Electrical characterization of Cr/p–Hg₁₋ₓCdₓTe (x = 0.28, 1.0) contacts using LTLM: contact resistance and current transport mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Semiconductor materials and devices · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Rogalski, Proc. SPIE. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.230077910.1117/12.2300779 ↗
2. C.L. Tan, H. Mohseni, Nanophotonics (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-006110.1515/nanoph-2017-0061 ↗
3. F. Sizov, Materials Research Foundations, LLC Forum (2020). https://doi.org/10.21741/978164490075810.21741/9781644900758 ↗
4. W. Lei, J. Antoszewski, L. Faraone, Appl. Phys. Reviews. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493657710.1063/1.4936577 ↗
5. D. Lee, P. Dreiske, J. Ellsworth et al., Proc. SPIE 11407. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.256490210.1117/12.2564902 ↗
6. P. Madejczyk, T. Manyk, J. Rutkowski, Sensors (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2303108810.3390/s23031088 ↗
7. F.F. Sizov, J.V. Gumenjuk-Sichevska, S.N. Danilov, Z.F. Tsybrii, Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. (2022). https://doi.org/10.15407/spqeo25.03.25410.15407/spqeo25.03.254 ↗
8. P. Norton, Opto-Electr Rev. 10, 159 (2002)
9. R. Haakenaasen, E. Selvig, A. Heier, C Et Al J. Electron. Mater. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-07415-z10.1007/s11664-019-07415-z ↗
10. F. Sizov, M.V. Vuichyk, K. Svezhentsova, Z. Tsybrii, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proces. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2020.10557710.1016/j.mssp.2020.105577 ↗
11. W. Pan, S. Ma, X. Sun et al., Structural properties and defect formation mechanisms in MBE-grown HgCdTe on InSb (211)B substrates. J. Appl. Phys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.015995510.1063/5.0159955 ↗
12. V.S. Meena, A.K. Saini, A. Singh et al., Structural, compositional, morphological and electrical characteristics of thermally evaporated Au Ohmic Contact on p-type HgCdTe substrate for possible infrared detectors. Opt. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11394310.1016/j.optmat.2023.113943 ↗
13. M. Todeschini et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1013610.1021/acsami.7b10136 ↗
14. R. J. Westerhout, R. H. Sewell, J. M. Dell, et al., Structure and electrical characteristics of metal/MCT interfaces. Mercury cadmium telluride: growth, properties and applications (New York, Wiley, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470669464.ch1510.1002/9780470669464.ch15 ↗
15. N. Licausi, S. Rao, I. Bhat, J. Electron. Mater. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1640-y10.1007/s11664-011-1640-y ↗
16. Z. Tsybrii, Y. Bezsmolnyy, K. Svezhentsova et al., J. Cryst. Growth (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.12529510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125295 ↗
17. A. Lopez-Otero, Thin Solid Films. (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(78)90309-710.1016/0040-6090(78)90309-7 ↗
18. Z. Tsybrii, M. Vuichyk, K. Svezhentsova, M. Smolii, Y. Gomeniuk, A. Nazarov, F. Sizov, Mater. Chem. Phys. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12558110.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125581 ↗
19. Q. Lu, X. Wang, Y. Wei et al., Mater. Res. Express. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abda6b10.1088/2053-1591/abda6b ↗
20. N. Popovici, M. Paramês, R. Da, Silva et al., Appl. Phys. A (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2795-710.1007/s00339-004-2795-7 ↗
21. M.M. Abdullah, F.M. Rajab, S.M. Al-Abbas, AIP Adv. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486701210.1063/1.4867012 ↗
22. N.I.S.T. Chemistry, WebBook, NIST, SRD 69. (2025). https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303, Accessed 01.04.202510.18434/T4D303 ↗
23. C.S. Cheng, H. Gomi, H. Sakata, Physica Status Solidi (a) (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.221155021510.1002/pssa.2211550215 ↗
24. H.M. Kamari, N.M. Al-Hada, A.A. Baqer, A.H. Shaari, E. Saion, J. Mater. Science: Mater. Electron. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01125-210.1007/s10854-019-01125-2 ↗
25. G.K. Reeves, H.B. Harrison, IEEE Electrt Device Lett. (1982). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDL.1982.2550210.1109/EDL.1982.25502 ↗
26. S. Grover, Effect of transmission line measurement (TLM) geometry on specific contact resistivity determination, ThesisRochester Institute of Technology. (2016). https://repository.rit.edu/theses/9343. Accessed 03.03.2025
27. V. Srivastav, R. Pal, B.L. Sharma et al., J. Electr. Mater. 34, 3 (2005)
28. S. Grover, Optimization of Transmission Line Measurement (TLM) Structures for specific contact resistivity determination34th annual microelectronic engineering conference. (2016). https://www.scribd.com/document/676811376/Optimization-of-Transmission-Line-Measurement-TLM-Structures-fo. Accessed 07.03.2025
29. D. Liu, C. Lin, S. Zhou, X. Hu, J. Electr. Mater. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-016-4375-y10.1007/s11664-016-4375-y ↗
30. F. Sizov, Z. Tsybrii, M. Apats’ka et al., Semicond. Sci. Techn. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/abc0f710.1088/1361-6641/abc0f7 ↗
31. R.T. Tung, Appl. Phys. Rev. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.485840010.1063/1.4858400 ↗
32. D. Skachkov, S.-L. Liu, Y. Wang, X.-G. Zhang, H.-P. Cheng, Phys. Rev. B (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.04542910.1103/PhysRevB.104.045429 ↗
33. W.J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. (1947). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0657-0_710.1007/978-94-009-0657-0_7 ↗
34. A.M. Cowley, S.M. Sze, J. Appl. Phys. (1965). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.170295210.1063/1.1702952 ↗
35. V. Heine, Phys. Rev. A (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.138.A168910.1103/PhysRev.138.A1689 ↗
36. J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.46510.1103/PhysRevLett.52.465 ↗
37. W.E. Spicer, I. Lindau, P.R. Skeath, C.Y. Su, J. Vac Sci. Technol. (1980). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.57058310.1116/1.570583 ↗
38. H. Hasegawa, H. Ohno, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B (1986). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.58355610.1116/1.583556 ↗
39. J. Kotani, T. Hashizume, H. Hasegawa, J. Vac Sci. Technol. B (2004). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.177167810.1116/1.1771678 ↗
40. H. Hasegawa, S. Oyama, J. Vac Sci. Technol. B (2002). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.149153910.1116/1.1491539 ↗