Determining errors in force measurements for colloids close to contact
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Due to diffraction patterns in light microscopy, the overlapping of colloid images introduces minor errors in determining particle positions, which affecting the accuracy of observing interactions between colloids near contact. This study quantitatively investigates the errors arising from the overlapping effect in force measurements between two closely positioned colloids using digital video microscopy (DVM). For this aim, computer simulations were conducted to obtain the positions of two optically trapped colloids interacting based on a force model and particle images were generated as a time series using experimental particle intensity profiles for two different particle sizes. These generated images were analyzed using tracking algorithms from the literature and the interaction forces were extracted and compared with theoretical force values. The results demonstrated that diffraction patterns significantly influence the accuracy of particle position detection and interaction force calculations. Large diffraction patterns and intensity fluctuations in an image introduce significant errors. However, these errors can become significantly smaller in the presence of large forces and may therefore be considered negligible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. L. Belloni, Colloidal interactions. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 12(46), 549 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/46/20110.1088/0953-8984/12/46/201 ↗
2. P.L. Biancaniello, J.C. Crocker, Line optical tweezers instrument for measuring nanoscale interactions and kinetics. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77(11), 113702 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.238789310.1063/1.2387893 ↗
3. M. Polin, D.G. Grier, Y. Han, Colloidal electrostatic interactions near a conducting surface. Phys. Rev. E. 76(4), 041406 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.041406. Publisher: American Physical Society10.1103/PhysRevE.76.041406 ↗
4. O. Akhavan, M. Saadati, M. Jannesari, Graphene Jet Nanomotors in Remote Controllable Self-Propulsion Swimmers in Pure Water. Nano Lett. 16(9), 5619–5630 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02175. Publisher: American Chemical Society10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02175 ↗
5. S. Wang, R. Walker-Gibbons, B. Watkins, M. Flynn, M. Krishnan, A charge-dependent long-ranged force drives tailored assembly of matter in solution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19(4), 485–493 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01621-510.1038/s41565-024-01621-5 ↗
6. A. Ashkin, Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 24(4), 156–159 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.156. Publisher: American Physical Society10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.156 ↗
7. A. Ashkin, J.M. Dziedzic, J.E. Bjorkholm, S. Chu, Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11(5), 288–290 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.11.000288. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/OL.11.000288 ↗
8. L.P. Ghislain, W.W. Webb, Scanning-force microscope based on an optical trap. Opt. Lett. 18(19), 1678–1680 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.18.001678. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/OL.18.001678 ↗
9. J.C. Crocker, D.G. Grier, Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179(1), 298–310 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.021710.1006/jcis.1996.0217 ↗
10. D.G. Grier, A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 424(6950), 810–816 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01935. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group10.1038/nature01935 ↗
11. E.-L. Florin, A. Pralle, J.K. Heinrich Hörber, E.H.K. Stelzer, Photonic Force Microscope Based on Optical Tweezers and Two-Photon Excitation for Biological Applications. J. Struct. Biol. 119(2), 202–211 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1997.388010.1006/jsbi.1997.3880 ↗
12. P.H. Jones, O.M. Maragò, G. Volpe, Optical Tweezers: Principles and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978110727971110.1017/CBO9781107279711 ↗
13. G. Pesce, G. Volpe, O.M. Maragó, P.H. Jones, S. Gigan, A. Sasso, G. Volpe, Step-by-step guide to the realization of advanced optical tweezers. JOSA B. 32(5), 84–98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.32.000B84. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/JOSAB.32.000B84 ↗
14. J. Gieseler, J.R. Gomez-Solano, A. Magazzù, I. Pérez Castillo, L. Pérez García, M. Gironella-Torrent, X. Viader-Godoy, F. Ritort, G. Pesce, A.V. Arzola, K. Volke-Sepúlveda, G. Volpe, Optical tweezers — from calibration to applications: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photon. 13(1), 74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.39488810.1364/AOP.394888 ↗
15. J. Baumgartl, C. Bechinger, On the limits of digital video microscopy. Europhys. Lett. 71(3), 487 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2005-10107-2. Publisher: IOP Publishing10.1209/epl/i2005-10107-2 ↗
16. J. Baumgartl, J.L. Arauz-Lara, C. Bechinger, Like-charge attraction in confinement: myth or truth? Soft Matter. 2(8), 631–635 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1039/B603052A. Publisher: The Royal Society of Chemistry10.1039/B603052A ↗
17. M. Polin, Y. Roichman, D.G. Grier, Autocalibrated colloidal interaction measurements with extended optical traps. Phys. Rev. E 77(5), 051401 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051401. Publisher: American Physical Society10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051401 ↗
18. M. Gyger, F. Rückerl, J.A. Käs, J. Ruiz-García, Errors in two particle tracking at close distances. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 326(2), 382–386 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.06.04610.1016/j.jcis.2008.06.046 ↗
19. C. Zhang, G. Brügger, F. Scheffold, Tracking of colloids close to contact. Opt. Express 23(17), 22579–22586 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.022579. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/OE.23.022579 ↗
20. H. Yücel, N.T. Okumuşoğlu, A new tracking algorithm for multiple colloidal particles close to contact. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29(46), 465101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa908e. Publisher: IOP Publishing10.1088/1361-648X/aa908e ↗
21. C. Zhang, J. Muñetón Díaz, A. Muster, D.R. Abujetas, L.S. Froufe-Pérez, F. Scheffold, Determining intrinsic potentials and validating optical binding forces between colloidal particles using optical tweezers. Nat. Commun. 15(1), 1020 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45162-w. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group10.1038/s41467-024-45162-w ↗
22. A.D. Kashkanova, A.B. Shkarin, R.G. Mahmoodabadi, M. Blessing, Y. Tuna, A. Gemeinhardt, V. Sandoghdar, Precision single-particle localization using radial variance transform. Opt. Express 29(7), 11070–11083 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.420670. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/OE.420670 ↗
23. S. Helgadottir, A. Argun, G. Volpe, Digital video microscopy enhanced by deep learning. Optica 6(4), 506–513 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.000506. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/OPTICA.6.000506 ↗
24. R. Parthasarathy, Rapid, accurate particle tracking by calculation of radial symmetry centers. Nat. Methods 9(7), 724–726 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2071. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group10.1038/nmeth.2071 ↗
25. A. Yilmaz, O. Javed, M. Shah, Object tracking: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 38(4), 13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1177352.117735510.1145/1177352.1177355 ↗
26. A.B. Naeini, A.G. Mahdipour, R. Dorri, Using Eye Tracking to Measure Overall Usability of Online Grocery Shopping Websites. Int. J. Mob. Comput. Multimed. Commun. (IJMCMC) 14(1), 1–24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMCMC.326129. Publisher: IGI Global Scientific Publishing10.4018/IJMCMC.326129 ↗
27. H.M. Lee, Y.W. Kim, E.M. Go, C. Revadekar, K.H. Choi, Y. Cho, S.K. Kwak, B.J. Park, Direct measurements of the colloidal Debye force. Nat. Commun. 14(1), 3838 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39561-810.1038/s41467-023-39561-8 ↗
28. H. Yücel, A simulation study on colloid diffusion under time-varying optical potentials. J. Appl. Phys. 134(1), 013101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.015460410.1063/5.0154604 ↗
29. H. Yücel, simLightForce. GitHub. (2023). https://github.com/yucelharun/simLightForce.git. Accessed 15 April 2023
30. G. Pesce, P.H. Jones, O.M. Maragò, G. Volpe, Optical tweezers: theory and practice. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135(12), 949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00843-510.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00843-5 ↗
31. E. Sarmiento-Gómez, J.A. Rivera-Morán, J.L. Arauz-Lara, Single particle states of colloidal particles in 2D periodic potentials. Soft Matter 14(19), 3684–3688 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM00326B. Accessed 11 Nov 201910.1039/C8SM00326B ↗
32. A. Callegari, M. Mijalkov, A.B. Gököz, G. Volpe, Computational toolbox for optical tweezers in geometrical optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32(5), 11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.32.000B1110.1364/JOSAB.32.000B11 ↗
33. GmbH: Micro particle properties. (2023). https://microparticles.de/en/properties. Accessed 06 April 2023
34. G. Volpe, G. Volpe, Simulation of a Brownian particle in an optical trap. Am. J. Phys. 81(3), 224–230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.477263210.1119/1.4772632 ↗
35. P. Wu, R. Huang, C. Tischer, A. Jonas, E.-L. Florin, Direct Measurement of the Nonconservative Force Field Generated by Optical Tweezers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(10), 108101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.108101. Publisher: American Physical Society10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.108101 ↗
36. G.M. Gibson, J. Leach, S. Keen, A.J. Wright, M.J. Padgett, Measuring the accuracy of particle position and force in optical tweezers using high-speed video microscopy. Opt. Express 16(19), 14561–14570 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.014561. Publisher: Optica Publishing Group10.1364/OE.16.014561 ↗
37. H. Flyvbjerg, H.G. Petersen, Error estimates on averages of correlated data. J. Chem. Phys. 91(1), 461–466 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45748010.1063/1.457480 ↗