Study of optical absorption differences of doped polyaniline films by photothermal spectroscopies
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we studied the optical absorption spectral differences between doped and slightly doped polyaniline films and a derivative by photopyroelectric and photoacoustic spectroscopies. There exist great spectral differences between doped and slightly doped samples as shown by conventional optical absorption spectroscopy, but not greatly evidenced by photopyroelectric spectroscopy. The latter was applied to obtain thermal parameters such as thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity, and as a result it showed that these thermal properties of polyaniline films are very similar for doped and slightly doped samples. Also it showed that for thicker films (about 20 μm), there are no significant optical absorption differences between them. However, for thin films both techniques showed greater optical absorption differences for doped and slightly doped samples, mainly detected by photoacoustic spectroscopy. These behaviors are in accordance with published results which is the granular metal model for polyaniline. This model explains the polyaniline polymeric matrix as formed by conductive islands in the insulating bulk material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. E.M. Genies, M. Lapkowski, C. Tsintavis, New J. Chem. 12, 181 (1988)
2. M. Angelopoulos, Synth. Met. 41–43, 1109 (1991)10.1016/0379-6779(91)91563-P ↗
3. Y. Cao, G.M. Treacy, P. Smith, A.J. Heeger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2711 (1992)10.1063/1.106852 ↗
4. M. Leclerc, J. Guay, L.H. Dao, Macromolecules 22, 649 (1989)10.1021/ma00192a024 ↗
5. J.E. de Albuquerque, L.H.C. Mattoso, D.T. Balogh, R.M. Faria, J.G. Masters, A.G. MacDiarmid, Synth. Met. 113, 19 (2000)10.1016/S0379-6779(99)00299-4 ↗
6. J.E. de Albuquerque, L.H.C. Mattoso, R.M. Faria, J.G. Masters, A.G. MacDiarmid, Synth. Met. 146, 1 (2004)10.1016/j.synthmet.2004.05.019 ↗
7. J.E. de Albuquerque, W.L.B. Melo, R.M. Faria, J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 38, 1294 (2000)10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000515)38:10<1294::AID-POLB40>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
8. J.E. de Albuquerque, W.L.B. Melo, R.M. Faria, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 374, 379 (2002)10.1080/10587250210453 ↗
9. J.E. de Albuquerque, W.L.B. Melo, R.M. Faria, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 306 (2003)10.1063/1.1515901 ↗
10. A. Mandelis, M.M. Zver, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 4421 (1985)10.1063/1.334565 ↗
11. A. Rosencwaig, Photoacoustics and Photoacoustic Spectroscopy (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980)
12. W.L.B. Melo, A. Pawlicka, R. Sanches, S. Mascarenhas, R.M. Faria, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 979 (1993)10.1063/1.354840 ↗
13. J.E. de Albuquerque, D.T. Balogh, R.M. Faria, J. Phys. IV 125, 63 (2005)
14. J.E. de Albuquerque, P.M.S. de Oliveira, S.O. Ferreira, J. Phys. IV 125, 169 (2005)
15. J.E. de Albuquerque, C. Giacomantonio, A.G. White, P. Meredith, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 061920 (2005)10.1063/1.2009833 ↗
16. J.E. de Albuquerque, C. Giacomantonio, A.G. White, P. Meredith, Eur. Biophys. J. 35, 190 (2006)10.1007/s00249-005-0020-z ↗
17. J.E. de Albuquerque, D.T. Balogh, R.M. Faria, Appl. Phys. A 86, 395 (2007)10.1007/s00339-006-3789-4 ↗
18. J.E. de Albuquerque, E. Tavenner, M. Curry, R.E. Giedd, P. Meredith, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 054506 (2007)10.1063/1.2436465 ↗
19. A. Mandelis, F. Boroumand, H. Solka, J. Highfield, H. Van Den Bergh, Appl. Spectrosc. 44, 132 (1990)10.1366/0003702904085778 ↗
20. J.E. de Albuquerque, P.M.S. de Oliveira, S.O. Ferreira, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 103527 (2007)10.1063/1.2734940 ↗
21. L.H.C. Mattoso, R.M. Faria, L.O.S. Bulhões, A.G. MacDiarmid, J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 32, 2147 (1994)10.1002/pola.1994.080321117 ↗
22. L.S. Stafström, J.L. Brédas, A.J. Epstein, H.S. Woo, D.B. Tanner, W.S. Huang, A.G. MacDiarmid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1464 (1987)10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1464 ↗
23. C.B. Duke, E.M. Conwell, A. Paton, Chem. Phys. Lett. 131, 82 (1986)10.1016/0009-2614(86)80521-8 ↗
24. Z.H. Wang, C. Li, E.M. Scherr, A.G. MacDiarmid, A.J. Epstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1745 (1991)10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1745 ↗
25. F.C. Lavarda, M.C. dos Santos, D.S. Galvão, B. Laks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1267 (1994)10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1267 ↗
26. D. Jeon, J. Kim, M.C. Gallagher, R.F. Willis, Science 256, 1662 (1992)10.1126/science.256.5064.1662 ↗
27. R.F. Bianchi, C.M. Lepienski, G.F. Leal Ferreira, R.M. Faria, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4602 (1999)10.1063/1.478341 ↗
28. T. Toyoda, H. Nakamura, Synth. Met. 69, 227 (1995)10.1016/0379-6779(94)02427-Z ↗
29. T. Toyoda, H. Nakamura, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1 34, 2907 (1995)10.1143/JJAP.34.2907 ↗