DataVXApplied Physics APaper
journal article·2025-06

Study on friction behavior of HMX crystals based on peridynamic theory

Mingchen Wang, Pengzhe Zhu, Jiacheng Rong, Yimeng Xu, Xiao Yun

Applied Physics A· Volume 131· Issue 6
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Li, Y. Liu, W. Ma, T. Fei, C. He, S. Pang, Tri-explosophoric groups driven fused energetic heterocycles featuring superior energetic and safety performances outperforms HMX. Nat. Commun. 13, 5697 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33413-710.1038/s41467-022-33413-7 ↗
2. R. Weese, J. Maienschein, C. Perrino, Kinetics of the β→ δ solid–solid phase transition of HMX, octahydro-1, 3, 5, 7-tetranitro-1, 3, 5, 7-tetrazocine. Thermochim. Acta. 401, 1–7 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(03)00050-910.1016/S0040-6031(03)00050-9 ↗
3. T. Zhou, J. Lou, Y. Zhang, H. Song, F. Huang, Hot spot formation and chemical reaction initiation in shocked HMX crystals with nanovoids: a large-scale reactive molecular dynamics study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 17627–17645 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp02015a10.1039/c6cp02015a ↗
4. Z. Yan, W. Liu, C. Zhang, J. Li, X. Xiang, M. Huang, W. Liao, Z. Yang, B. Tan, Z. Li, Scratch defects modulated hot spots generation in laser irradiated RDX crystals: a 3D FDTD simulation. J. Mater. Sci. 51, 8812–8823 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0086-210.1007/s10853-016-0086-2 ↗
5. R. Liu, P. Chen, X. Zhang, Effect of continuous damage accumulation on ignition of HMX-based polymer bonded explosives under low-velocity impact. Propellants. Explos. Pyrotech. 45, 1908–1919 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20200010710.1002/prep.202000107 ↗
6. J.G. Bennett, K.S. Haberman, J.N. Johnson, B.W. Asay, A constitutive model for the non-shock ignition and mechanical response of high explosives. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 46, 2303–2322 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00011-810.1016/S0022-5096(98)00011-8 ↗
7. G. Li, Y. Qu, R. Liu, H. Duan, J. Yu, H. He, Y. Yin, Friction-induced temperature rise at energetic β-HMX crystal interfaces: Part I. Role of contact pressure and speed under dry sliding friction. Tribol. Int. 199, 110006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2024.11000610.1016/j.triboint.2024.110006 ↗
8. S. Zeman, M. Jungová, Sensitivity and performance of energetic materials. Propellants. Explos. Pyrotech. 41, 426–451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20150035110.1002/prep.201500351 ↗
9. P. Zhao, F. Lu, R. Chen, Y. Lin, J. Li, L. Lu, G. Sun, A technique for combined dynamic compression-shear test. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.355782610.1063/1.3557826 ↗
10. G.R. Parker, M.D. Holmes, E.M. Heatwole, R.M. Broilo, M.N. Pederson, P.M. Dickson, Direct observation of frictional ignition in dropped HMX-based polymer-bonded explosives. Combust. Flame. 221, 180–193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.07.02810.1016/j.combustflame.2020.07.028 ↗
11. C.A. Duarte, R. Kohler, M. Koslowski, Dynamic fracture and frictional heating due to periodic excitation in energetic materials. J. Appl. Phys. 124, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.504872310.1063/1.5048723 ↗
12. Y. Wu, M.M. Chaudhri, Coefficients of sliding friction of single crystals of high explosives under different rubbing conditions. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 46, 035303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/3/03530310.1088/0022-3727/46/3/035303 ↗
13. Y. Yin, H. Li, Z. Cao, B. Li, Q. Li, H. He, J. Yu, Crystallographic orientation dependence on nanoscale friction behavior of energetic β-HMX crystal. Friction 11, 2264–2277 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0725-310.1007/s40544-022-0725-3 ↗
14. H.-T. Li, J. Sun, H.-L. Sui, C.-G. Chai, B.-H. Li, J.-X. Yu, H.-T. He, Y. Yin, Influencing mechanisms of a wax layer on the micro-friction behavior of the β-HMX crystal surface. Energetic. Mater. Front. 3, 248–256 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmf.2022.12.00110.1016/j.enmf.2022.12.001 ↗
15. Z. Cao, W. Zong, J. Zhang, C. He, J. Huang, W. Liu, Z. Wei, Molecular dynamics investigation of frictional decomposition behavior of HMX-tool interface in diamond cutting of HMX crystals. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 73, 508–515 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/ilt-12-2020-046510.1108/ilt-12-2020-0465 ↗
16. Y. Xiao, T. Gong, X. Zhang, Y. Sun, Multiscale modeling for dynamic compressive behavior of polymer bonded explosives. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 242, 108007 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10800710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.108007 ↗
17. T. Belytschko, N. Moës, S. Usui, C. Parimi, Arbitrary discontinuities in finite elements. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 50, 993–1013 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4%3c993::aid-nme164%3e3.0.co;2-m10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<993::aid-nme164>3.0.co;2-m ↗
18. D. Yang, X. He, X. Liu, Y. Deng, X. Huang, A peridynamics-based cohesive zone model (PD-CZM) for predicting cohesive crack propagation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 184, 105830 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10583010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105830 ↗
19. A. Khayyer, Y. Shimizu, C.H. Lee, A. Gil, H. Gotoh, J. Bonet, An improved updated Lagrangian SPH method for structural modelling. Comput. Part. Mech. 11, 1055–1086 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00673-z10.1007/s40571-023-00673-z ↗
20. T. Rabczuk, T. Belytschko, Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int. J. Numer. Methods. Eng. 61, 2316–2343 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.115110.1002/nme.1151 ↗
21. T. Rabczuk, T. Belytschko, A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 2777–2799 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.02010.1016/j.cma.2006.06.020 ↗
22. S.A. Silling, Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 48, 175–209 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/s0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
23. M. Dorduncu, H. Ren, X. Zhuang, S. Silling, E. Madenci, T. Rabczuk, A review of peridynamic theory and nonlocal operators along with their computer implementations. Comput. Struct. 299, 107395 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.10739510.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107395 ↗
24. E. Madenci, S. Oterkus, Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 86, 192–219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.01610.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.016 ↗
25. H. Ren, X. Zhuang, T. Rabczuk, A new peridynamic formulation with shear deformation for elastic solid. J. Micromech. Mol. Phys. 1, 1650009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/s242491301650009010.1142/s2424913016500090 ↗
26. S.A. Silling, Stability of peridynamic correspondence material models and their particle discretizations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 322, 42–57 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.04310.1016/j.cma.2017.03.043 ↗
27. P. Li, Z. Hao, W. Zhen, A stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamic model. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 339, 262–280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.00210.1016/j.cma.2018.05.002 ↗
28. A. Yaghoobi, M.G. Chorzepa, Higher-order approximation to suppress the zero-energy mode in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Comput. Struct. 188, 63–79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.03.01910.1016/j.compstruc.2017.03.019 ↗
29. A.F. Queiruga, G. Moridis, Numerical experiments on the convergence properties of state-based peridynamic laws and influence functions in two-dimensional problems. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 322, 97–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.04.01610.1016/j.cma.2017.04.016 ↗
30. J. Luo, V. Sundararaghavan, Stress-point method for stabilizing zero-energy modes in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 150, 197–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.06.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.06.015 ↗
31. E. Madenci, M. Dorduncu, A. Barut, M. Futch, Numerical solution of linear and nonlinear partial differential equations using the peridynamic differential operator. Numer. Methods. Partial. Differ. Equations. 33, 1726–1753 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/num.2216710.1002/num.22167 ↗
32. Z. Li, D. Huang, T. Rabczuk, H. Ren, Weak form of bond-associated peridynamic differential operator for thermo-mechanical analysis of orthotropic structures. Eur. J. Mech.-A/Solids 99, 104927 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10492710.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104927 ↗
33. H. Ren, X. Zhuang, T. Rabczuk, A nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 358, 112621 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11262110.1016/j.cma.2019.112621 ↗
34. T. Rabczuk, H. Ren, X. Zhuang, A nonlocal operator method for partial differential equations with application to electromagnetic waveguide problem. Comput, Mater. Continua. 59(1), 31–55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.0456710.32604/cmc.2019.04567 ↗
35. H. Ren, X. Zhuang, T. Rabczuk, A higher order nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 367, 113132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11313210.1016/j.cma.2020.113132 ↗
36. H. Ren, X. Zhuang, Y. Cai, T. Rabczuk, Dual-horizon peridynamics. Int. J. Numer. Methods. Eng. 108, 1451–1476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.525710.1002/nme.5257 ↗
37. H. Ren, X. Zhuang, T. Rabczuk, Dual-horizon peridynamics: a stable solution to varying horizons. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 318, 762–782 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.12.03110.1016/j.cma.2016.12.031 ↗
38. W.-K. Sun, L.-W. Zhang, K. Liew, A smoothed particle hydrodynamics–peridynamics coupling strategy for modeling fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 371, 113298 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11329810.1016/j.cma.2020.113298 ↗
39. Z. Dai, J. Xie, M. Jiang, A coupled peridynamics–smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for fracture analysis of fluid–structure interactions. Ocean. Eng. 279, 114582 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11458210.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114582 ↗
40. H. Fan, G.L. Bergel, S. Li, A hybrid peridynamics–SPH simulation of soil fragmentation by blast loads of buried explosive. Int. J. Impact. Eng. 87, 14–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.08.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.08.006 ↗
41. A. Jafari, M. Ezzati, A.A. Atai, Static and free vibration analysis of Timoshenko beam based on combined peridynamic-classical theory besides FEM formulation. Comput. Struct. 213, 72–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.11.00710.1016/j.compstruc.2018.11.007 ↗
42. W. Sun, J. Fish, P. Lin, Numerical simulation of fluid-driven fracturing in orthotropic poroelastic media based on a peridynamics-finite element coupling approach. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 158, 105199 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.10519910.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105199 ↗
43. S. Li, H. Lu, X. Huang, B. Zhang, J. Yang, Prediction of bearing capacities and fracture processes in open-hole plates using a hybrid model of peridynamics and FEM. Ocean Eng. 278, 114322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11432210.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114322 ↗
44. S. Liu, G. Fang, J. Liang, D. Lv, A coupling model of XFEM/peridynamics for 2D dynamic crack propagation and branching problems. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 108, 102573 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10257310.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102573 ↗
45. I.N. Giannakeas, T.K. Papathanasiou, A.S. Fallah, H. Bahai, Coupling XFEM and Peridynamics for brittle fracture simulation: part II—adaptive relocation strategy. Comput. Mech. 66, 683–705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01872-810.1007/s00466-020-01872-8 ↗
46. X. Chen, H. Yu, A multiscale method coupling peridynamic and boundary element models for dynamic problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 401, 115669 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11566910.1016/j.cma.2022.115669 ↗
47. Y. Yang, Y. Liu, Analysis of dynamic crack propagation in two-dimensional elastic bodies by coupling the boundary element method and the bond-based peridynamics. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 399, 115339 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11533910.1016/j.cma.2022.115339 ↗
48. T. Rabczuk, H. Ren, A peridynamics formulation for quasi-static fracture and contact in rock. Eng. Geol. 225, 42–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.00110.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.001 ↗
49. Y.-L. Hu, Y. Yu, H. Wang, Peridynamic analytical method for progressive damage in notched composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 108, 801–810 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.018 ↗
50. H. Wang, Y. Xu, D. Huang, A non-ordinary state-based peridynamic formulation for thermo-visco-plastic deformation and impact fracture. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 159, 336–344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.008 ↗
51. X. Wang, B. An, Q. He, P. Wang, W. Wang, J. Huang, Nonlocal thermomechanical coupled modeling method for two-dimensional rolling contact using a peridynamic approach. Appl. Math. Modell. 124, 86–108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2023.07.02310.1016/j.apm.2023.07.023 ↗
52. X. Wang, W. Dong, Q. He, B. An, H. Ding, P. Wang, W. Wang, J. Huang, Nonlocal thermomechanical coupled analysis of wheel-rail contact using a peridynamic model. Wear 528, 204954 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2023.20495410.1016/j.wear.2023.204954 ↗
53. X. Wang, S. Ma, W. Dong, X. Zhao, B. An, Q. He, H. Ding, P. Wang, W. Wang, Peridynamic modeling of rail wear during sliding contact considering thermal effects. Wear 532, 205110 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2023.20511010.1016/j.wear.2023.205110 ↗
54. K.K. Talamadupula, S.J. Povolny, N. Prakash, G.D. Seidel, Mesoscale strain and damage sensing in nanocomposite bonded energetic materials under low velocity impact with frictional heating via peridynamics. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 28, 085011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/abbfb910.1088/1361-651x/abbfb9 ↗
55. D. Kamensky, M. Behzadinasab, J.T. Foster, Y. Bazilevs, Peridynamic modeling of frictional contact. J. Peridyn. Nonlocal. Model. 1, 107–121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-019-00012-y10.1007/s42102-019-00012-y ↗
56. W. Lu, S. Oterkus, E. Oterkus, D. Zhang, Modelling of cracks with frictional contact based on peridynamics. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 116, 103082 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10308210.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103082 ↗
57. Q. Hu, X. Deng, W. Liu, Anisotropic peridynamic simulation of dynamic response of PBX containing polycrystalline HMX under low velocity impact. Eng. Anal. Boundary. Elem. 166, 105861 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.10586110.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105861 ↗
58. K.K. Talamadupula, S. Povolny, N. Prakash, G.D. Seidel, Piezoresistive detection of simulated hotspots and the effects of low velocity impact at the mesoscale in nanocomposite bonded energetic materials via multiphysics peridynamics modeling. Comput. Mater. Sci. 188, 110211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11021110.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110211 ↗
59. S.A. Silling, M. Epton, O. Weckner, J. Xu, E. Askari, Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J. Elast. 88, 151–184 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9125-110.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
60. H. Zhang, X. Zhang, Peridynamic analysis of materials interface fracture with thermal effect. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 120, 103420 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10342010.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103420 ↗
61. K.H. Hunt, F.R.E. Crossley, Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. (1975). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.342359610.1115/1.3423596 ↗
62. M. Isiet, I. Mišković, S. Mišković, Review of peridynamic modelling of material failure and damage due to impact. Int. J. Impact. Eng. 147, 103740 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10374010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103740 ↗
63. J. Guan, X. Yan, L. Guo, An adaptive contact model involving friction based on peridynamics. Eur. J. Mech.-A/Solids 100, 104966 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.10496610.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104966 ↗
64. J. Zhao, G. Lu, Q. Zhang, W. Du, Modelling of contact damage in brittle materials based on peridynamics. CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 129(2), 519–539 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.01726810.32604/cmes.2021.017268 ↗
65. R.W. Macek, S.A. Silling, Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite. Elem. Anal. Des. 43, 1169–1178 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2007.08.01210.1016/j.finel.2007.08.012 ↗
66. A. Olokun, T. Dillard, A. Dhiman, V. Tomar, Experimental study of anisotropic constitutive behavior of β-HMX crystals via nanoindentation and small-scale dynamic impact. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04862-410.1007/s42452-021-04862-4 ↗
67. A.C. Burch, J.D. Yeager, D.F. Bahr, Indentation fracture behavior of energetic and inert molecular crystals. J. Mater. Res. 34, 3954–3963 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.34510.1557/jmr.2019.345 ↗
68. X. Ma, J. Xu, L. Liu, P. Wang, Q. Feng, J. Xu, A 2D peridynamic model for fatigue crack initiation of railheads. Int. J. Fatigue. 135, 105536 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10553610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105536 ↗
69. H. Xu, S. Jahanmir, Effect of grain size on scratch damage and hardness of alumina. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 14, 736–739 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0025338610.1007/bf00253386 ↗
70. G. Subhash, M. Klecka, Ductile to brittle transition depth during single-grit scratching on alumina ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 3704–3707 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01970.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01970.x ↗
71. T.E. Wilantewicz, J.R. Varner, Vickers indentation behavior of several commercial glasses at high temperatures. J. Mater. Sci. 43, 281–298 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2174-910.1007/s10853-007-2174-9 ↗
72. Z. Qiu, C. Liu, H. Wang, X. Yang, F. Fang, J. Tang, Crack propagation and the material removal mechanism of glass–ceramics by the scratch test. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 64, 75–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.02110.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.021 ↗
73. K. Lee, K.P. Marimuthu, C.-L. Kim, H. Lee, Scratch-tip-size effect and change of friction coefficient in nano/micro scratch tests using XFEM. Tribol. Int. 120, 398–410 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2018.01.00310.1016/j.triboint.2018.01.003 ↗