journal article·2011-03

Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of $\mathrm{Al}3\mathrm{O}3-$ : photoisomerization versus photofragmentation

Kiichirou Koyasu, Christian Braun, Sebastian Proch, Gerd Ganteför

Applied Physics A· Volume 102· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In general, clusters are unstable and in many cases several metastable isomers exist even at low temperature. Therefore, a cluster may react with a dramatic geometry change to a small disturbance such as a weak field or to the absorption of a low-energy photon. Here, we study the response of \(\mathrm{Al}3\mathrm{O}3-\) to photoexcitation using time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Earlier experimental and theoretical studies suggested that this cluster anion undergoes a geometry change after photoexcitation. In contrast, our time-resolved spectra indicate that photoexcitation triggers ultra-fast fragmentation. This example demonstrates that ultra-fast processes in clusters are not well understood and that it is still difficult to gain reliable experimental data about such processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry · Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. G. v. Helden, Ming-Teh Hsu, R.R. Kemper, M.T. Bowers, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 3835 (1991)10.1063/1.460783 ↗
2. K.-M. Ho, A.A. Shvartsburg, B. Pan, Z.-Y. Lu, C.-Z. Wang, J.G. Wacker, J.L. Fye, M.F. Jarrold, Nature 392, 582 (1998)10.1038/33369 ↗
3. Y.-H. Cui, D.-L. Chen, Q.T. Wei, J.-K. Feng, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 7933 (2007)10.1021/jp072768c ↗
4. B. Yoon, U. Landman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 056102 (2008)
5. R.J. Sension, S.T. Repinec, A.Z. Szarka, R.M. Hochstrasser, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6291 (1993)10.1063/1.464824 ↗
6. T. Baumert, T. Frohnmeyer, B. Kiefer, P. Niklaus, M. Strehle, G. Gerber, A.H. Zewail, Appl. Phys. B 72, 105 (2001)10.1007/s003400000497 ↗
7. A.V. Davis, R. Wester, A.E. Bragg, D.M. Neumark, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 999 (2003)10.1063/1.1536617 ↗
8. G. Lüttgens, N. Pontius, P.S. Bechthold, M. Neeb, W. Eberhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076102 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.076102 ↗
9. G. Ganteför, S. Kraus, W. Eberhardt, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 88–91, 35 (1997)
10. H. Wu, Xi Li, X.-B. Wang, C.-F. Ding, L.-S. Wang, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 449 (1998)10.1063/1.476583 ↗
11. G. Meloni, M.J. Ferguson, D.M. Neumark, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 4073 (2003)10.1039/B308119B ↗
12. F. Ahu Akin, C.C. Jarrold, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 5841 (2003)10.1063/1.1553466 ↗
13. X.-Y. Cui, I. Morrison, J.-G. Han, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 1077 (2002)10.1063/1.1484387 ↗
14. P. Gerhardt, M. Niemietz, Young Dok Kim, G. Ganteför, Chem. Phys. Lett. 382, 454 (2003)10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.098 ↗
15. M. Niemietz, M. Engelke, Y.D. Kim, G. Ganteför, Phys. Rev. B 75, 085438 (2007)10.1103/PhysRevB.75.085438 ↗
16. K. Koyasu, Ch. Braun, S. Proch, G. Ganteför, Appl. Phys. A 100, 431 (2010)10.1007/s00339-010-5855-1 ↗
17. K. Koyasu, M. Niemietz, W. Westhäuser, G. Ganteför, Eur. Phys. J. D 53, 59 (2009)10.1140/epjd/e2009-00059-y ↗