Texture measurements of archaeological objects at STRESS-SPEC neutron diffractometer
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The main advantage of neutron diffraction over X-ray diffraction, arises from the fact that the interaction of neutrons with material is relatively weak and not related to the number of electrons, and consequently the penetration depth of neutrons is about 102-103 larger than that of laboratory X-ray diffraction. This is particular essential for the non-destructive texture analysis of archaeological objects as no additional surface treatments of the samples (e.g. polishing) are necessary. STRESS-SPEC at MLZ is designed as a state of the art multi-purpose diffractometer for strain and texture analysis. Besides the optimized high neutron flux the available large variability in gauge volume definition systems together with the robotic sample handling option offer high flexibility for bulk or gradient texture measurements. Since 2014, local and bulk textures of iron and gold artefacts collected by Bavarian State Archaeological Collection (Munich, Germany) have been thoroughly investigated at STRESS-SPEC. Results showed that heat treatment of iron artefacts at high temperatures can re-orientate the inner crystallites. In the gold foil artefacts, the texture represented by the measured pole figures shows a high symmetry – the so-called Cube component, which is commonly found in annealed fcc materials. For comparison, laboratory samples were produced by rolling, flat hammering, and pin / round hammering and also measured in order to elucidate possible manufacturing and processing routes. In turned out that both rolling and pin / round hammering followed by a high temperature annealing can produce similar pole figures to those of the gold artefacts foils.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Physics and Applications · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. H.J. Bunge, Advantages of Neutron Diffraction in texture analysis. Text. Microstruct. 10, 265–307 (1989)10.1155/TSM.10.265 ↗
2. J. Hirsch, Textures in industrial processes and products. Mater. Sci. Forum. 702–703, 18–25 (2012)
3. G. Artioli, Crystallographic texture analysis of archaeological metals: interpretation of manufacturing techniques. Appl. Phy A 89, 899–908 (2007)10.1007/s00339-007-4215-2 ↗
4. N. Kardjilov, G. Festa, Neutron Methods for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (Springer, 2017)10.1007/978-3-319-33163-8 ↗
5. H.-G. Brokmeier, Advances and applications of Neutron texture analysis. Text. Microstruct. 33, 13–33 (1999)10.1155/TSM.33.13 ↗
6. H.-G. Brokmeier, Neutron Diffraction texture analysis of Multi-phase systems. Text. Microstruct. 10, 13–33 (1989)
7. W. Kockelmann, S. Siano, L. Bartoli, D. Visser, P. Hallebeek, R. Traum, A. Linke, Schreiner, Kirfel, Applications of TOF neutron diffraction in archaeometry. Appl. Phys. A83, 175–182 (2006)10.1007/s00339-006-3503-6 ↗
8. H.-R. Wenk, Van P. Houtte, Texture and anisotropy. Rep. Prog Phys. 67, 1367–1428 (2004)10.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R02 ↗
9. Y.X. Xie, L. Lutterotti, H.R. Wenk, F. Kovacs, Texture analysis of ancient coins with TOF neutron diffraction. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 3329–3337 (2004)10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026933.28906.19 ↗
10. S. Siano, L. Bartoli, M. Daymond, M. Miccio, Non-deestructive investigation of brone artefacts from the marches National Musium of archaeology using neutron diffraction. Archaeometry. 48, 77–96 (2006)10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00244.x ↗
11. R. Arletti, L. Cartechini, R. Rinaldi, S. Giovannini, W. Kockelmann, A. Cardarelli, Texture analysis of bronze age axes by neutron diffraction. Appl. Phys. A90, 9–4 (2008)
12. M. Hofmann, W.M. Gan, J. Rebelo Kornmeier, STRESS-SPEC: materials science diffractometer. J. Large-scale Res. Fac. A6, 1 (2015)
13. H.-G. Brokmeier, W.M. Gan, C. Randau, M. Völler, J. Rebelo-Kornmeier, M. Hofmann, Texture analysis at neutron diffractometer STRESS-SPEC. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A642, 87–92 (2011)10.1016/j.nima.2011.04.008 ↗
14. C. Randau, H.G. Brokmeier, W.M. Gan, M. Hofmann, M. Voeller, W. Tekouo, N. Al-hamdany, G. Seidl, A. Schreyer, Improved sample manipulation at the STRESS-SPEC neutron diffractometer using an industrial 6-axis robot for texture and strain analyses. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A794, 67–75 (2015)10.1016/j.nima.2015.05.014 ↗
15. A. Fedrigo, F. Grazzi, A.R. Williams, T. Panzner, K. Lefmann, P.E. Lindelof, L. Jørgensen, P. Pentz, A. Scherillo, F. Porcher, M. Strobl, Extraction of archaeological information from metallic artefacts-A neutron diffraction study on viking swords. J. Arch. Sci. Rep. 12, 425–436 (2017)
16. R. Gebhard, W. Häusler, M. Moosauer, U. Wagner, Remnants of a bronze age Rampart in Upper Bavaria: a Mössbauer Study. Hyperfine Interact. 154, 181–197 (2004)10.1023/B:HYPE.0000032076.38155.f7 ↗
17. E.J. Kluge, C. Stieghorst, F.E. Wagner, R. Gebhard, Z. Révay, J. Jolie, Archaeometry at the PGAA facility of MLZ - prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis and neutron tomography. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 20, 303–306 (2018)
18. J. Müller, S. Delgado-Raack, N. Escanilla, L. Kienle, J. Kneisel, J. Czebreszuk, M. Jaeger, M. Szmyt, U. Schürmann, First evidence for the forging of gold in an early bronze age site of Central Europe (2200 – 1800 BCE). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep., 47 (2023)10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103748 ↗
19. B. Armbruster, Gold technology of the ancient scythians - gold from the kurgan Arzhan 2, Tuva. Archeo Sci. 33, 187–193 (2009)
20. F.E. Wagner, R. Gebhard, W.M. Gan, M. Hofmann, The metallurgical texture of gold artefacts found at the bronze age rampart of Bernstorf (Bavaria) studied by neutron diffraction. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 20, 338–346 (2018)
21. R. Gebhard, R. Krause, Archaeological and scientific analyses of the gold and amber finds from Bernstorfer Berg near Kranzberg, Upper Bavaria. Annual publication for Middle German prehistory (in German), 96 (2017)
22. H. Maryon, Metal Working in the Ancient World. Am. J. Archaeol. 53, 93–125 (1949)10.2307/500498 ↗