journal article·2016-09

Magnetic field dependent polarizability and electric field dependent diamagnetic susceptibility of a donor in Si

M. Muthukrishnaveni, N. Srinivasan

Applied Physics A· Volume 122· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

The polarizability and diamagnetic susceptibility values of a shallow donor in Si are computed. These values are obtained for the cases $$\bar{E}\parallel \bar{B}$$ and $$\bar{E}\, \bot \,\bar{B}$$ . The anisotropy introduced by these perturbations are properly taken care of in the expressions derived for polarizability and magnetic susceptibility. Our results show that the numerical value of the contribution from electric field to diamagnetic susceptibility is several orders smaller than that of the magnetic field effect. Polarizability values are obtained in a magnetic field by two different methods. The polarizability values decrease as the intensity of magnetic field increases. Using the Clausius–Mossotti relation, the anisotropic values of the refractive indices for different magnetic fields are estimated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. W. Kohn, Solid State Phys. 5, 257 (1957)10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60104-6 ↗
2. A.K. Ramdas, S. Rodriguez, Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 1297 (1981)10.1088/0034-4885/44/12/002 ↗
3. R. Resta, Solid State Commun. 29, 277 (1979)
4. R.N. Bhatt, Phys. B 146B, 99 (1987)10.1016/0378-4363(87)90055-6 ↗
5. H. Kamimura, in Crystalline Semiconducting Materials and Devices, ed. by P.N. Butcher, N.H. March, M.P. Tosi (Plenum Press, New York, 1986), p. 217
6. T.G. Castner, N.K. Lee, G.S. Cieloszyk, G.L. Salinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1627 (1975)10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.1627 ↗
7. M. Capizzi, G.A. Thomas, F. De Rosca, R.N. Bhatt, T.M. Rice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1019 (1980)10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1019 ↗
8. A. Roy, M. Turner, M.P. Sarachik, Phys Rev. B 37, 5522 (1988)10.1103/PhysRevB.37.5522 ↗
9. M. Muthukrishnaveni, N. Srinivasan, Phase Transit. 85, 391 (2011)10.1080/01411594.2011.604836 ↗
10. N. Muthu Irulayee, K. Navaneethakrishnan, Phys. E 41, 193 (2009)10.1016/j.physe.2008.06.028 ↗
11. A. John Peter, K. Navaneethakrishnan, Phys. B 366, 146 (2005)10.1016/j.physb.2005.05.031 ↗
12. A. Therese Pushpam, K. Navaneethakrishnan, Solid State Commun. 144, 153 (2007)10.1016/j.ssc.2007.07.036 ↗
13. M. Rasolt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1482 (1987)10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1482 ↗
14. Hideo Hosono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 1 (2008)10.1143/JPSJS.77SC.1 ↗
15. M. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 84, 094504 (2011)10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094504 ↗
16. J. Krupski, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 8, 4171 (1975)10.1088/0022-3719/8/24/010 ↗
17. K. Navaneethakrishnan, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 16, L843 (1983)10.1088/0022-3719/16/23/005 ↗
18. A. Elangovan and K.Navaneethakrishnan, J. Phys. C; Solid State Physics 17 (1984) 82710.1088/0022-3719/17/5/012 ↗
19. L.I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edn. (Mc-Graw Hill, New York, 1968)
20. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 7th edn. (Wiley, Newyork, 1996), p. 285
21. T.F. Rosenbaum, G.A. Thomas, M.A. Paalanan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2121 (1994)10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2121 ↗
22. T.G. Castner, D.L. Dexter, S.D. Druger, Phys. Rev. A 24, 2897 (1981)10.1103/PhysRevA.24.2897 ↗
23. S. Sahoo, Y.C. Lin, Y.K. Ho, Phys. E 40, 3107 (2008)10.1016/j.physe.2008.04.017 ↗
24. A. Zounoubi, I. Zorkani, K. El Messaoudi, A. Jorio, Phys. Lett. A 312, 220 (2003)10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00640-6 ↗
25. A. John Peter, K. Navaneethakrishnan, Phys. E 15, 153 (2002)10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00457-5 ↗