journal article·2025-06

Theoretical analysis of hydrostatic pressure effect on binding energy and diamagnetic susceptibility of ground and excited states in semimagnetic double quantum wells

H. Azmi, K. El-Bakkari, A. Mazouz, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, R. Arraoui, A. Ed-Dahmouny, M. Jaafar, A. Sali, N. Amri, H. El Ghazi

Applied Physics A· Volume 131· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. S. Rolnik, J. Adamowski, Stark effect for donors in double quantum wells. Acta. Phys. Pol. A, 88(5) (1995)10.12693/APhysPolA.88.893 ↗
2. N. Angayarkanni, A. John Peter, C.W. Lee, Laser field induced interband absorption in a strained. Sol. Stat. Comm, 151, 1382–1387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2011.06.01110.1016/j.ssc.2011.06.011 ↗
3. I. Žutić, J. Fabian, S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
4. Y.V. Fetisov, A.S. Sigov, Spintronics: physical foundations and devices. Radioelectron. Nanosystems. Inf. Technol. 10, 343–356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17725/rensit.2018.10.34310.17725/rensit.2018.10.343 ↗
5. J.K. Furdyna, Diluted magnetic semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 64(4), R29–R64 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34170010.1063/1.341700 ↗
6. J.P. Lascaray, D. Coquillat, J. Deportes, A.K. Bhattacharjee, Zeeman splitting of exciton and magnetization in Cd1-xMnxTe: anomalous behavior at high x. Phys. Rev. B 38, 15 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.38.760210.1103/PhysRevB.38.7602 ↗
7. T. Kasuya, A. Yanase, Anomalous transport phenomena in Eu-chalcogenide alloys. Rev. Mod. Phys. 10(4), 684–696 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.40.68410.1103/RevModPhys.40.684 ↗
8. J. Gaj, R. Gal, M. Nawrocki, Giant exciton faraday rotation in Cd1-xMnxTe mixed crystals. Solid. State. Commun. 88, 193–195 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(93)90270-W10.1016/0038-1098(93)90270-W ↗
9. I.J. Sherly, P. Nithiananthi, Tuning the dynamics of bound magnetic polaron in asymmetric Cd1-x1Mnx1Te/Cd1-x2Mnx2Te semimagnetic concentric double quantum rings: through magnetic ion concentration and magnetic field. Physica. B Condens. Matter. 600, 412615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.41261510.1016/j.physb.2020.412615 ↗
10. Y. Ohno, D.K. Young, B. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, D.D. Awschalom, Electrical spin injection in a ferromagnetic semiconductor heterostructure. Nature 402, 790–792 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/4550910.1038/45509 ↗
11. S. Datta, B. Das, Electronic analog of the electro-optic modulator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665–667 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.10273010.1063/1.102730 ↗
12. C. Chappert, A. Fert, F.N. Van Dau, The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 813–823 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat202410.1038/nmat2024 ↗
13. A. Montes, A.L. Morales, C.A. Duque, Binding energy for a shallow donor impurity in GaAs-(Ga, Al)As quantum wells under hydrostatic pressure and applied electric field. Surf. Rev. Lett. 9, 1753–1756 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X0200434710.1142/S0218625X02004347 ↗
14. J.M. Leonora, A.J. Peter, C.K. Yoo, Effects of hydrostatic pressure on optical absorption and refractive index changes of exciton in semimagnetic CdMnTe quantum wells. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 9, 2122–2129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2012.262610.1166/jctn.2012.2626 ↗
15. A. Hakimyfard, M.G. Barseghyan, C.A. Duque, A.A. Kirakosyan, Simultaneous effects of pressure and temperature on donor binding energy in Pöschl-teller quantum well. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 404, 5159–5162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.08.29310.1016/j.physb.2009.08.293 ↗
16. J.W. González, N. Porras-Montenegro, C.A. Duque, Hydrostatic pressure and electric-field effects on the shallow donor impurity states in GaAs-Ga0.7Al0.3As quantum-well wires. Braz. J. Phys. 36(3), 944–947 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-9733200600060003910.1590/S0103-97332006000600039 ↗
17. G. Rezaei, S. Mousavi, E. Sadeghi, External electric field and hydrostatic pressure effects on the binding energy and self-polarization of an off-center hydrogenic impurity confined in a GaAs/AlGaAs square quantum well wire. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 407, 2637–2641 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2012.04.01410.1016/j.physb.2012.04.014 ↗
18. H. El Ghazi, A. Jorio, I. Zorkani, Pressure-dependent shallow donor binding energy in InGaN/GaN square QWWs. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 410, 49–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2012.10.02710.1016/j.physb.2012.10.027 ↗
19. A. Sali, J. Kharbach, A. Rezzouk, M. Ouazzani Jamil, The effects of polaronic mass and conduction band non-parabolicity on a donor binding energy under the simultaneous effect of pressure and temperature basing on the numerical FEM in a spherical quantum dot. Superlattices. Microstruct. 104, 93–103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.02.01410.1016/j.spmi.2017.02.014 ↗
20. G. Wang, X. Duan, W. Chen, Barrier thickness and hydrostatic pressure effects on hydrogenic impurity states in Wurtzite GaN/AlxGa1-xN strained quantum dots. J. Nanomate.r 2015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/93731010.1155/2015/937310 ↗
21. S.T. Perez-Merchancano, H. Paredes-Gutierrez, J. Silva-Valencia, Hydrostatic-pressure effects on the donor binding energy in GaAs-(Ga, Al)As quantum dots. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 19(2), 026225 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/2/02622510.1088/0953-8984/19/2/026225 ↗
22. A. Sali, H. Satori, The combined effect of pressure and temperature on the impurity binding energy in a cubic quantum dot using the FEM simulation. Superlattice. Microstruct. 69, 38–52 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.01.01110.1016/j.spmi.2014.01.011 ↗
23. J.J. Liu, M. Shen, S.W. Wang, The influence of compressive stress on shallow-donor impurity states in symmetric GaAs-Ga1-xAlxAs double quantum dots. J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.271758410.1063/1.2717584 ↗
24. A. Ed-Dahmouny, A. Sali, N. Es-Sbai, R. Arraoui, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, K. El-Bakkari, C.A. Duque, Combined effects of hydrostatic pressure and electric field on the donor binding energy, polarizability, and photoionization cross-section in double GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs quantum dots. Eur. Phys. J. B 95 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00400-210.1140/epjb/s10051-022-00400-2 ↗
25. A. Ed-Dahmouny, A. Sali, N. Es-Sbai, R. Arraoui, C.A. Duque, The impact of hydrostatic pressure and temperature on the binding energy, linear, third-order nonlinear, and total optical absorption coefficients and refractive index changes of a hydrogenic donor impurity confined in GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs double quantum dots. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03002-0.10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03002-0 ↗
26. R. Arraoui, K. El-Bakkari, K. Limame, A. Ed-Dahmouny, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, H. Azmi, A. Sali, Pressure and temperature influences on the nonlinear optical rectification of an impurity in a symmetrical double quantum dot. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03892-810.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03892-8 ↗
27. M. Jaouane, A. Sali, A. Ezzarfi, A. Fakkahi, R. Arraoui, Study of hydrostatic pressure, electric and magnetic fields effects on the donor binding energy in multilayer cylindrical quantum dots. Phys. E Low. Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 127, 114543 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2020.11454310.1016/j.physe.2020.114543 ↗
28. A. Fakkahi, H. Dakhlaoui, A. Sali, M. Jaouane, R. Arraoui, K. El-bakkari, A. Ed-Dahmouny, Pressure, temperature and electric field effects on the photoionization cross section in a multilayered spherical quantum dot. Eur. Phys. J Plus. 137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03462-410.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03462-4 ↗
29. A. KalaiPriya, S.K. Rao, S. Divya, N. Vijay, P. Jerome, T.H. Oh, B. Renganathan, D. Sastikumar, Engineering luminescent quantum dots through laser ablation of samarium oxide (Sm2O3): a novel approach for enhanced fiber optic gas sensing. Sens. Actuators. B Chem. 417, 136128 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.13612810.1016/j.snb.2024.136128 ↗
30. K. El-Bakkari, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, A. Ed-Dahmouny, R. Arraoui, H. Azmi, A. Sali, F. Ungan, Hydrogenic donor-related binding energy and diamagnetic susceptibility in multilayer cylindrical quantum dots under hydrostatic pressure. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-023-06834-410.1007/s00339-023-06834-4 ↗
31. R. Arraoui, A. Ed-Dahmouny, A. Sali, K. El-Bakkari, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, Tridimensional electric field effect on diamagnetic susceptibility and polarisability of a donor impurity in a double quantum dot. Philos. Magazine. 103, 1001–1016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2023.218015710.1080/14786435.2023.2180157 ↗
32. A.J. Peter, J. Ebenezar, Diamagnetic susceptibility of a confined donor in a quantum dot with different confinements. J. Sci. Res. 1, 200–208 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v1i2.118410.3329/jsr.v1i2.1184 ↗
33. K. Jayakumar, S. Balasubramanian, Binding energy of a donor in a quantum-well hetero structure. Phys. Rev. B 32(10), 6904–6906 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.690410.1103/PhysRevB.32.6904 ↗
34. H. Azmi, K. El Bbakkari, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, R. Arraoui, A. Ed Dahmouny, A. Sali, N. Amri, H. El Ghazi, C.A. Duque, Examining the influence of electric field on the photoionization cross section and spin polaronic shift in a semimagnetic double quantum well. Physica. B Condens. Matter. 696, 416647 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2024.41664710.1016/j.physb.2024.416647 ↗
35. A.J. Peter, Binding energies of ground and excited states of shallow donors in semimagnetic parabolic quantum dots. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5, 591–596 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2008.02110.1166/jctn.2008.021 ↗
36. H. Azmi, N. Amri, K. El-Bakkari, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, A. Sali, R. Arraoui, A. Ed-Dahmouny, Hydrostatic pressure, electric field, non-parabolicity and polaronic mass effects on the donor binding energy in a semimagnetic double quantum well. Eur. Phys. J Plus. 138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04603-z10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04603-z ↗
37. H. Azmi, N. Amri, P. Nithiananthi, M. Jaouane, K. El-Bakkari, A. Sali, A. Ed-Dahmouny, A. Fakkahi, R. Arraoui, Photoionization cross section in a strained semimagnetic double quantum well under hydrostatic pressure, nonparabolicity and polaronic mass effects. Physica. B Condens. Matter. 677, 415717 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2024.41571710.1016/j.physb.2024.415717 ↗
38. M.M. Gadzhaliev, M.I. Daunov, A.M. Musaev, Dependence of the permittivity of direct gap semiconductors on hydrostatic pressure. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 121, 263–266 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377611508004X10.1134/S106377611508004X ↗
39. J.M. Leonora, A.J. Peter, Temperature dependent optical properties in a strained diluted magnetic quantum well. E-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 10, 388–395 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1380/ejssnt.2012.38810.1380/ejssnt.2012.388 ↗
40. Z. Nourbakhsh, Structural, electronic and optical properties of ZnX and CdX compounds (X = Se, Te and S) under hydrostatic pressure. J. Alloys. Compd. 505, 698–711 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.12010.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.120 ↗
41. H.P. Zhou, Thesis: high pressure optical studies of semiconductors. The Faculty of Engineering of the University of Glasgow (1992)
42. R. André, J. Cibert, L.S. Dang, J. Zeman, M. Zigone, Nonlinear piezoelectricity: the effect of pressure on CdTe. Phys. Rev. B 53(11), 6951–6954 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.695110.1103/PhysRevB.53.6951 ↗
43. T. Kamizato, M. Matsuura, Excitons in double quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 40, 15–1989 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.837810.1103/PhysRevB.40.8378 ↗
44. X.N. Li, G.X. Wang, X.Z. Duan, Effects of electric field and hydrostatic pressure on the exciton states in strained zinc-blende InxGa1-xN-GaN coupled double quantum wells. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 157, 107311 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2023.10731310.1016/j.mssp.2023.107313 ↗
45. S.G. Jayam, K. Navaneethakrishnan, Optical properties of acceptors in a semimagnetic quantum well. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 16, 3737–3757 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797920201302X10.1142/S021797920201302X ↗
46. J.A. Gaj, R. Planel, G. Fishman, Relation of magneto-optical properties of free excitons to spin alignement of Mn2+ ions in Cd1-xMnxTe. Solid. State. Commun. 88, 927–930 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(93)90271-N10.1016/0038-1098(93)90271-N ↗
47. A.J. Peter, J. Liang Zheng, Spin polaron in a diluted parabolic magnetic quantum well. Commun. Theor. Phys. 53(4), 782–786 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/53/4/3710.1088/0253-6102/53/4/37 ↗
48. P. Kalpana, K. Jayakumar, Bound magnetic polaron in a semimagnetic double quantum well. Phys. E Low. Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 93, 252–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2017.06.02510.1016/j.physe.2017.06.025 ↗
49. A.M.J. De Reuben, K. Jayakumar, Shape effect of semimagnetic quantum dot on the bound magnetic polaron. Int. J. Nanosci. 10(04n05), 665–668 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X1100913110.1142/S0219581X11009131 ↗
50. B. Anitha, P. Nithiananthi, Dynamics of bound magnetic polaron in Cd1-xMnxTe/CdTe core/shell nanostructure. Conf Proc, American Institute of Physics Inc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511329410.1063/1.5113294 ↗
51. K. Jayakumar, P. Nithiananthi, Excited states of a magnetic polaron in a quantum well. J. Nano-Electron. Phys. 3, 383–387 (2011)
52. K. Jayakumar, S. Balasubramanian, M. Tomak, Low-lying excited states of a hydrogenic donor and resonant states in a quantum well. Phys. Rev. B 8, 15 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.879410.1103/PhysRevB.34.8794 ↗
53. D.K. Blanks, R.N. Bicknell, N.C. Giles-Taylor, J.F. Schetzina, A. Petrou, J. Warnock, Strain effects in Cd1-xMnxTe/CdTe superlattices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A: Vac., Surf. Films 4, 2120–2125 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.57404010.1116/1.574040 ↗
54. R. Arraoui, A. Sali, A. Ed-Dahmouny, M. Jaouane, A. Fakkahi, Polaronic mass and non-parabolicity effects on the photoionization cross section of an impurity in a double quantum dot. Superlattice. Microstruct. 159, 107049 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2021.10704910.1016/j.spmi.2021.107049 ↗
55. G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, Y.-J. Wang, X. Wu, F.M. Peeters, Electron effective mass and resonant polaron effect in CdTe/CdMgTe quantum wells. Phys. Stat. Solidi (b) 229, 597–600 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3951(200201)229:1<597::AID-PSSB597>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/1521-3951(200201)229:1<597::AID-PSSB597>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
56. G. Vignesh, P. Nithiananthi, Diamagnetic susceptibility: an indicator of pressure induced donor localization in a double quantum well. Superlattice. Microstruct. 92, 232–241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.01710.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.017 ↗
57. P. Nithiananthi, K. Jayakumar, Diamagnetic susceptibility of hydrogenic donor impurity in low-dimensional semiconducting systems. Solid. State. Commun. 137, 427–430 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2005.12.02510.1016/j.ssc.2005.12.025 ↗
58. P. Kalpana, A. M. J. D. Reuben, P. Nithiananthi, K. Jayakumar, Impurity States and diamagnetic susceptibility of a donor in a triangular quantum well. AIP Conf Proc, American Institute of Physics (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.498058510.1063/1.4980585 ↗
59. G. Vignesh, P. Nithiananthi, Quantum confinement of a hydrogenic donor in a double quantum well: Through diamagnetic susceptibility, AIP Conf Proc, American Institute of Physics Inc, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4917685.10.1063/1.4917685 ↗
60. A.L. Morales, C.A. Duque, N. Raigoza, A.L. Morales, Hydrostatic pressure effects on the donor impurity binding energy in symmetrical GaAs/Ga0.7Al0.3 As double quantum well. Revisita. Colombiana. de Fisica. 37, 199–202 (2005)
61. G.N. Carneiro, G. Weber, L.E. Oliveira, Binding energies and intra-donor absorption spectra in GaAs-GaAlAs quantum wells. Semicond. Sci. Technoi. 10, 4–5 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/10/1/00610.1088/0268-1242/10/1/006 ↗
62. R.L. Restrepo, G.L. Miranda, C.A. Duque, M.E. Mora-Ramos, Simultaneous effects of hydrostatic pressure and applied electric field on the impurity-related self-polarization in GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs multiple quantum wells. J. Lumin. 131, 1016–1021 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2011.01.01410.1016/j.jlumin.2011.01.014 ↗
63. G. Safarpour, A. Jamasb, M. Dialameh, S. Yazdanpanahi, The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the binding energy and diamagnetic susceptibility of a laser dressed donor impurity in a GaAs/GaAlAs nanowire superlattice. Superlattice. Microstruct. 76, 442–452 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.10.03010.1016/j.spmi.2014.10.030 ↗
64. P.S. Kalpana, P. Nithiananthi, K. Jayakumar, Donor states in a semimagnetic Cd1-xinMnxinTe/Cd1-xoutMnxoutTe double quantum well. Superlattice. Microstruct. 102, 246–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.12.04210.1016/j.spmi.2016.12.042 ↗
65. J.L. Zheng, Binding energy of hydrogenic impurity in GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs multi-quantum-dot structure. Phys. E Low. Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 40(9), 2879–2883 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2008.01.01710.1016/j.physe.2008.01.017 ↗
66. S. Chaudhuri, Hydrogenic-impurity ground state in GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs multiple-quantum-well structures. Phys. Rev. B 28(8), 4480–4488 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.28.448010.1103/PhysRevB.28.4480 ↗
67. C. Xia, Z. Zeng, S. Wei, Donor impurity in InGaN/GaN asymmetric multiple quantum wells. Phys. E Low. Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 42, 2416–2419 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2010.05.02810.1016/j.physe.2010.05.028 ↗
68. H. Zhang, X. Wang, J.F. Zhao, J.J. Liu, The binding energy of a hydrogenic impurity in self-assembled double quantum dots. Chinese. Phys. B 20(12), 127301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/20/12/12730110.1088/1674-1056/20/12/127301 ↗
69. S. Chaudhuri, K.K. Bajaj, Effect of nonparabolicity on the energy levels of hydrogenic donors in GaAs/Ga1-xAlxAs quantum-well structures. Phys. Rev. B 29(4), 1803–1806 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29.180310.1103/PhysRevB.29.1803 ↗
70. F.J. Betancur, I.D. Mikhailov, L.E. Oliveira, Shallow donor states in GaAs-(Ga, Al)As quantum dots with different potential shapes. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 31, 3391–3396 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/31/23/01310.1088/0022-3727/31/23/013 ↗
71. K. El-Bakkari, A. Sali, E. Iqraoun, A. Ezzarfi, Polaron and conduction band non-parabolicity effects on the binding energy, diamagnetic susceptibility and polarizability of an impurity in quantum rings. Superlattice. Microstruct. 148, 106729 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2020.10672910.1016/j.spmi.2020.106729 ↗
72. A. Fakkahi, A. Sali, M. Jaouane, R. Arraoui, A. Ed-Dahmouny, Study of photoionization cross section and binding energy of shallow donor impurity in multilayered spherical quantum dot. Phys. E Low. Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 143, 115351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2022.11535110.1016/j.physe.2022.115351 ↗