journal article·2025-12

Unveiling gas transport mechanisms in porous boron nitride nanotubes: A simulation study of CH₄/H₂, CO₂/H₂, and CO₂/CH₄ mixtures

Zabiholah Zabihi Lahrami, Ali Afshar

Applied Physics A· Volume 131· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Y. Zhou, D. Qu, Z. Qian, Y. Yang, P. Li, A.E. Rodrigues, Methane simultaneous recovery from CH4/N2 stream and CH4/CO2 stream by the displacement VPSA process. Fluid. Phase. Equilibria. 561, 113541 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2022.11354110.1016/j.fluid.2022.113541 ↗
2. R. Maniarasu, S.K. Rathore, S. Murugan, Preparation and characterization studies of biomass-based adsorbents for CO2 capture. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 33, 5195–5205 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08360-z10.1007/s11665-023-08360-z ↗
3. M. Zhang, W. Qian, H. Ma, W. Ying, H. Zhang, P. Yuan, A theoretical study on the separation of CO2/CH4 through MFI zeolite. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1228, 114272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2023.11427210.1016/j.comptc.2023.114272 ↗
4. A. Raza, Adsorption-desorption hysteresis of gas mixtures/graphite system through molecular simulation: implications for gas separation membrane technology. Fluid. Phase. Equilibria. 593, 114352 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2025.11435210.1016/j.fluid.2025.114352 ↗
5. Y. Liu, B. Li, X. Lei, S. Liu, H. Zhu, E. Ding, P. Ning, Novel method for high-performance simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 by coupling yellow phosphorus emulsion with red mud. Chem. Eng. J. 428, 131991 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13199110.1016/j.cej.2021.131991 ↗
6. X. Chen, S. Lv, Y. Liu, H. Gu, X. Sun, Q. Hu, Y. Zhao, Z. Li, T. Guo, J. Kang, L.-M. Liu, L. Guo, Antiferroelectric SnO2 network with amorphous surface for electrochemical N2 fixation. Angew. Chem. 64(43), e202515222 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20251522210.1002/anie.202515222 ↗
7. T. Liu, H. Sun*, G. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Xiao, Y. Lu, C. Niu and Y. Wu, Decay characteristic of gas arc in C4F7N/N2 and C4F7N/CO2 gas mixture by Thomson scattering, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 58, 045203 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad8bd710.1088/1361-6463/ad8bd7 ↗
8. K. Hu, B. Liu, Y. Pang, R. Li, Q. Zhang, J. Shi, H. Liu, H2 and CH4 adsorption on coal: insights from experiment and mathematical model. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 120, 542–557 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.23310.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.233 ↗
9. L. Chen, G. Liu, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Li, Machine learning and molecular design algorithm assisted discovery of gas separation membranes exceeding the CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 upper bounds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 291, 119952 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.11995210.1016/j.ces.2024.119952 ↗
10. M. Fu, Z. Ma, C. Gao, Y. Ye, W. Li, D. Hou, Y. Cao, A. multi-functional, VOC sensor based on cascaded quartz crystal resonators. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 46(3), 476–479 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2025.352802410.1109/LED.2025.3528024 ↗
11. J. Xiaohui Liu, S. Liu, H. Mao, Y. Xu, W. Wang, Z. Tao, Li, Molecular dynamics simulation of CO2 permeation and separation in Zr-MOF membranes. Fluid. Phase. Equilibria. 581, 114073 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2024.11407310.1016/j.fluid.2024.114073 ↗
12. J. Xu, P. Sang, W. Xing, Z. Shi, L. Zhao, W. Guo, Z. Yan, Insights into the H2/CH4 separation through two-dimensional graphene channels: influence of edge functionalization. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10, 492 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1199-210.1186/s11671-015-1199-2 ↗
13. X. Qiu, Y. Zheng, H. Li, K. Qu, H. Yan, R. Li, Unveiling gas transport mechanisms in tunable MXene nanochannels: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Membr. Sci. 715, 123459 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12345910.1016/j.memsci.2024.123459 ↗
14. J.M.D. Sousa, L.D. Machado, C.F. Woellner, M. Medina, P.A.S. Autreto, D.S. Galvão, Boron nitride nanotube peapods at ultrasonic velocity impacts: a fully atomistic molecular dynamics investigation. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 35, 335701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/acd50b10.1088/1361-648X/acd50b ↗
15. C.X. Cui, J.W. Jiang, The effect of layer number on the gas permeation through nanopores within few-layer graphene. Nanotechnology 33, 245702 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac5a8210.1088/1361-6528/ac5a82 ↗
16. Y. Li, C.X. Cui, J.W. Jiang, Gas permeation through nanoporous single-walled carbon nanotubes: the confinement effect. Nanotechnology 33, 455704 (2022)10.1088/1361-6528/ac85f5 ↗
17. Z.Z. Lahrami, Acoustically-inspired force-driven separation of hydrogen from methane through nanoporous graphene membranes: a molecular dynamics study. Appl. Phys. A 131, 683 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-025-08824-010.1007/s00339-025-08824-0 ↗
18. G. Koh, Y.-W. Zhang, H. Pan, First-principles study on hydrogen storage by graphitic carbon nitride nanotubes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37(5), 4170–4178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.10910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.109 ↗
19. Y. Zhu, Y. Feng, S. Chen, M. Ding, J. Yao, Carbon nitride nanotube-based materials for energy and environmental applications: a review of recent progresses. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(48), 25626–25648 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA08892G10.1039/D0TA08892G ↗
20. R. Guo, Y.-S. Tseng, I. Retita, G. Bahmanrokh, B. Arkhurst, S.L.I. Chan, A detailed experimental comparison on the hydrogen storage ability of different forms of graphitic carbon nitride (bulk, nanotubes and sheets) with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Today Chem. 30, 101508 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.10150810.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101508 ↗
21. C.Y. Won, N.R. Aluru, Water permeation through a subnanometer Boron nitride nanotube. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(10), 2748–2749 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja068731810.1021/ja0687318 ↗
22. D. Golberg, Y. Bando, Y. Huang, T. Terao, M. Mitome, C. Tang, C. Zhi, Boron nitride nanotubes and nanosheets. ACS Nano 4(6), 2979–2993 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100649510.1021/nn1006495 ↗
23. Q. Weng, X. Wang, C. Zhi, Y. Bando, D. Golberg, Boron nitride porous microbelts for hydrogen storage. ACS Nano 7(2), 1558–1565 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn305320v10.1021/nn305320v ↗
24. S.-H. Lee, M.J. Kim, S. Ahn, B. Koh, Purification of boron nitride nanotubes enhances biological application properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(4), 1529 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2104152910.3390/ijms21041529 ↗
25. N. Yanar, E. Yang, H. Park, M. Son, H. Choi, Boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) membranes for energy and environmental applications. Membranes 10(12), 430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1012043010.3390/membranes10120430 ↗
26. J. Dai, X. Wu, J. Yang, X.C. Zeng, Porous boron nitride with tunable pore size. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5(2), 393–398 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz402653510.1021/jz4026535 ↗
27. M. Maurya, P.K. Sappidi, J.K. Singh, Selective separation of CO2 from flue gas using carbon and Boron nitride nanotubes as a membrane. Energy Fuels 34, 7223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0031110.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00311 ↗
28. Y. Zhang, Q. Shi, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Meng, C. Xiao, K. Deng, D. Rao, R. Lu, Hexagonal boron nitride with designed nanopores as a high efficiency membrane for separating gaseous hydrogen from methane. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 19826 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0491810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04918 ↗
29. M.D. Ganji, R. Dodangeh, Hydrogen purification performance of a nanoporous hexagonal Boron nitride membrane: molecular dynamics and first-principle simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 12032 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP01665D10.1039/C7CP01665D ↗
30. N.S. Tabrizi, B. Vahid, J. Azamat, Functionalized single-atom thickness boron nitride membrane for separation of arsenite ion from water: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Phys. Chem. Res. 8, 543 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22036/pcr.2020.222756.174210.22036/pcr.2020.222756.1742 ↗
31. M.R. Mananghaya, A simulation of hydrogen adsorption/desorption in metal-functionalized BN nanotube. Mater. Chem. Phys. 240, 122159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12215910.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122159 ↗
32. X. Peng, Nanotube-mediated storage of methane and hydrogen: insights from molecular simulation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12, 113592 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.11359210.1016/j.jece.2024.113592 ↗
33. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, K. Schulten, V.M.D.-V.M. Dynamics, J. Molec Graphics. 14, 33 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
34. B.J. Bucior, D.L. Chen, J. Liu, J.K. Johnson, Porous carbon nanotube membranes for separation of H2/CH4 and CO2/CH4 mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 25904–25910 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp309802210.1021/jp3098022 ↗
35. P.I. Ravikovitch, A. Vishnyakov, A.V. Neimark, Density functional theories and molecular simulations of adsorption and phase transitions in nanopores. Phys. Rev. E. 64, 011602 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.01160210.1103/PhysRevE.64.011602 ↗
36. J. Li, V.M. Calo, Phase-coexistence simulations of fluid mixtures by the Markov chain Monte Carlo method using single-particle models. J. Comput. Phys. 249, 233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.01610.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.016 ↗
37. P. Kowalczyk, P.A. Gauden, A.P. Terzyk, Cryogenic separation of hydrogen isotopes in single-walled carbon and boron-nitride nanotubes: insight into the mechanism of equilibrium quantum sieving in quasi-one-dimensional pores. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 8275–8284 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp800735k10.1021/jp800735k ↗
38. X. Peng, D. Cao, W. Wang, Heterogeneity characterization of ordered mesoporous carbon adsorbent CMK-1 for methane and hydrogen storage: GCMC simulation and comparison with experiment. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 13024–13036 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp803413310.1021/jp8034133 ↗
39. X. Peng, D. Cao, W. Wang, Computational study on purification of CO2 from natural gas by C60 intercalated graphite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 8787–8796 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101043310.1021/ie1010433 ↗
40. X. Peng, D. Cao, W. Wang, Computational characterization of hexagonally ordered carbon nanopipes CMK-5 and structural optimization for H2 storage. Langmuir 25, 10863–10872 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/la901440s10.1021/la901440s ↗
41. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995)10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
42. A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comp Phys Comm. 271, 10817 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗