journal article·2025-05Open access

Theoretical influence of ablator thickness on laser induced hydrodynamics in materials

Guillaume Duchateau, Pierre Pradel, Nicolas Bourdineaud, David Hébert, Frédéric Malaise

Applied Physics A· Volume 131· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract The studies on material response to hydrodynamic shock is a topic of large interest because it allows one to determine the material properties including the equation of state and the mechanical behavior, to evaluate the mechanical damage resistance, or to improve mechanical material properties including the adhesion between two materials. For such studies, the hydrodynamic shock can be induced by irradiating the target with a laser pulse where a so called ablator is commonly arranged on the target surface. This ablator allows one not to damage the target surface by the laser irradiation and, owing to other studies, allows one to better control the laser energy deposition and the subsequent amplitude of the induced pressure loading. Such a control of the pressure source term is simpler with a metallic ablator, especially with aluminum for which the laser absorption can be evaluated with a laser-matter interaction code. However, for parametric studies for instance, such an approach may be computationally expensive and possibly prohibitive. The use of an applied loading as boundary condition mimicking the laser-matter interaction then is an alternative. However, due to the various underlying assumptions of the boundary condition approach, it is thus not clear to which extent the latter is equivalent to the loading induced by laser-matter interaction. The present work first addresses this question by performing numerical simulations within various conditions including variations in the ablator thickness and in the laser pulse duration (nanosecond range). Aluminum and alumina are chosen for ablator and target, respectively, as materials of wide interest. Although significant ablation may take place, it is shown that an equivalence between the two loading procedures is obtained when the initial ablator thickness is used for the boundary condition approach. This result is related to the back-and-forth wave dynamics in the ablator initiated by the acoustic impedance mismatch between ablator and target material. This back-and-forth wave dynamics is in particular analyzed through analytical considerations. For a thick enough ablator, it is shown that the primary compression wave is followed by a secondary tensile wave. As a second study, the present work shows how one can take advantage of this generated tensile wave to test the adhesion between two materials. A procedure for laser shock adhesion test (LASAT) based solely on the arrangement of an ablator layer on the target then is proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. H.K. Amarchinta, R.V. Grandhi, K. Langer, D.S. Stargel, Material model validation for laser shock peening process simulation. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17(1), 015010 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/17/1/01501010.1088/0965-0393/17/1/015010 ↗
2. M. Arrigoni, M. Boustie, H.L. He, C. Bolis, L. Berthe, S. Barradas, M. Jeandin, Benefits of the impedance mismatch technique for LASer Shock Adhesion Test (LASAT). AIP Conf. Proc. 706(1), 1369–1372 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.178049210.1063/1.1780492 ↗
3. M. Ayad, L. Lapostolle, A. Rondepierre, C.L. Bras, S. Unaldi, C. Donik, U. Trdan, New methodology of dynamical material response of dissimilar FSWed Al alloy joint under high strain rate laser shock loading. Mater. Des. 222, 111080 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11108010.1016/j.matdes.2022.111080 ↗
4. M. Ayad, L. Lapostolle, A. Rondepierre, C. Le Bras, M. Scius-Bertrand, S. Unaldi, L. Berthe, Modeling of multi-edge effects in the case of laser shock loadings applied on thin foils: application for material characterization of aluminum alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 131(9), 095902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.008032610.1063/5.0080326 ↗
5. S. Bardy, B. Aubert, T. Bergara, L. Berthe, P. Combis, D. Hébert, L. Videau, Development of a numerical code for laser-induced shock waves applications. Opt. Laser Technol. 124, 105983 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10598310.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105983 ↗
6. L.M. Barker, R.E. Hollenbach, Laser interferometer for measuring high velocities of any reflecting surface. J. Appl. Phys. 43(1), 14669–4675 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166098610.1063/1.1660986 ↗
7. L. Berthe, M. Arrigoni, M. Boustie, J. Cuq-Lelandais, C. Broussillou, G. Fabre, M. Nivard, State-of-the-art laser adhesion test (LASAT). Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 26(3–4), 303–317 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2011.57355010.1080/10589759.2011.573550 ↗
8. R. Beuton, B. Chimier, J. Breil, D. Hébert, K. Mishchik, J. Lopez, G. Duchateau, Thermo-elasto-plastic simulations of femtosecond laser-induced multiple-cavity in fused silica. Appl. Phys. A (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-1743-x10.1007/s00339-018-1743-x ↗
9. R. Beuton, B. Chimier, P. Quinoman, P.G.A. de Martínez, R. Nuter, G. Duchateau, Numerical studies of dielectric material modifications by a femtosecond Bessel–Gauss laser beam. Appl. Phys. A (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04476-y10.1007/s00339-021-04476-y ↗
10. C. Bolis, L. Berthe, M. Boustie, M. Arrigoni, S. Barradas, M. Jeandin, Physical approach to adhesion testing using laser-driven shock waves. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40(10), 3155 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/10/01910.1088/0022-3727/40/10/019 ↗
11. C. Correa, L.R. de Lara, M. Diaz, J. Porro, A. Garcia-Beltran, J. Ocana, Influence of pulse sequence and edge material effect on fatigue life of al2024-t351 specimens treated by laser shock processing. Int. J. Fatigue 70, 196–204 (2015)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.015 ↗
12. D. Courapied, L. Berthe, P. Peyre, F. Coste, J.-P. Zou, A.-M. Sautivet, Laser-delayed double shock-wave generation in water-confinement regime. J. Laser Appl. 27(S2), S29101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2351/1.490638210.2351/1.4906382 ↗
13. K. Eidmann, J. Meyer-ter Vehn, T. Schlegel, S. Hüller, Hydrodynamic simulation of subpicosecond laser interaction with solid-density matter. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1202–1214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.120210.1103/PhysRevE.62.1202 ↗
14. R. Fabbro, P. Peyre, L. Berthe, X. Scherpereel, Physics and applications of laser-shock processing. J. Laser Appl. 10(6), 265–279 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2351/1.52186110.2351/1.521861 ↗
15. R. Fabbro, P. Peyre, L. Berthe, A. Sollier, E. Bartnicki, Physics and applications of laser shock processing of materials, in High-power lasers in manufacturing, vol. 3888, ed. by X. Chen, T. Fujioka, A. Matsunawa (SPIE, 2000), pp.155–164. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.37701210.1117/12.377012 ↗
16. B.P. Fairand, B.A. Wilcox, W.J. Gallagher, D.N. Williams, Laser shock?induced microstructural and mechanical property changes in 7075 aluminum. J. Appl. Phys. 43(9), 3893–3895 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166183710.1063/1.1661837 ↗
17. Y. Fan, Y. Wang, S. Vukelic, Y.L. Yao, Wave-solid interactions in laser-shock-induced deformation processes. J. Appl. Phys. 98(10), 104904 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.213488210.1063/1.2134882 ↗
18. M. Ghrib, L. Berthe, N. Mechbal, M. Rébillat, M. Guskov, R. Ecault, N. Bedreddine, Generation of controlled delaminations in composites using symmetrical laser shock configuration. Compos. Struct. 171, 286–297 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.039 ↗
19. J. Grun, R. Decoste, B.H. Ripin, J. Gardner, Characteristics of ablation plasma from planar, laser-driven targets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 39(7), 545–547 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.9278810.1063/1.92788 ↗
20. V. Gupta, A. Argon, D. Parks, J. Cornie, Measurement of interface strength by a laser spallation technique. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40(1), 141–180 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(92)90296-E10.1016/0022-5096(92)90296-E ↗
21. T. Géral, E. Lescoute, B. Jodar, A. Sollier, GCLT: a versatile high power laser facility for high-energy-density (HED) physics applications. AIP Conf. Proc. 3066(1), 450002 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/12.003243110.1063/12.0032431 ↗
22. Y. Hu, Z. Yao, J. Hu, 3-D FEM simulation of laser shock processing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201(3), 1426–1435 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.02.01810.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.02.018 ↗
23. S. Huang, Z. Fu, C. Liu, C. Wang, Opt. Laser Technol. 158, 108796 (2023)10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108796 ↗
24. S. Kalainathan, S. Prabhakaran, Recent development and future perspectives of low energy laser shock peening. Opt. Laser Technol. 81, 137–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.02.00710.1016/j.optlastec.2016.02.007 ↗
25. J.T. Larsen, S.M. Lane, Hyades-a plasma hydrodynamics code for dense plasma studies. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 51(1), 179–186 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(94)90078-710.1016/0022-4073(94)90078-7 ↗
26. H. Liang, S. Zhao, H. Yu, L. Jiang, Z. Zhang, X. Lin, Compos. B Eng. 275, 111295 (2024)10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111295 ↗
27. R. Liotard, B. Canaud, A. Pineau, A. Sollier, E. Lescoute, A. Colaïtis, G. Duchateau, Solid-to-plasma transition of polystyrene induced by a nanosecond laser pulse within the context of inertial confinement fusion. Phys. Rev. E 109, 065207 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.06520710.1103/PhysRevE.109.065207 ↗
28. P. Mylavarapu, C. Bhat, M. Perla, K. Banerjee, K. Gopinath, T. Jayakumar, Identification of critical material thickness for eliminating back reflected shockwaves in laser shock peening—a numerical study. Opt. Laser Technol. 142, 107217 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10721710.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107217 ↗
29. J. Phipps, T.P. Turner, R.F. Harrison, G.W. York, W.Z. Osborne, G.K. Anderson, T.R. King, Impulse coupling to targets in vacuum by KrF, HF, and CO$$_2$$ single-pulse lasers. J. Appl. Phys. 64(3), 1083–1096 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34186710.1063/1.341867 ↗
30. R. Qin, Z. Zhang, Z. Hu, Z. Du, X. Xiang, G. Wen, W. He, On-line evaluation and monitoring technology for material surface integrity in laser shock peening—a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 313, 117851 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11785110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117851 ↗
31. R. Ramis, K. Eidmann, J. MeyerTerVehn, S. Huller, MULTI-fs—a computer code for laser-plasma interaction in the femtosecond regime. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183(3), 637–655 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2011.10.01610.1016/j.cpc.2011.10.016 ↗
32. A. Rubenchik, M. Feit, M. Perry, J. Larsen, Numerical simulation of ultra-short laser pulse energy deposition and bulk transport for material processing1work at lawrence livermore national laboratory performed under the auspices of the us department of energy under contract no. w-7405-eng-48.1. Appl. Surf. Sci. 127–129, 193–198 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00631-410.1016/S0169-4332(97)00631-4 ↗
33. M. Sagnard, R. Ecault, F. Touchard, M. Boustie, L. Berthe, Development of the symmetrical laser shock test for weak bond inspection. Opt. Laser Technol. 111, 644–652 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.10.05210.1016/j.optlastec.2018.10.052 ↗
34. M. Scius-Bertrand, L. Videau, A. Rondepierre, E. Lescoute, Y. Rouchausse, J. Kaufman, L. Berthe, Laser induced plasma characterization in direct and water confined regimes: new advances in experimental studies and numerical modelling. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 54(5), 055204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abc04010.1088/1361-6463/abc040 ↗
35. Y. Watanabe, S. Fujisawa, A. Yonezu, X. Chen, Quantitative evaluation of adhesion quality of surface coating by using pulse laser-induced ultrasonic waves. Surf. Coat. Technol. 286, 231–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.12.02610.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.12.026 ↗
36. J. Wu, J. Zhao, H. Qiao, Y. Lu, B. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Yang, A method to determine the material constitutive model parameters of fgh4095 alloy treated by laser shock processing. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 1, 100029 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.10002910.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100029 ↗