Promising label-free trapping, isolation and detection of extracellular vesicles, using an interdigitated microelectrode array integrated in a microfluidic cell: theoretical and experimental assessments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Extracellular vesicles in disease
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Cai, J.Y. Sze, A.P. Ivanov, J.B. Edel, Small molecule electro-optical binding assay using nanopores. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1797 (2019)10.1038/s41467-019-09476-4 ↗
2. R. Adato, H. Altug, In-situ ultra-sensitive infrared absorption spectroscopy of biomolecule interactions in real time with plasmonic Nanoantennas. Nat. Commun. 4(1), 2154 (2013)10.1038/ncomms3154 ↗
3. N. An, T. Chen, J. Zhang, G. Wang, M. Yan, S. Yang, Rational electrochemical design of cuprous oxide hierarchical microarchitectures and their derivatives for SERS sensing applications. Small Methods. 8(5), 2300910 (2024)10.1002/smtd.202300910 ↗
4. F. Qian et al., An overview of polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites for sensors. Adv. Compos. Hybrid. Mater. 7(3), 75 (2024)10.1007/s42114-024-00887-6 ↗
5. H. Chen, T. Yamakawa, M. Inaba, M. Nakano, J. Suehiro, Characterization of extra-cellular vesicle dielectrophoresis and estimation of its electric properties. Sensors. 22(9), 3279 (2022)10.3390/s22093279 ↗
6. S.A. Muhsin et al., A microfluidic biosensor for rapid simultaneous detection of waterborne pathogens. Biosens. Bioelectron. 203, 113993 (2022)10.1016/j.bios.2022.113993 ↗
7. M. Havers, A. Broman, A. Lenshof, T. Laurell, Advancement and Obstacles in microfluidics-based isolation of extracellular vesicles. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 415(7), 1265–1285 (2023)10.1007/s00216-022-04362-3 ↗
8. Q. Zeng et al., Stem cells vesicles-loaded type I pro-photosensitizer for synergetic oxygen-independent phototheranostics and microenvironment regulation in infected diabetic wounds. Chem. Eng. J. 505, 159239 (2025)10.1016/j.cej.2025.159239 ↗
9. K. Wang et al., Extracellular matrix stiffness regulates colorectal cancer progression via HSF4. J. Experimental Clin. Cancer Res. 44(1), 30 (2025)10.1186/s13046-025-03297-8 ↗
10. W. Lin et al., Programmable macrophage vesicle based bionic Self-Adjuvanting vaccine for immunization against Monkeypox virus. Adv. Sci. 12(1), 2408608 (2025)10.1002/advs.202408608 ↗
11. Y. Zhang et al., M2 macrophage exosome-derived LncRNA AK083884 protects mice from CVB3-induced viral myocarditis through regulating PKM2/HIF-1α axis mediated metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Redox Biol. 69, 103016 (2023)10.1016/j.redox.2023.103016 ↗
12. W. Pei et al., Multitargeted Immunomodulatory therapy for viral myocarditis by engineered extracellular vesicles. ACS Nano. 18(4), 2782–2799 (2024)10.1021/acsnano.3c05847 ↗
13. B. Adriano, N.M. Cotto, N. Chauhan, M. Jaggi, S.C. Chauhan, M.M. Yallapu, Milk exosomes: nature’s abundant nanoplatform for theranostic applications. Bioactive Mater. 6(8), 2479–2490 (2021)10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.009 ↗
14. S. Matic, V.P. Dia, Bovine milk exosomes affected proliferation of macrophages under hypoxia. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 5, 2108–2113 (2022)10.1016/j.crfs.2022.11.002 ↗
15. N.M. Cotto et al., Milk Exosome-Glow nanosystem for Cancer cellular and tissue bioimaging. Chem. Biomedical Imaging. 2(10), 711–720 (2024)10.1021/cbmi.4c00040 ↗
16. F. Wang et al., Magnetic soft microrobot design for cell grasping and transportation. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 5, 0109 (2024)10.34133/cbsystems.0109 ↗
17. Q. Zhao, S. Yan, B. Zhang, K. Fan, J. Zhang, W. Li, An on-chip viscoelasticity sensor for biological fluids. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 4, 0006 (2023)10.34133/cbsystems.0006 ↗
18. E.-S. Yu et al., Precise capture and dynamic relocation of nanoparticulate biomolecules through dielectrophoretic enhancement by vertical nanogap architectures. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 2804 (2020)10.1038/s41467-020-16630-w ↗
19. L. Weirauch, J. Giesler, G.R. Pesch, M. Baune, J. Thöming, Sorting microparticle mixtures by multiple properties in a single dielectrophoretic filter. Results Eng. 23, 102641 (2024)10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102641 ↗
20. S. Ayala-Mar, J. Donoso‐Quezada, R.C. Gallo‐Villanueva, V.H. Perez‐Gonzalez, J. González‐Valdez, Recent advances and challenges in the recovery and purification of cellular exosomes. Electrophoresis. 40(23 -24), 3036 -3049 (2019)10.1002/elps.201800526 ↗
21. M. Park et al., High-precision extracellular-vesicle isolation-analysis integrated platform for rapid cancer diagnosis directly from blood plasma. Biosens. Bioelectron. 267, 116863 (2025)10.1016/j.bios.2024.116863 ↗
22. M. Lan, F. Yang, Applications of dielectrophoresis in microfluidic-based exosome separation and detection. Chem. Eng. J., p. 152067, 202410.1016/j.cej.2024.152067 ↗
23. M.N. Islam, B. Jaiswal, Z.R. Gagnon, High-Throughput continuous Free-Flow dielectrophoretic trapping of Micron-Scale particles and cells in paper using localized nonuniform Pore-Scale-Generated paper-Based electric field gradients. Anal. Chem. 96(3), 1084–1092 (2024)10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03740 ↗
24. S. Zavatski, O.J. Martin, Visual and quantitative analysis of the trapping volume in dielectrophoresis of nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 24(33), 10305–10312 (2024)10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c02903 ↗
25. Y.-K. Wang, Y.-R. Bao, Y.-X. Liang, Y.-J. Chen, W.-H. Huang, M. Xie, Current progress and prospect of microfluidic-based exosome investigation. TRAC Trends Anal. Chem. 168, 117310 (2023)10.1016/j.trac.2023.117310 ↗
26. L.M. Doyle, M.Z. Wang, Overview of extracellular vesicles, their origin, composition, purpose, and methods for exosome isolation and analysis. Cells 8(7), 727 (2019)10.3390/cells8070727 ↗
27. K. Sidhom, P.O. Obi, A. Saleem, A review of Exosomal isolation methods: is size exclusion chromatography the best option? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(18), 6466 (2020)10.3390/ijms21186466 ↗
28. Y. Li et al., On the design, functions, and biomedical applications of high-throughput dielectrophoretic micro-/nanoplatforms: a review. Nanoscale 13(8), 4330 -4358 (2021)10.1039/D0NR08892G ↗
29. J. Chen et al., Review on strategies and technologies for exosome isolation and purification. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 811971 (2022)10.3389/fbioe.2021.811971 ↗
30. T. Zhang et al., Focusing of sub-micrometer particles in microfluidic devices. Lab. Chip. 20(1), 35–53 (2020)10.1039/C9LC00785G ↗
31. Y. Wang, S. Wang, L. Li, Y. Zou, B. Liu, X. Fang, Microfluidics-based molecular profiling of tumor‐derived exosomes for liquid biopsy. View 4(2), 20220048 (2023)10.1002/VIW.20220048 ↗
32. S. Hettiarachchi et al., Recent microfluidic advances in submicron to nanoparticle manipulation and separation. Lab. Chip. 23(5), 982–1010 (2023)10.1039/D2LC00793B ↗
33. M. Al Ahmad, Electrical detection, identification, and quantification of exosomes. Ieee Access. 6, 22817–22826 (2018)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2828038 ↗
34. Y. Weng et al., Effective isolation of exosomes with polyethylene glycol from cell culture supernatant for in-depth proteome profiling. Analyst 141(15), 4640-4646 (2016)10.1039/C6AN00892E ↗
35. S. Lin et al., Progress in microfluidics-based exosome separation and detection technologies for diagnostic applications. Small. 16(9), 1903916 (2020)10.1002/smll.201903916 ↗
36. G.K. Patel et al., Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 5335 (2019)10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 ↗
37. M. Lan, Z. Ren, C. Cheng, G. Li, F. Yang, Small extracellular vesicles detection using dielectrophoresis-based microfluidic chip for diagnosis of breast cancer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 259, 116382 (2024)10.1016/j.bios.2024.116382 ↗
38. Z. Tian, X. Wang, J. Chen, On-chip dielectrophoretic single-cell manipulation. Microsystems Nanoengineering. 10(1), 117 (2024)10.1038/s41378-024-00750-0 ↗
39. H.A. Pohl, The motion and precipitation of suspensoids in divergent electric fields. J. Appl. Phys. 22(7), 869–871 (1951)10.1063/1.1700065 ↗
40. A. Ramos, H. Morgan, N.G. Green, A. Castellanos, Ac electrokinetics: a review of forces in microelectrode structures. J. Phys. D 31(18), 2338 (1998)10.1088/0022-3727/31/18/021 ↗
41. L. Liu, K. Chen, N. Xiang, Z. Ni, Dielectrophoretic manipulation of nanomaterials: A review. Electrophoresis. 40(6) 873 -889 (2019)10.1002/elps.201800342 ↗
42. H. Morgan, N.G. Green, AC Electrokinetics: Colloids and Nanoparticles (Research Studies, 2003)
43. D.S. Lemons, A. Gythiel, Paul Langevin’s 1908 paper``On the Theory of Brownian Motion’‘[``Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien,‘’CR Acad. Sci.(Paris) 146, 530–533 (1908)].Am. J. Phys. 65(11), 1079 -1081 (1997)10.1119/1.18725 ↗
44. P. Langevin, On the theory of brownian motion. CR Acad. Sci. (Paris). 146, 530 (1908)
45. A. Castellanos, A. Ramos, A. Gonzalez, N.G. Green, H. Morgan, Electrohydrodynamics and dielectrophoresis in microsystems: scaling laws. J. Phys. D 36(20), 2584 (2003)10.1088/0022-3727/36/20/023 ↗
46. D.J. Steigmann, The Role of Mechanics in the Study of Lipid Bilayers (Springer, 2017)10.1007/978-3-319-56348-0 ↗
47. Q. Pan, Y. Huang, T. Rabczuk, Y. Yang, X. Yang, Fully-discrete decoupled Subdivision-based IGA-IEQ-ZEC numerical scheme for the binary surfactant phase-field model coupled with Darcy flow equations on surfaces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 436, 117733 (2025)10.1016/j.cma.2025.117733 ↗
48. Q. Pan, Y. Huang, T. Rabczuk, X. Yang, The subdivision-based IGA-EIEQ numerical scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations coupled with Cahn–Hilliard phase-field model of two-phase incompressible flow on complex curved surfaces. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 424, 116901 (2024)10.1016/j.cma.2024.116901 ↗
49. H. Hadady, F. Karamali, F. Ejeian, S. Haghjooy Javanmard, L. Rafiee, M.H. Nasr Esfahani, AC electrokinetic isolation and detection of extracellular vesicles from dental pulp stem cells: Theoretical simulation incorporating fluid mechanics. Electrophoresis 42(20), 2018 -2026 (2021)10.1002/elps.202000376 ↗
50. A. Habibian, H. Soleimanjahi, S. Hashemi, S. Babashah, Characterization and comparison of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant. Arch. Razi Inst. 77(4), 1383 (2022)
51. S. Wijenayake et al., Comparison of methods for pre-processing, exosome isolation, and RNA extraction in unpasteurized bovine and human milk. PloS One. 16(9), e0257633 (2021)10.1371/journal.pone.0257633 ↗
52. N. Valizadeh, T. Rabczuk, Isogeometric analysis of hydrodynamics of vesicles using a monolithic phase-field approach. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 388, 114191 (2022)10.1016/j.cma.2021.114191 ↗
53. M. Kraus, W. Wintz, U. Seifert, R. Lipowsky, Fluid vesicles in shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(17), 3685 (1996)10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3685 ↗
54. R. Luna, D.P. Heineck, E. Bucher, L. Heiser, S.D. Ibsen, Theoretical and experimental analysis of negative dielectrophoresis-induced particle trajectories. Electrophoresis. 43(12), 1366 -1377 (2022)10.1002/elps.202100372 ↗
55. R. Weiskirchen, S.K. Schröder, S. Weiskirchen, E.M. Buhl, B. Melnik, Isolation of bovine and human milk extracellular vesicles. Biomedicines. 11(10), 2715 (2023)10.3390/biomedicines11102715 ↗