Dependence of the resultant Seebeck coefficient on the thickness of Bi0.88Sb0.12 alloy in welded M/Bi–Sb/M (M = Cu and Ni) composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The local Seebeck coefficient αL and the resultant Seebeck coefficient αR of M/Bi0.88Sb0.12/M (M = Cu and Ni) composites with different thicknesses tBi–Sb of Bi–Sb alloy were measured as functions of z and T, where T is the absolute temperature, z is the distance from a center of Bi–Sb alloy to the middle point of two probes and αL and αR were measured using two probes separated by s=1.0 mm and s=tBi−Sb+0.1 mm, respectively. As a result, αL was enhanced extremely at the position of 0.2–0.3 mm away from the interfaces, while the local temperature along a composite varies linearly with changes in z within Bi–Sb alloy. The local maximum of αR at 344 K appeared at tBi−Sb≈0.9 mm, so that it is expected to increase up to −167 μV/K at tBi−Sb=0.87 mm from the expression fitted well to the experimental data, which is 2.1 times as large as the intrinsic α at 344 K of Bi–Sb alloy. Such a local enhancement in αL would probably be caused by a temperature gradient across the depletion layer formed at the interface. The thermoelectric figure of merit ZT of a composite with an optimum tBi−Sb of 0.87 mm is expected to reach the large value of 0.98 at 344 K, which corresponds to 4.5 times as high a value as ZT=0.22 at 344 K of Bi–Sb alloy. It is thus considered that the increase in αL at the interface is available as a useful mean of further increase in ZT of thermoelectric devices.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Wood, Prog. Phys. 51, 459 (1988)10.1088/0034-4885/51/4/001 ↗
2. G. Mahan, B. Sales, J. Sharp, Phys. Today 50, 42 (1997)10.1063/1.881752 ↗
3. H.J. Goldsmid, Thermoelectric Refrigeration (Plenum, New York, 1964)10.1007/978-1-4899-5723-8 ↗
4. L.D. Hicks, T.C. Harman, M.S. Dresselhaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3230 (1993)10.1063/1.110207 ↗
5. L.D. Hicks, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16631 (1993)10.1103/PhysRevB.47.16631 ↗
6. D.A. Broido, T.L. Reinnecke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1170 (1995)10.1063/1.114998 ↗
7. T. Koga, O. Rabin, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16703 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevB.62.16703 ↗
8. R. Venkatasubramanian, E. Siivola, T. Colpitts, B. O’Quinn, Nature 413, 597 (2001)10.1038/35098012 ↗
9. K. F Hsu, S. Loo, F. Guo, W. Chen, J.S. Dyck, C. Uher, T. Hogan, E.K. Polychroniadis, M.G. Kanatzidis, Science 303, 818 (2004)10.1126/science.1092963 ↗
10. D.J. Bergman, O. Levy, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 6821 (1991)10.1063/1.349830 ↗
11. O. Yamashita, K. Satou, H. Odahara, S. Tomiyoshi, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 073707 (2005)10.1063/1.2081113 ↗
12. O. Yamashita, H. Odahara, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 123721 (2006)10.1063/1.2207718 ↗
13. W.M. Yim, A. Amith, Solid State Electron. 15, 1141 (1972)10.1016/0038-1101(72)90173-6 ↗
14. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1996)
15. H.B. Michaelson, IBM J. Res. Dev. 22, 72 (1978)10.1147/rd.221.0072 ↗
16. A.J. Dekker, Solid State Physics (Prentice-Hall, New York, 1957)
17. K. Kim, J. Park, S.U. Kim, O. Kwon, J.S. Lee, S.H. Park, Y.K. Choi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 043107 (2006)10.1063/1.2432949 ↗
18. H.K. Lyeo, A.A. Khajetoorians, L. Shi, K.P. Pipe, R.J. Ram, A. Shakouri, C.K. Shih, Science 303, 816 (2004)10.1126/science.1091600 ↗
19. J. Tauc, Czechosl. J. Phys. 3, 282 (1953)10.1007/BF01687318 ↗