Optimization of the porosity of membrane electrode assembly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. M.T. Muñoz Díaz, H. Chávez Oróstica, J. Guajardo, Economic analysis: green hydrogen production systems. Processes. 11, 1390 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1105139010.3390/pr11051390 ↗
2. T.M. Gür, Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2696–2767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE02359E10.1039/C8EE02359E ↗
3. S.J. Davis, N.S. Lewis, M. Shaner, S. Aggarwal, D. Arent, I.L. Azevedo et al., Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science. 360, eaas9793 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas979310.1126/science.aas9793 ↗
4. O. Schmidt, S. Melchior, A. Hawkes, I. Staffell, Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies. Joule. 3, 81–100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.00810.1016/j.joule.2018.12.008 ↗
5. Y.N. Regmi, X. Peng, J.C. Fornaciari, M. Wei, D.J. Myers, A.Z. Weber et al., A low temperature unitized regenerative fuel cell realizing 60% round trip efficiency and 10000 cycles of durability for energy storage applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2096–2105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE00271D10.1039/D0EE00271D ↗
6. J.S. Park, P. Krishnan, S.H. Park, G.G. Park, T.H. Yang, W.Y. Lee et al., A study on fabrication of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)-based membrane-electrode assemblies for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources. 178, 642–650 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.11810.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.118 ↗
7. T. Berning, D. Bessarabov, GOMEA: a conceptual design of a membrane electrode assembly for a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Membranes. 13, 614 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1307061410.3390/membranes13070614 ↗
8. D. Banham, S. Ye, Current status and future development of catalyst materials and catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: an industrial perspective. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 629–638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0012010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00120 ↗
9. S.A. Mauger, K. Neyerlin, S.M. Alia, C. Ngo, S.K. Babu, K.E. Hurst et al., Fuel cell performance implications of membrane electrode assembly fabrication with platinum-nickel nanowire catalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F238 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1021803jes10.1149/2.1021803jes ↗
10. S. Litster, McLea.n, PEM fuel cell electrodes. J. Power Sources. 130, 61–76 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.055 ↗
11. X. Huang, Y. He, Y. Sun, L. Sun, T. Wang, X. Zhang, Gradient ionomer designed cathode catalyst layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells with enhanced performance. J. Power Sources. 603, 234488 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23448810.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.234488 ↗
12. B. Millington, V. Whipple, B.G. Pollet, A novel method for Preparing proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes by the ultrasonic-spray technique. J. Power Sources. 196, 8500–8508 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.06110.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.061 ↗
13. S. Erkan, I. Eroglu, Ultrasonic spray coating technique for high-performance PEM fuel cell electrode manufacturing, in: Prog. Clean Energy, Vol. 2: Novel Syst. Appl., Springer, 2015, pp. 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17031-2_4010.1007/978-3-319-17031-2_40 ↗
14. J. Lobato, M. Rodrigo, J. Linares, K. Scott, Effect of the catalytic ink Preparation method on the performance of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources. 157, 284–292 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.01610.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.016 ↗
15. S.A. Mauger, K. Neyerlin, A.C. Yang-Neyerlin, K.L. More, M. Ulsh, Gravure coating for roll-to-roll manufacturing of proton-exchange-membrane fuel cell catalyst layers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F1012–F1018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0481811jes10.1149/2.0481811jes ↗
16. B.G. Pollet, The use of ultrasound for the fabrication of fuel cell materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 35, 11986–12004 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.02110.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.021 ↗
17. H. Xu, E.L. Brosha, F. Garzon, F. Uribe, M. Wilson, B. Pivovar, The effect of electrode ink processing and composition on catalyst utilization. ECS Trans. 11, 383–390 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.278090910.1149/1.2780909 ↗
18. S. Khandavalli, J.H. Park, N.N. Kariuki, D.J. Myers, J.J. Stickel, K. Hurst et al., Rheological investigation on the microstructure of fuel cell catalyst inks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 10, 43610–43622 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1483910.1021/acsami.8b14839 ↗
19. J. Burghart, G. Ovarlez, Y. Medina-Gonzalez, Interplays between Preparation and processing of the catalyst ink in the manufacturing of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layer. J. Power Sources. 660, 238497 (2025)10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.238497 ↗
20. M. Wang, J.H. Park, S. Kabir, K.C. Neyerlin, N.N. Kariuki, H. Lv et al., Impact of catalyst ink dispersing methodology on fuel cell performance using in-situ X-ray scattering. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 6417–6427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b0109910.1021/acsaem.9b01099 ↗
21. R.N. Bonifácio, J.O.A. Paschoal, M. Linardi, R. Cuenca, Catalyst layer optimization by surface tension control during ink formulation of membrane electrode assemblies in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources. 196, 4680–4685 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.06110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.061 ↗
22. M. Chen, S. Du, J.C.Y. Jung, R. Zhang, Z. Dong, N. Djilali et al., Effect of dispersion method on ink rheology and microstructure of microporous layer for PEMFCs. J. Electrochem. Soc. 170, 054513 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/acc6db10.1149/1945-7111/acc6db ↗
23. N. Kumano, K. Kudo, A. Suda, Y. Akimoto, M. Ishii, H. Nakamura, Controlling cracking formation in fuel cell catalyst layers. J. Power Sources. 419, 219–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.065 ↗
24. Y. Guo, D. Yang, B. Li, D. Yang, P. Ming, C. Zhang, Effect of dispersion solvents and ionomers on the rheology of catalyst inks and catalyst layer structure for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 13, 27119–27128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0627910.1021/acsami.1c06279 ↗
25. S.J. Shin, J.K. Lee, H.Y. Ha, S.A. Hong, H.S. Chun, I.H. Oh, Effect of the catalytic ink Preparation method on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources. 106, 146–152 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01013-310.1016/S0378-7753(01)01013-3 ↗
26. M. Mandal, M. Secanell, Improved polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer performance by using carbon black as a pore former in the anode catalyst layer. J. Power Sources. 541, 231629 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23162910.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231629 ↗
27. T. Suzuki, H. Tanaka, M. Hayase, S. Tsushima, S. Hirai, Investigation of porous structure formation of catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells and their effect on cell performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 41, 20326–20335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.07310.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.073 ↗
28. J. Zhao, X. He, L. Wang, J. Tian, C. Wan, C. Jiang, Addition of NH₄HCO₃ as pore-former in membrane electrode assembly for PEMFC. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 32, 380–384 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.07.01910.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.07.019 ↗
29. J. Zhao, H. Liu, X. Li, Structure, property, and performance of catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, electrochem. Energy Rev. 6, 13–35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-022-00144-z10.1007/s41918-022-00144-z ↗
30. J.K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, A. Logadottir, L. Lindqvist, J.R. Kitchin, T. Bligaard et al., Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗
31. Y. Yin, J. Liu, Y. Chang, Y. Zhu, X. Xie, Y. Qin et al., Design of Pt-C/Fe-NSC cathode dual catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells under low humidity. Electrochim. Acta. 296, 450–457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.08510.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.085 ↗
32. O.T. Holton, J.W. Stevenson, The role of platinum in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Platin Met. Rev. 57, 259–271 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1595/147106713X67122210.1595/147106713X671222 ↗
33. M. Neergat, R. Rahul, Unsupported Cu-Pt core-shell nanoparticles: oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalyst with better activity and reduced precious metal content. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, F234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.001207jes10.1149/2.001207jes ↗
34. Y. Ding, M. Chen, J. Erlebacher, Metallic mesoporous nanocomposites for electrocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 6876–6877 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja048657910.1021/ja0486579 ↗
35. Z. Chen, D. Higgins, A. Yu, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, A review on non-precious metal electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3167–3192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00558D10.1039/C0EE00558D ↗
36. D.C. Higgins, Z. Chen, Recent progress in non-precious metal catalysts for PEM fuel cell applications. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 91, 1881–1895 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2184010.1002/cjce.21840 ↗
37. P. Zamani, D.C. Higgins, F.M. Hassan, X. Fu, J.Y. Choi, M.A. Hoque et al., Highly active and porous graphene encapsulating carbon nanotubes as a non-precious oxygen reduction electrocatalyst for hydrogen-air fuel cells. Nano Energy. 26, 267–275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.04010.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.040 ↗
38. X. Fu, F.M. Hassan, P. Zamani, G. Jiang, D.C. Higgins, J.Y. Choi et al., Engineered architecture of nitrogenous graphene encapsulating porous carbon with nano-channel reactors enhancing the PEM fuel cell performance. Nano Energy. 42, 249–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.008 ↗
39. J. Zhu, M. Xiao, P. Song, J. Fu, Z. Jin, L. Ma et al., Highly polarized carbon nano-architecture as robust metal-free catalyst for oxygen reduction in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nano Energy. 49, 23–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.01510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.015 ↗
40. J. Fan, M. Chen, Z. Zhao, Z. Zhang, S. Ye, S. Xu et al., Bridging the gap between highly active oxygen reduction reaction catalysts and effective catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Energy. 6, 475–486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00800-z10.1038/s41560-021-00800-z ↗
41. H. Liu, T. Zhou, P. Cheng, Transport phenomena analysis in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Heat. Transf. 127, 1363–1379 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.200896210.1115/1.2008962 ↗
42. C.Y. Ahn, S.Y. Kang, H.J. Choi, O.H. Kim, Y.E. Sung, Y.H. Cho, Effect of anode iridium oxide content on the electrochemical performance and resistance to cell reversal potential of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 46, 14713–14723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.19910.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.199 ↗
43. W. Li, X. Bi, M. Luo, P.C. Sui, Numerical investigations on the ultrasonic atomization of catalyst inks for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 034502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abec4c10.1149/1945-7111/abec4c ↗
44. C. Simon, J. Endres, B. Nefzger-Loders, F. Wilhelm, H.A. Gasteiger, Interaction of pore size and hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity for improved oxygen and water transport through microporous layers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, F1022–F1030 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0541913jes10.1149/2.0541913jes ↗
45. J. Im, M.C. Kim, C. Park, Y.H. Jeong, B. Jeong, K. Hyun et al., Investigation into shear-thinning behavior in wet spinning of carbon nanotube fibers modeled by power law viscosity model. Carbon. 232, 119766 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11976610.1016/j.carbon.2023.119766 ↗
46. A.S. Negi, C.O. Osuji, New insights on fumed colloidal rheology—shear thickening and vorticity-aligned structures in flocculating dispersions. Rheol Acta. 48(8), 871–881 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-009-0396-610.1007/s00397-009-0396-6 ↗
47. C.O. Osuji, C. Kim, D.A. Weitz, Shear thickening and scaling of the elastic modulus in a fractal colloidal system with attractive interactions. Phys. Rev. E. 77(6), 060402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.06040210.1103/PhysRevE.77.060402 ↗
48. D.S. Chan, C.C. Wan, Influence of PTFE dispersion in the catalyst layer of porous gas-diffusion electrodes for phosphoric acid fuel cells. J. Power Sources. 50(1–2), 163–176 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7753(94)01962-710.1016/0378-7753(94)01962-7 ↗
49. Z. Ali, M. Mehmood, M. Aslam, M.A. Haider, In-situ grown nickel–cobalt (NiCo) alloy nanoparticles decorated on petal-like nitrogen-doped carbon spheres for efficient OER activity. Chem. Select. 7, e202200196 (2022)
50. C.T. Rueden, J. Schindelin, M.C. Hiner, B.E. DeZonia, A.E. Walter, E.T. Arena et al., ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 18, 1–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
51. R. Lin, T. Zhao, H. Zhang, C. Cao, B. Li, J. Ma, Influence of PTFE on electrode structure for performance of PEMFC and 10-cells stack. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 25, 1171–1175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2012.06.117110.3901/CJME.2012.06.1171 ↗
52. A.C. Bhosale, P.C. Ghosh, L. Assaud, Preparation methods of membrane electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells and unitized regenerative fuel cells: A review, renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 133, 110286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.11028610.1016/j.rser.2020.110286 ↗
53. M. Sabharwal, M. Secanell, Understanding the effect of porosity and pore size distribution on low loading catalyst layers. Electrochim. Acta. 419, 140410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14041010.1016/j.electacta.2022.140410 ↗
54. J. Shen, J. Zhou, N.G. Astrath, T. Navessin, Z.S.S. Liu, C. Lei et al., Measurement of effective gas diffusion coefficients of catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells with a Loschmidt diffusion cell. J. Power Sources. 196, 674–678 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.09410.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.094 ↗
55. M. Sabharwal, L. Pant, A. Putz, D. Susac, J. Jankovic, M. Secanell, Analysis of catalyst layer microstructures: from imaging to performance. Fuel Cells. 16, 734–753 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.20150017910.1002/fuce.201500179 ↗
56. S. Krainer, U. Hirn, Contact angle measurement on porous substrates: effect of liquid absorption and drop size. Colloids Surf., A 619, 126503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12650310.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126503 ↗
57. S. Thiele, R. Zengerle, C. Ziegler, Nano-morphology of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer—imaging, reconstruction and analysis. Nano Res. 4, 849–860 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-011-0134-010.1007/s12274-011-0134-0 ↗
58. Z. Yu, R. Carter, J. Zhang, Measurements of pore size distribution, porosity, effective oxygen diffusivity, and tortuosity of PEM fuel cell electrodes. Fuel Cells. 12, 557–565 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.20110019110.1002/fuce.201100191 ↗
59. W. Zheng, S.H. Kim, The effects of catalyst layer microstructure and water saturation on the effective diffusivity in PEMFC. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F468 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0681807jes10.1149/2.0681807jes ↗
60. Z. Ali, M. Mehmood, J. Ahmad, X. Li, A. Majeed, H. Tabassum, P.X. Hou, C. Liu, A platelet graphitic nanofiber–carbon nanotube hybrid for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. ChemCatChem. 12, 360–365 (2020)10.1002/cctc.201901462 ↗
61. M. Tu, Z. Zhu, H. Yang, M.-S. Balogun, Y. Huang, Y. Tong, Functionalized 3D Mo₂N current collectors drive multi-phase Ni-based synergy and mitigate surface reconstruction for enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis. Small. 21, 2502063 (2025)10.1002/smll.202502063 ↗
62. Z. Ali, M. Mehmood, J. Ahmad, S. Naz, Y. Khan, Heteroatoms (N, F, O)-doped CNTs on NiCo–silica nanocomposites for oxygen evolution reaction. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 46, 395–406 (2021)10.1007/s13369-020-04866-z ↗
63. M. Mushtaq, M. Koroma, S. Jiang, S. Mathi, M. Tu, Z. Khanam, M.S. Balogun, Optimized trimetallic Selenide heterostructures as high-performance trifunctional electrodes for self-sustained hydrogen production. J. Mater. Chem. A 13(8), 5933–5944 (2025)10.1039/D4TA06540A ↗
64. A. Fischer, J. Jindra, H. Wendt, Porosity and catalyst utilization of thin layer cathodes in air operated PEM-fuel cells. J. Appl. Electrochem. 28, 277–282 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100336132888210.1023/A:1003361328882 ↗
65. S. Gamburzev, A.J. Appleby, Recent progress in performance improvement of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). J. Power Sources. 107, 5–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01014-510.1016/S0378-7753(01)01014-5 ↗
66. Y.G. Yoon, G.G. Park, T.H. Yang, J.N. Han, W.Y. Lee, C.S. Kim, Effect of pore structure of catalyst layer in a PEMFC on its performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 28, 657–662 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00156-910.1016/S0360-3199(02)00156-9 ↗
67. G. Schramm, A Practical Approach To Rheology and Rheometry (Haake, Karlsruhe, 1994)
68. R. Jono, S. Tejima, J. Fujita, Microstructure of the fluid particles around the rigid body at the shear-thickening state toward understanding of the fluid mechanics, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 24204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03618-810.1038/s41598-021-03618-8 ↗
69. S. Du, W. Li, H. Wu, P.Y.A. Chuang, M. Pan, P.C. Sui, Effects of ionomer and dispersion methods on rheological behavior of proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst layer ink. Int. J. Hydrog Energy. 45(53), 29430–29441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.09110.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.091 ↗
70. H. Liu, L. Ney, N. Zamel, X. Li, Effect of catalyst ink and formation process on the multiscale structure of catalyst layers in PEM fuel cells. Appl. Sci. 12, 3776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1208377610.3390/app12083776 ↗
71. T. Soboleva, X. Zhao, K. Malek, Z. Xie, T. Navessin, S. Holdcroft, On the micro-, meso-, and macroporous structures of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2, 375–384 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/am900729r10.1021/am900729r ↗
72. N. Kumano, K. Kudo, Y. Akimoto, M. Ishii, H. Nakamura, Influence of ionomer adsorption on agglomerate structures in high-solid catalyst inks. Carbon. 169, 429–439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.06310.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.063 ↗
73. Y. Hu, M. Tu, T. Xiong, Y. He, M. Mushtaq, H. Yang, M.S. Balogun, Thermal strain engineering in cobalt-coordinated Mo₂N for efficient ampere-level current density alkaline fresh/seawater hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. J. Energy Chem. 103, 282–293 (2025)10.1016/j.jechem.2024.11.045 ↗
74. A.K. Ipadeola, S. Mathi, M.H. Sliem, M.S. Balogun, A.M. Abdullah, Interstitial Cobalt nitrides (CoₓN): holistic frontiers in energy storage and catalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 13(28), 22200–22239 (2025)10.1039/D5TA02335A ↗