BMZC modified ZIF-8/Si nanoporous pillar array for highly sensitive humidity detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. D.Z. Zhang, M.Y. Wang, M.C. Tang et al., Recent progress of diversiform humidity sensors based on versatile nanomaterials and their prospective applications. Nano Res. 16, 11938–11958 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4917-y10.1007/s12274-022-4917-y ↗
2. Z.H. Duan, Y.D. Jiang, H.L. Tai et al., Recent advances in humidity sensors for human body related humidity detection. J. Mater. Chem. 9, 14963–14980 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tc04180k10.1039/d1tc04180k ↗
3. B.A. Kuzubzsoglu, Recent studies on the humidity sensor: A mini review [J]. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 4(10), 4797–4807 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c0072110.1021/acsaelm.2c00721 ↗
4. M.M. Memon, Q. Liu, A. Manthar et al., Surface acoustic wave humidity sensor: A review. Micromachines. 14, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1405094510.3390/mi14050945 ↗
5. Y.Y. Lu, G. Yang, Y.J. Shen et al., Multifunctional flexible humidity sensor systems towards noncontact wearable electronics. Nano-Micro Letters (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00895-510.1007/s40820-022-00895-5 ↗
6. I. Muhammad, A. Sikander, K. Fnu et al., Flexible temperature and humidity sensors of plants for precision agriculture: Current challenges and future roadmap. Comput. Electron. Agric. 226, 109449 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.10944910.1016/j.compag.2024.109449 ↗
7. X.Q. Li, J.Y. Meng, Y.H. Guo et al., Preparation and performance of polypyrrole modified filter paper humidity sensor by in situ polymerization. Text. Res. J. 93, 1389–1400 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517522112802210.1177/00405175221128022 ↗
8. Y. Zhao, B. Yang, J. Liu et al., Effect of interdigital electrode gap on the performance of SnO2-modifified MoS2 capacitive humidity sensor. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 271, 256–263 (2018). j.snb.2018.05.08410.1016/j.snb.2018.05.084 ↗
9. N. Prasetya, S. Okur, Investigation of the free-base Zr-porphyrin MOFs as relative humidity sensors for an indoor setting [J]. Sens. Actuators A-Physical 377, 115713 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.11571310.1016/j.sna.2024.115713 ↗
10. P.P. Conti, P. Iacomi, M. Nicolas et al., MIL-101(Cr)@QCM and MIL-101(Cr)@IDE as sorbent-based humidity sensors for indoor air monitoring [J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 15(28), 33675–33681 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c0611910.1021/acsami.3c06119 ↗
11. Y. Zhang, J. Xiong, C. Chen, et al., Regulating the dissociation of LiCl and transportation of Li ions within UiO-66-NH2 framework for humidity sensing applications with superb comprehensive performances [J]. J.Alloys Compd. 818, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15285410.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152854 ↗
12. D. Muñoz-Gil, F.M.L. Figueiredo, High surface proton conduction in nanostructured ZIF-8 [J]. Nanomaterials 9(10), 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano910136910.3390/nano9101369 ↗
13. K. Wu, Y.L. Yu, Z.N. Hou et al., A humidity sensor based on ionic liquid modified metal organic frameworks for low humidity detection [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 355, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.13113610.1016/j.snb.2021.131136 ↗
14. K. Wu, X. Miao, H. Zhao et al., Selective encapsulation of ionic liquids in UiO-66-NH2 nanopores for enhanced humidity sensing [J]. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6(10), 9050–9058 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c0172710.1021/acsanm.3c01727 ↗
15. S.J. Kim, J. Lee, J.S. Bae et al., The impact of ZIF-8 particle size control on low-humidity sensor performance [J]. Nanomaterials 14, 284 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1403028410.3390/nano14030284 ↗
16. K. Wu, Q.X. He, Highly sensitive low humidity sensor by directional construction of ionic liquid functionalized MOF-303. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 425, 136992 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.13699210.1016/j.snb.2024.136992 ↗
17. M.H. Feng, X.J. Li, Capacitive humidity-sensing properties of ZnO nanorods/silicon nanoporous pillar array enhanced by LiCl incorporation [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 272, 543–549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.02310.1016/j.snb.2018.06.023 ↗
18. L.L. Yan, Y.T. Li, C.X. Hu et al., Temperature-dependent photoluminescence and mechanism of CdS thin film grown on Si nanoporous pillar array [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci. 349, 219–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.00110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.001 ↗
19. C. Chiappe, D. Capraro, V. Conte et al., Stereoselective halogenations of alkenes and alkynes in ionic liquids [J]. Org. Lett. 3(7), 1061–3 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/ol015631s10.1021/ol015631s ↗
20. W.H. Han, S.X. Liu, T.T. Xing et al., Controlled Synthesis of Micro-nano Crystals of ZIF-8 [J]. Chem. Industry Times 31(11), 15–19 (2017)
21. L.Y. Wang, M.Q. Fang, J. Liu et al., The influence of dispersed phases on polyamide/ZIF-8 nanofiltration membranes for dye removal from water [J]. RSC Adv. 5(63), 50942–50954 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra06185g10.1039/c5ra06185g ↗
22. Z.J. Zhang, S.K. Xian, H.X. Xi et al., Improvement of CO2 adsorption on ZIF-8 crystals modified by enhancing basicity of surface [J]. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66(20), 4878–4888 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.05110.1016/j.ces.2011.06.051 ↗
23. A.M.O. Mohamed, P. Krokidas, I.G. Economou, Encapsulation of [bmim+][Tf2N−] in different ZIF-8 metal analogues and evaluation of their CO2 selectivity over CH4 and N2 using molecular simulation [J]. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 5(7), 1230–1238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0me00021c10.1039/d0me00021c ↗
24. E.P.V. Sánchez, H. Gliemann, K. Haas-Santo et al., ZIF-8 SURMOF membranes synthesized by au-assisted liquid phase epitaxy for application in gas separation [J]. Chem. Ing. Tech. 88(11), 1798–1805 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.20160006110.1002/cite.201600061 ↗
25. D.B. Wang, Q.H. Tan, J.J. Liu et al., A stable europium metal-organic framework as a dual-functional luminescent sensor for quantitatively detecting temperature and humidity [J]. Dalton Trans. 45(46), 18450–18454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6dt03812c10.1039/c6dt03812c ↗
26. H. Kaur, G.C. Mohanat, V. Gupta et al., Synthesis and characterization of ZIF-8 nanoparticles for controlled release of 6-mercaptopurine drug [J]. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 41, 106–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2017.07.00410.1016/j.jddst.2017.07.004 ↗
27. D. Tuncel, A.N. Ökte, Improved adsorption capacity and photoactivity of ZnO-ZIF-8 nanocomposites [J]. Catal Today 361, 191–7 (2021)10.1016/j.cattod.2020.04.014 ↗
28. H.Y. Wang, X.J. Li, Structural and capacitive humidity sensing properties of nanocrystal magnetite/silicon nanoporous pillar array [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 110(2), 260–263 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.02.00410.1016/j.snb.2005.02.004 ↗
29. H.Y. Wang, X.J. Li, Capacitive humidity-sensing properties of Si-NPA and Fe3O4/Si-NPA [J]. Acta Phys Sin 54(5), 2220–2225 (2005). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.54.222010.7498/aps.54.2220 ↗
30. K. Wu, X.Y. Miao, Z.Y. Ma et al., Fast-response low humidity sensor based on ionic liquid functionalized MOF-801 by Solvent-Assisted Linker Exchange [J]. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43(11), 1969–1972 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2022.320503210.1109/LED.2022.3205032 ↗
31. J.X. Dai, T. Zhang, R.R. Qi et al., LiCl loaded cross-linked polymer composites by click reaction for humidity sensing [J]. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 253, 361–367 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.08210.1016/j.snb.2017.06.082 ↗
32. Y.M. Huo, M.M. Bu, Z.T. Ma et al., Flexible, non-contact and multifunctional humidity sensors based on two-dimensional phytic acid doped co-metal organic frameworks nanosheets [J]. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 607, 2010–2018 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.18910.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.189 ↗
33. Y. Gao, P.T. Jing, N. Yan et al., Dual-mode humidity detection using a lanthanide-based metal-organic framework: towards multifunctional humidity sensors [J]. Chem. Commun. 53, 4465–4468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cc01122a10.1039/c7cc01122a ↗
34. V. Manikandan, P. Iulian, S. Vigneselvan et al., Enhanced humidity sensing properties of Fe-doped CeO2 nanoparticles [J]. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 8815–8824 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03416-510.1007/s10854-020-03416-5 ↗
35. S. Ding, T. Yin, S. Zhang et al., Fast-speed, highly sensitive, flexible humidity sensors based on a printable composite of carbon nanotubes and hydrophilic polymers [J]. Langmuir 39, 1474–1481 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0282710.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02827 ↗
36. S. Zhu, X. Sun, X. Gao, et al., Equivalent circuit model recognition of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy via machine learning [J]. J. Electroanalytical Chem. 855, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.11362710.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113627 ↗
37. Y.L. Yu, Z.Y. Ma, X.Y. Miao et al., Humidity sensors based on cross-linked poly(ionic liquid)s for low humidity sensing [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 399, 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.13484010.1016/j.snb.2023.134840 ↗
38. D.Z. Zhang, M.Y. Wang, Z.M. Yang, Facile fabrication of graphene oxide/Nafion/indium oxide for humidity sensing with highly sensing capacitance response [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 292, 187–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.13310.1016/j.snb.2019.04.133 ↗
39. H.H. Huang, A.H. Sun, C.Y. Chu et al., Electrical and humidity sensing properties of graphene and polystyrene sulfonic sodium bilayer thin film [J]. Integr. Ferroelectr. 144(1), 127–134 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2013.78782810.1080/10584587.2013.787828 ↗
40. J. Wang, M.Y. Su, J.Q. Qi et al., Sensitivity and complex impedance of nanometer zirconia thick film humidity sensors [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 139(2), 418–424 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.03.07010.1016/j.snb.2009.03.070 ↗
41. J.J. Zhang, L. Sun, C. Chen et al., High performance humidity sensor based on metal organic framework MIL-101(Cr) nanoparticles [J]. J. Alloy. Compd. 695, 520–525 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.12910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.129 ↗
42. Y. He, T. Zhang, W. Zheng et al., Humidity sensing properties of BaTiO3 nanofiber prepared via electrospinning [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 146(1), 98–102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.02.03010.1016/j.snb.2010.02.030 ↗
43. L.L. Wang, X.C. Duan, W.Y. Xie et al., Highly chemoresistive humidity sensing using poly(ionic liquid)s [J]. Chem. Commun. 52(54), 8417–8419 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc04056j10.1039/c6cc04056j ↗
44. Y. Zhang, Z.H. Duan, H.F. Zou et al., Drawn a facile sensor: A fast response humidity sensor based on pencil-trace [J]. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 261, 345–353 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.17610.1016/j.snb.2018.01.176 ↗
45. K. Jiang, H.R. Zhao, J.X. Dai et al., Excellent Humidity sensor based on LiCl loaded hierarchically porous polymeric microspheres [J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8(38), 25529–25534 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0807110.1021/acsami.6b08071 ↗