journal article·2022-04

Lithography of poly(methyl methacrylate) through the simultaneous excitation of inner- and outer-shell electrons

Sho Amano

Applied Physics A· Volume 128· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

We demonstrated soft X-ray lithography at a wavelength of 3.37 nm using a laser-plasma source and a multi-layer mirror, where the resist was poly(methyl methacrylate) and the developer was ethanol. A nickel mesh was used as a contact mask. The results of lithography showed that the poly(methyl methacrylate) could be etched highly efficiently using X-ray pulses with an intensity of 6.5 μJ/cm2, where the dose required for an etching depth of 0.1 μm was 5.3 mJ/cm2. Additionally, in a proof-of-principle study of the concept that more efficient X-ray lithography can be achieved through the simultaneous excitation of inner- and outer-shell electrons, lithography through double-beam irradiation was tested. The etching efficiency was increased by a factor of 2 using an ultraviolet lamp and a factor of 1.7 using a CO2 infrared laser, relative to the use of X-ray irradiation alone. It is expected that the adoption of the concept will be effective in X-ray micromachining.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Laser Design and Applications · Atomic and Molecular Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. V. Bakshi (ed.), EUV Lithography (SPIE, Washington, 2018)
2. V. Saile, U. Wallrabe, O. Tabata, J.G. Korvink (eds.), LIGA and its Applications (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2009)
3. S. Amano, in Recent Advance in Nanofabrication Techniques and Applications, ed. B. Cui (InTech, Croatia, 2011) Chap 18, p. 353.
4. S. Amano, in Advance in Engineering Research, ed. V.M. Petrova (Nova, New York, 2021) Vol. 40, Chap. 1, p. 1.
5. S. Amano, K. Masuda, A. Shimoura, S. Miyamoto, T. Mochizuki, Appl. Phys. B 101, 213 (2010)10.1007/s00340-010-3997-7 ↗
6. S. Amano, T. Inoue, Appl. Phys. B 108, 243 (2012)10.1007/s00340-012-5215-2 ↗
7. S. Amano, Appl. Phys. Express 9, 076201 (2016).10.7567/APEX.9.076201 ↗
8. S. Amano, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 126201 (2018).10.7567/JJAP.57.126201 ↗
9. S. Amano, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 063104 (2014).10.1063/1.4879975 ↗
10. S. Miyamoto, A. Shimoura, S. Amano, K. Fukugaki, H. Kinugasa, T. Inoue, T. Mochizuki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 261502 (2005).10.1063/1.1968415 ↗
11. L.E Ocola, M. Costales, D.J. Gosztola, Nanotechnol. 27, 035302 (2016).10.1088/0957-4484/27/3/035302 ↗
12. R. Hoogenboom, C.R. Becer, C.G. Samchez, S. Hoeppener, U.S. Schubert, Aust. J. Chem. 63, 1173 (2010)10.1071/CH10083 ↗
13. W. Glashauser, G.V. Ghica, Patent number 4,393,129 (Germany: Siemens Aktiengeselschaft) (1983).
14. D. He, H. Solak, W. Li, F. Cerrina, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 17, 3379 (1999)10.1116/1.591014 ↗
15. Y. Ekinch, H.H. Solak, C. Padeste, J. Gobrecht, M.P. Stykovich, P.F. Nealey, Microelectron. Eng. 84, 700 (2007)10.1016/j.mee.2007.01.213 ↗
16. https://henke.lbl.gov/optical_constants/.