Detection of nano scale thin films with polarized neutron reflectometry at the presence of smooth and rough interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
By knowing the phase and modules of the reflection coefficient in neutron reflectometry problems, a unique result for the scattering length density (SLD) of a thin film can be determined which will lead to the exact determination of type and thickness of the film. In the past decade, several methods have been worked out to resolve the phase problem such as dwell time method, reference layer method and variation of surroundings, among which the reference method and variation of surroundings by using a magnetic substrate and polarized neutrons is of the most applicability. All of these methods are based on the solution of Schrodinger equation for a discontinuous and step-like potential at each interface. As in real sample there are some smearing and roughness at boundaries, consideration of smoothness and roughness of interfaces would affect the final output result. In this paper, we have investigated the effects of smoothness of interfaces on determination of the phase of reflection as well as the retrieval process of the SLD, by using a smooth varying function (Eckart potential). The effects of roughness of interfaces on the same parameters, have also been investigated by random variation of the interface around it mean position.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Physics and Applications · Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. X.-L. Zhou, S.-H. Chem, Theoretical foundation of X-ray and neutron reflectometry. Phys. Rep. 257, 223–348 (1995)10.1016/0370-1573(94)00110-O ↗
2. C.F. Majkrzak, N.F. Berk, U.A. Perez-Salas, Phase sensitive neutron reflectometry. Langmuir 19, 7796–7810 (2003)10.1021/la0341254 ↗
3. J. Kasper, H. Leeb, R. Lipperheide, Phase determination in spin-polarized neutron specular reflection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2614 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2614 ↗
4. C.F. Majkrzak, N.F. Berk, Exact determination of the neutron reflection amplitude and phase. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 221(1–4), 520–523 (1996)10.1016/0921-4526(95)00974-4 ↗
5. C.F. Majkrzak, N.F. Berk, Phase sensitive reflectometry and the unambiguous determination of scattering length density profiles. Physica B 336, 27–38 (2003)10.1016/S0921-4526(03)00266-7 ↗
6. C.F. Majkrzak, N.F. Berk, Exact determination of the phase in neutron reflectometry by variation of the surrounding media. Phys. Rev. B 58(23) (1998)10.1103/PhysRevB.58.15416 ↗
7. J. Kasper, H. Leeb, R. Lipperheide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2614 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2614 ↗
8. H. Leeb, J. Kasper, R. Lipperheide, Phys. Lett. A 239, 147 (1998)10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00972-9 ↗
9. S. Farhad Masoudi, A. Pazirandeh, Phase determination in spin-polarized neutron specular reflectometry by using a magnetic substrate. Physica B 362, 153–157 (2005)10.1016/j.physb.2005.02.005 ↗
10. S.F. Masoudi, M. Vaezzadeh, M. Golafrouz, G.R. Jafari, Retrieval of the complex reflection coefficient from nano scale thin films by using polarized neutrons and magnetic substrates. Appl. Phys. A 86, 95–100 (2007)10.1007/s00339-006-3735-5 ↗
11. S.F. Masoudi, Exact determination of phase information in spin-polarized neutron specular reflectometry. Eur. Phys. J. B 46, 33–39 (2005)10.1140/epjb/e2005-00236-x ↗
12. C.F. Majkrzak, N.F. Berk, J. Dura, S. Atija, A. Karim, J. Pedulla, R.D. Deslattes, Physica B 248, 338 (1998)10.1016/S0921-4526(98)00260-9 ↗
13. D.A. Korneev, V.K. Ignatovich, S.P. Yaradaykin, V.I. Bodnarchuk, Specular reflection of neutrons from potentials with smooth boundaries. Physica B 364, 99–110 (2005)10.1016/j.physb.2005.03.041 ↗
14. M.V. Klibanov, P.E. Sacks, J. Comput. Phys. 112, 273 (1994)10.1006/jcph.1994.1099 ↗
15. K. Chadan, P.C. Sabatier, Inverse Problem in Quantum Scattering Theory, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 1989)10.1007/978-3-642-83317-5 ↗
16. T. Aktosun, P. Sacks, Inverse Probl. 14, 211 (1998)10.1088/0266-5611/14/2/001 ↗
17. T. Aktosun, P. Sacks, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Appl. Math. 60, 1340 (2000)10.1137/S0036139999355588 ↗
18. T. Aktosun, P. Sacks, Inverse Probl. 16, 821 (2000)10.1088/0266-5611/16/3/317 ↗
19. S.S. Jahromi, S.F. Masoudi, Polarized neutron reflectometry at the presence of smooth interfacial potential. ICNX 2009 conference, 29 June–1 July, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia10.1063/1.3295616 ↗
20. S.S. Jahromi, S.F. Masoudi, Effects of potential smoothness on probing nano-scale thin films using neutron reflectometry. Int. J. Nanotechnol. (2009, submitted)
21. G.E.P. Box, M.E. Muller, A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29(2), 610–611 (1958)10.1214/aoms/1177706645 ↗