journal article·2025-01

Efficient removal of phenol pollutants with CuO nanorods and nanoparticles as a reusable heterogeneous catalysts

Khalid Abdelazez Mohamed Ahmed

Applied Physics A· Volume 131· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. S.M. Dizaj, F. Lotfipour, M. Barzegar-Jalali, M.H. Zarrintan, K. Adibkia, Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 44, 278–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.03110.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031 ↗
2. V. Scagnoli, U. Staub, Y. Bodenthin, R.A. de Souza, M. García-Fernández, M. Garganourakis, A.T. Boothroyd, D. Prabhakaran, S.W. Lovesey, Observation of orbital currents in CuO. Sci. 332, 696–698 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.120106110.1126/science.1201061 ↗
3. S. Anandan, X. Wen, S. Yang, Room temperature growth of CuO nanorod arrays on copper and their application as a cathode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater. Chem. Phys. 93, 35–40 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.02.00210.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.02.002 ↗
4. R.P. Allaker, G. Ren, Potential impact of nanotechnology on the control of infectious diseases. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop Med. Hyg. 102, 1–2 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.07.00310.1016/j.trstmh.2007.07.003 ↗
5. N.D. Hoa, S.Y. An, N.Q. Dung, N.V. Quy, D. Kim, Synthesis of p-type semiconducting cupric oxide thin films and their application to hydrogen detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 146, 239–244 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.02.04510.1016/j.snb.2010.02.045 ↗
6. R. Poreddy, C. Engelbrekt, A. Riisager, Copper oxide as efficient catalyst for oxidative dehydrogenation of alcohols with air. Catal. Sci. Tech. 5, 2467–2477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY01622J10.1039/C4CY01622J ↗
7. M. Zhu, G. Diao, High catalytic activity of CuO nanorods for oxidation of cyclohexene to 2-cyclohexene-1-one. Catal. Sci. Tech. 2, 82–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CY00274K10.1039/C1CY00274K ↗
8. L. Chen, L. Li, G. Li, Synthesis of CuO nanorods and their catalytic activity in the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate. J. Alloys Compds 464, 532–536 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.05810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.058 ↗
9. A.S. Azhariyah, A. Pradyasti, S. Bismo, Preparation and characterization of copper oxide catalyst with activated carbon support for ozone decomposition in industrial environment. Earth Environ. Sci. 105, 012012 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/01201210.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012012 ↗
10. S.I. Siddiqui, M. Naushad, S.A. Chaudhry, Promising prospects of nanomaterials for arsenic water remediation: A comprehensive review. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 126, 60–97 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.03.03710.1016/j.psep.2019.03.037 ↗
11. K.J. Reddy, K.J. McDonald, H. King, A novel arsenic removal process for water using cupric oxide nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 397, 96–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.04110.1016/j.jcis.2013.01.041 ↗
12. P. Samarasekara, N. Kumara, N. Yapa, Sputtered copper oxide (CuO) thin films for gas sensor devices. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 2417 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/8/00710.1088/0953-8984/18/8/007 ↗
13. M. Ramesh, CuO as efficient photo catalyst for photocatalytic decoloration of wastewater containing Azo dyes. Water Practice Technol. 16, 1078 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.06710.2166/wpt.2021.067 ↗
14. A. Dabrowski, P. Podkoscielny, Z. Hubicki, M. Barczak, Adsorption of phenolic compounds by activated carbon-a critical review. Chemosphere 58, 1049–1070 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.06710.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.067 ↗
15. M.C. Burleigh, M.A. Markowitz, M.S. Spector, B.P. Gaber, Porous polysilsesquioxanes for the adsorption of phenols. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(11), 2515–2518 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/es011115l10.1021/es011115l ↗
16. O. Chedeville, M. Debaccq, M.F.A. Almanza, C. Porte, Use of an ejector for phenol containing water treatment by ozonation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 57, 201–208 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.04.00410.1016/j.seppur.2007.04.004 ↗
17. H. Chen, A. Sayari, A. Adnot, F. Larachi, Composition-activity effects of Mn-Ce-O composites on phenol catalytic wet oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 32(3), 195–204 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00136-910.1016/S0926-3373(01)00136-9 ↗
18. Y. Yan, S. Jiang, H. Zhang, Catalytic wet oxidation of phenol with Fe–ZSM-5 catalysts. RSC Adv. 6, 3850–3859 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA19832A10.1039/C5RA19832A ↗
19. F. Sprang, J.D. Herszman, S.R. Waldvogel, Electrochemical oxidation of phenols in flow: A versatile and scalable access to para-benzoquinones. Green Chem. 24, 5116–5124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC01296K10.1039/D2GC01296K ↗
20. M.J. Pacheco, A. Morao, A. Lopes, L. Ciriaco, I. Goncalves, Degradation of phenols using boron-doped diamond electrodes: A method for quantifying the extent of combustion. Electrochim. Acta 53(2), 629–636 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.02410.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.024 ↗
21. A. Nickheslat, M.M. Amin, H. Izanloo, A. Fatehizadeh, S.M. Mousavi, Phenol photocatalytic degradation by advanced oxidation process under ultraviolet radiation using titanium dioxide. J. Environ. Public Health 2013, 815310–815319 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/81531010.1155/2013/815310 ↗
22. D. Vione, C. Minero, V. Maurino, A.E. Carlotti, T. Picatonotto, E. Pelizzetti, Degradation of phenol and benzoic acid in the presence of a TiO2-based heterogeneous photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 58(1–2), 79–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.11.01810.1016/j.apcatb.2004.11.018 ↗
23. R. Nayak, F.A. Ali, D.K. Mishra, D. Ray, V.K. Aswal, S.K. Sahoo, B. Nanda, Fabrication of CuO nanoparticle: An efficient catalyst utilized for sensing and degradation of phenol. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 11045–11059 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.10010.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.100 ↗
24. Y.B. Feng, L. Hong, A.-L. Liu, W.-D. Chen, G.-W. Li, W. Chen, X.-H. Xia, High-efficiency catalytic degradation of phenol based on the peroxidase-like activity of cupric oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.. 12, 653–660 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0442-610.1007/s13762-013-0442-6 ↗
25. O.P. Ferreira, L. Otubo, R. Romano, O.L. Alves, One-dimensional nanostructures from layered manganese oxide. Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 601–606 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/cg050350310.1021/cg0503503 ↗
26. M.H. Huang, S. Mao, H. Feick, H. Yan, Y. Wu, H. Kind, E. Webber, R. Russo, P. Yang, Room-temperature ultraviolet nanowire nanolasers. Science 292, 1897–1899 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.106036710.1126/science.1060367 ↗
27. K.A.M. Ahmed, H.A. Abbood, K. Huang, Hydrothermal synthesis of Mn(OH)O nanowires and their thermal conversion to (1D)-manganese oxides nanostructures. J. Cryst. Growth 358, 33–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.00210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.002 ↗
28. C.L. Zhu, C.N. Chen, L.Y. Hao, Y. Hu, Z.Y. Chen, In-situ preparation of 1D CuO nanostructures using Cu2(OH)2CO3 nanoribbons as precursor for sacrifice-template via heat-treatment. Solid State Commun. 130, 681–768 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2004.03.03110.1016/j.ssc.2004.03.031 ↗
29. C.L. Zhu, C.N. Chen, L.Y. Hao, Y. Hu, Z.Y. Chen, Template-free synthesis of Cu 2Cl(OH)3 nanoribbons and use as sacrificial template for CuO nanoribbon. J. Cryst. Growth 263, 473–479 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.11.00310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.11.003 ↗
30. D.P. Singh, A.K. Ojha, O.N. Srivastava, Synthesis of different Cu(OH)2 and CuO (Nanowires, rectangles, seed-, belt-, and Sheetlike) nanostructures by simple wet chemical route. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 3409–3418 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp804832g10.1021/jp804832g ↗
31. R. Al-Gaashani, S. Radiman, N. Tabet, A. Razak Daud, Synthesis and optical properties of CuO nanostructures obtained via a novel thermal decomposition method. J. Alloys Compds. 509, 8761–8769 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.05610.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.056 ↗
32. V. Golthi, J. Kommu, K.K. Penmethsa, J.L. Mangamma, Green synthesis of CuO nanorods using Jatropha podagrica leaf extract for dye degradation and antibacterial applications. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-024-00372-x10.1007/s41204-024-00372-x ↗
33. L. Kong, H. Chu, Z. Li, S. Gao, Z. Pan, H. Pan, S. Zhao, D. Li, The generation of noise-like pulses and various solitons with CuO nanorods as a broadband saturable absorber. J. Alloys Compds 984, 173965 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17396510.1016/j.jallcom.2024.173965 ↗
34. J. Kim, T. Begildayeva, J. Theerthagiri, C.J. Moon, A. Min, S.J. Lee, G.-A. Kim, M.Y. Choi, Manifolding active sites and in situ/operando electrochemical-Raman spectroscopic studies of single-metal nanoparticle-decorated CuO nanorods in furfural biomass valorization to H2 and 2-furoic acid. J. Energy Chem. 84, 50–61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2023.05.04210.1016/j.jechem.2023.05.042 ↗
35. T.T. Ha, B.T. Cong, P.N. Hai, N. Hoang, H.V. Chinh, B.T. Huong, N.T. Linh, B.T. Son, T.T.Q. Hoa, N.V. Tuye, Preparation of CuO nanorods by thermal oxidation in ozone ambient. J. Sci. Math. Phys. 38, 9–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1124/vnumap.464210.25073/2588-1124/vnumap.4642 ↗
36. K. Mansi, R. Kumar, D. Narula, S.K. Pandey, V. Kumar, K. Singh, Microwave-induced CuO nanorods: A comparative approach between curcumin, quercetin, and rutin to study their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer effects against normal skin cells and human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T-47D. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 5, 5762–5778 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c0076910.1021/acsabm.2c00769 ↗
37. K.M. Shrestha, C.M. Sorensen, K.J. Klabund, Synthesis of CuO nanorods, reduction of CuO into Cu nanorods, and diffuse reflectance measurements of CuO and Cu nanomaterials in the near infrared region. Phys. Chem. C C 114, 14368–14376 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103761h10.1021/jp103761h ↗
38. Y. Cai, F. Yang, L. Wu, Y. Shu, G. Qu, A. Fakhri, V.K. Gupta, Hydrothermal-ultrasonic synthesis of CuO nanorods and CuWO4 nanoparticles for catalytic reduction, photocatalysis activity, and antibacterial properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 258, 123919 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12391910.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123919 ↗
39. E. Emerson, The Condensation of aminoantipyrine. II. a new color test for phenolic compounds. J. Org. Chem. 8, 417–428 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01193a00410.1021/jo01193a004 ↗
40. S. Karthick Kumar, S. Murugesan, S. Suresh, Preparation and characterization of CuO nanostructures on copper substrate as selective solar absorbers. Mater. Chem. Phys. 143, 1209–1214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.02310.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.023 ↗
41. N. Salah, A.M. Alfawzan, W. Allafi, N. Baghdadi, A. Saeed, A. Alshahrie, W.M. Al-Shawafi, A, Memic, size- controlled, single-crystal CuO nanosheets and the resulting polyethylene-carbon nanotube nanocomposite as antimicrobial materials. Polym. Bull. 78, 261–281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03112-810.1007/s00289-020-03112-8 ↗
42. T. Nakajima, K. Kajiwara, J.E. McIntyre, Advanced fiber spinning technology. Book (1994). https://doi.org/10.1533/978184569321310.1533/9781845693213 ↗
43. Y. Xu, S. Qin, M.I. Wang, Z. Du, J. Chen, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, Efficient peroxodisulfate activation by CuO-loaded chitosan hydrogel spheres for phenol degradation in the coexistence of NaHCO3. J. Water Process Eng. 61, 105229 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.10522910.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105229 ↗
44. S. Guo, Y. Jiang, L. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhuang, Y. Yu, Thin CuOx-based nanosheets for efficient phenol removal benefited from the structural memory and Ion exchange of layered double oxides. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain. 6, 4167–4178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA10877J10.1039/C7TA10877J ↗
45. K. Yuney, A.A. Oladipo, M. Gazi, D.Z. Younis, CuO coated olive cake nanocomposites for rapid phenol removal and effective discoloration of high strength olive mill wastewater. Chemosphere 253, 126703 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12670310.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126703 ↗
46. D. He, H. Zhang, Y. Yan, Chemical vapor deposition of CuO on ZSM-5 membrane for catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol in a fixed bed reactor. RSC Adv. 7, 47435 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra09676c10.1039/c7ra09676c ↗
47. D.S. Paz, E.L. Foletto, D.A. Bertuol, S.L. Jahn, G.C. Collazzo, S.S. da Silva, O. Chiavone-Filho, CAO do nascimento, CuO/ZnO coupled oxide films obtained by the electrodeposition technique and their photocatalytic activity in phenol degradation under solar irradiation. Water Sci. Technol. 68, 1031–1036 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.34510.2166/wst.2013.345 ↗
48. R.-M. Liou, S.-H. Chen, CuO impregnated activated carbon for catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol. J. Hazard. Mater. 172, 498–506 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.01210.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.012 ↗
49. L. Yang, D. Chu, L. Wang, Porous hexapod CuO nanostructures: precursor-mediated fabrication, characterization, and visible-light induced photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Mater. Lett. 160, 246–249 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.13310.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.133 ↗
50. J. Arun, S. Nachiappan, G. Rangarajan, R.P. Alagappan, K.P. Gopinath, E. Lichtfouse, Synthesis and application of titanium dioxide photocatalysis for energy, decontamination and viral disinfection: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 21, 339–362 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01503-z10.1007/s10311-022-01503-z ↗