journal article·2022-08Open access

Effect of matrix solidification on the structure formation in electromagnetic suspensions

Konstantinos Manikas, Markus Hütter, Patrick D. Anderson

Applied Physics A· Volume 128· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract For suspensions with electromagnetic particles exposed to an external field, we examine the effect of the solidification of the suspending medium on the formation of particle structures, representative of the curing of a photo-reactive resin during stereolithography. To that end, Brownian Dynamics (BD) simulations are examined in which the solidification of the suspending medium can be incorporated by increasing its viscosity in the course of time. For illustrative purposes, it is assumed that the viscosity function is known apriori in explicit and parametrized form, however, experimental data can be used as well. It is demonstrated that one can study the effects of the viscosity increase by a transformation of time, akin to the time–temperature superposition principle, but here also in the presence of thermal noise on the suspended particles. Therefore, instead of performing BD simulations with a continuously increasing viscosity (computationally inefficient), we advocate performing simulations at a constant (low) viscosity and subsequently transform time (nonlinearly) for re-interpretation of the simulation results. So doing, one can predict the formation of particle structures during on-going solidification of the suspending medium. In practice, the viscosity increase is so drastic that further evolution of the particle structure can be considered as arrested after the characteristic transition-time of the viscosity is reached. Semi-quantitative rules of thumb are formulated for the 3D-printing practitioner. Graphical Abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Material Dynamics and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. X. Yan, P. Gu, Comput. Aided Des. 28(4), 307 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(95)00035-610.1016/0010-4485(95)00035-6 ↗
2. T.D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K.T. Nguyen, D. Hui, Compos. B Eng. 143, 172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
3. C.W. Visser, R. Pohl, C. Sun, G.W. Römer, B. Huis int Veld, D. Lohse, Adv. Mater. 27(27), 4087 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150105810.1002/adma.201501058 ↗
4. S.C. Ligon, R. Liska, J. Stampfl, M. Gurr, R. Mülhaupt, Chem. Rev. 117(15), 10212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
5. P.H. Warnke, H. Seitz, F. Warnke, S.T. Becker, S. Sivananthan, E. Sherry, Q. Liu, J. Wiltfang, T. Douglas, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 93B(1), 212 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3157710.1002/jbm.b.31577 ↗
6. P.J. Bártolo, Stereolithography: Materials, Processes and Applications (. Springer, US, Boston, MA, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92904-0_110.1007/978-0-387-92904-0_1 ↗
7. K. Salonitis, Comprehensive Materials Processing (Elsevier, Oxford, 2014), pp. 19–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01001-310.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01001-3 ↗
8. J. Czyzewski, P. Burzyński, K. Gaweł, J. Meisner, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 209(12–13), 5281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.015 ↗
9. K. Maute, A. Tkachuk, J. Wu, H.J. Qi, Z. Ding, M.L. Dunn, J. Mech. Design 137(11), 111402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403099410.1115/1.4030994 ↗
10. S. Raja, N. Court, J. Sidhu, C. Tuck, R. Hague, 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium - An Additive Manufacturing Conference. SFF 2010, 256–265 (2010)
11. G. Villar, A.D. Graham, H. Bayley, Science 340(6128), 48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122949510.1126/science.1229495 ↗
12. F. Massimiliano, P. de Crescenzio Francesca, Rapid Prototyp.J. 14(5), 318 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254081090799210.1108/13552540810907992 ↗
13. N. Oxman, E. Tsai, M. Firstenberg, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 7(4), 261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2012.73136910.1080/17452759.2012.731369 ↗
14. D. Han, C. Yang, N.X. Fang, H. Lee, Addit. Manuf. 27, 606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.03110.1016/j.addma.2019.03.031 ↗
15. C. Mendes-Felipe, J. Oliveira, I. Etxebarria, J.L. Vilas-Vilela, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Adv. Mater. Technol. 4(3), 1800618 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20180061810.1002/admt.201800618 ↗
16. F. Castles, D. Isakov, A. Lui, Q. Lei, C.E.J. Dancer, Y. Wang, J.M. Janurudin, S.C. Speller, C.R.M. Grovenor, P.S. Grant, Sci. Rep. UK 6, 22714 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2271410.1038/srep22714 ↗
17. D. Kokkinis, M. Schaffner, A.R. Studart, Nat. Commun. 6, 8643 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms964310.1038/ncomms9643 ↗
18. N. Lazarus, S.S. Bedair, G.L. Smith, Addit. Manuf. 26, 15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.01210.1016/j.addma.2018.12.012 ↗
19. H. Dodziuk, Pol. J. Thor. Cardiovasc. Surg. 13(3), 283 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2016.6262510.5114/kitp.2016.62625 ↗
20. O. Kurochkin, O. Buluy, J. Varshal, M. Manevich, A. Glushchenko, J.L. West, Y. Reznikov, V. Nazarenko, J. Appl. Phys. 124(21), 214501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.505739310.1063/1.5057393 ↗
21. L. Quanlu, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(2), 856 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.142134310.1121/1.1421343 ↗
22. J.E. Martin, A. Snezhko, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76(12), 126601 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/12/12660110.1088/0034-4885/76/12/126601 ↗
23. T.C. Halsey, Adv. Mater. 5(10), 711 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.1993005100410.1002/adma.19930051004 ↗
24. A. Sprecher, J. Carlson, H. Conrad, Mater. Sci. Eng. 95, 187 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(87)90510-610.1016/0025-5416(87)90510-6 ↗
25. M. Fermigier, A.P. Gast, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 154(2), 522 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(92)90165-I10.1016/0021-9797(92)90165-I ↗
26. D.K. Mohapatra, J.M. Laskar, J. Philip, J. Mol. Liq. 304, 112737 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11273710.1016/j.molliq.2020.112737 ↗
27. D.J. Klingenberg, F. van Swol, C.F. Zukoski, J. Chem. Phys. 91(12), 7888 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45725610.1063/1.457256 ↗
28. R. Anastasio, E. Maassen, R. Cardinaels, G. Peters, L. van Breemen, Polymer 150, 84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.01510.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.015 ↗
29. N. Darsono, H. Mizunuma, H. Obara, Appl. Rheol. 21(6), 63566 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3933/applrheol-21-6356610.3933/applrheol-21-63566 ↗
30. E.V. Morozov, M.M. Novikov, V.M. Bouznik, Addit. Manuf. 12, 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.01510.1016/j.addma.2016.05.015 ↗
31. G.H. Kim, Y.M. Shkel, R.E. Rowlands, in Proceedings of Smart Structures and Materials 2003, ed. by Y. Bar-Cohen (San Diego, California, United States, 2003), vol. 5051, pp. 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.48443210.1117/12.484432 ↗
32. G. Kim, Y.M. Shkel, J. Mater. Res. 19(04), 1164 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2004.015110.1557/JMR.2004.0151 ↗
33. J. Martin, R. Anderson, C.P. Tigges, J. Chem. Phys 108(9), 3765 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.47578110.1063/1.475781 ↗
34. J.E. Martin, E. Venturini, J. Odinek, R.A. Anderson, Phys. Rev. E 61, 2818 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.281810.1103/PhysRevE.61.2818 ↗
35. D.N. Theodorou, U.W. Suter, Macromolecules 18(6), 1206 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00148a02810.1021/ma00148a028 ↗
36. G. Voronoi, J. Reine Angew. Math. 1908(133), 97 (1908). https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1908.133.9710.1515/crll.1908.133.97 ↗
37. G.G. Vogiatzis, D.N. Theodorou, Macromolecules 47(1), 387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma402214r10.1021/ma402214r ↗
38. J.C.G. Montoro, J.L.F. Abascal, J. Phys. Chem. 97(16), 4211 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1021/j100118a04410.1021/j100118a044 ↗
39. M.L. Greenfield, D.N. Theodorou, Macromolecules 26(20), 5461 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00072a02610.1021/ma00072a026 ↗
40. F.W. Starr, S. Sastry, J.F. Douglas, S.C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 125501 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.12550110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.125501 ↗
41. P.F. Damasceno, M. Engel, S.C. Glotzer, Science 337(6093), 453 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122086910.1126/science.1220869 ↗
42. P. Varadan, M.J. Solomon, Langmuir 19(3), 509 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/la026303j10.1021/la026303j ↗
43. X. Li, X.S. Li, J. Eng. Mech. 135(7), 641 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:7(641)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:7(641) ↗
44. M. Hütter, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 231(2), 337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.715010.1006/jcis.2000.7150 ↗
45. M. Hütter, Phys. Rev. E 68(3), 031404 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.03140410.1103/PhysRevE.68.031404 ↗
46. M. Kerschnitzki, P. Kollmannsberger, M. Burghammer, G.N. Duda, R. Weinkamer, W. Wagermaier, P. Fratzl, J. Bone Miner. Res. 28(8), 1837 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.192710.1002/jbmr.1927 ↗
47. P. Kollmannsberger, M. Kerschnitzki, F. Repp, W. Wagermaier, R. Weinkamer, P. Fratzl, New J. Phys. 19(7), 073019 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa764b10.1088/1367-2630/aa764b ↗
48. K. Manikas, G.G. Vogiatzis, P.D. Anderson, M. Hütter, Appl. Phys. A Mater. 126, 494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03612-410.1007/s00339-020-03612-4 ↗
49. K. Manikas, G.G. Vogiatzis, M. Hütter, P.D. Anderson, Multiscale Multidiscip. Model. Exp. Des. 4, 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-021-00091-910.1007/s41939-021-00091-9 ↗
50. K. Manikas, M. Hütter, P.D. Anderson, Multiscale Multidiscip. Model. Exp. Des. 4, 227 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-021-00100-x10.1007/s41939-021-00100-x ↗
51. R. Li, Mat. Sci. Eng. A Struct. 278(1), 36 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00602-410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00602-4 ↗
52. R. Anastasio, UV-Cured Polymer Networks: From Processing to Properties (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2019)
53. H. Öttinger, Stochastic Processes in Polymeric Fluids: Tools and Examples for Developing Simulation Algorithms (Springer, New York, 1996)10.1007/978-3-642-58290-5 ↗
54. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007)
55. T.B. Jones, Electromechanics of Particles (Cambridge University Press, 1995). Cambridge Books Online10.1017/CBO9780511574498 ↗
56. C. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry, and the Natural Sciences. Springer Complexity (Springer, 2004)10.1007/978-3-662-05389-8 ↗
57. Y. Gao, M. Hulsen, T. Kang, J. den Toonder, Phys. Rev. E 86(4), 41503 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.04150310.1103/PhysRevE.86.041503 ↗
58. C. Böttcher, Theory of Electric Polarization, 2nd edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-41019-1.50007-910.1016/B978-0-444-41019-1.50007-9 ↗
59. K. Manikas, M. Hütter, P.D. Anderson. Dataset for Effect of matrix solidification on the structure formation in electromagnetic suspensions. (2022). Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.663053710.5281/zenodo.6630537 ↗