H. Oh, D. Mangalaraj, A.M. Ballamurugan, Controlled electrophoretic deposition of HAp/β-TCP composite coatings on piranha treated 316L SS for enhanced mechanical and biological properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 353, 189–199 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.11110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.111 ↗