journal article·2013-09

Temperature-dependent hyperfine interactions at 111Cd-C complex in germanium

Genene Tessema Mola

Applied Physics A· Volume 112· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The temperature dependent nuclear hyperfine interaction of 111Cd-carbon complex in germanium has been studied using the perturbed γ–γ angular correlation (PAC) method. The parameters of the hyperfine interaction representing substitutional carbon–cadmium complex in germanium (νQ1=207(1) MHz (η=0.16)) shows dependence on temperature. The formation and thermal stability of the complex has been reported by the same author earlier. It was found in this study that the quadrupole coupling constant of the interaction increases at sample temperature below 293 K. The results are encouraging toward better understanding of the complex in the host matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. L. Hoffmann, J.C. Bach, B. Bech Nielsen, Phys. Rev. B 55(17), 11167 (1997)10.1103/PhysRevB.55.11167 ↗
2. J.T. Herrold, V.L. Dalal, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 270, 255 (2000)10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00091-0 ↗
3. U. Ott, H. Wolf, Th. Krings, Th. Wichert, H. Hässlein, R. Sielemann, M. Deicher, R.C. Newman, W. Zulehner, Mater. Sci. Forum 143–147, 1251 (1994)10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.143-147.1251 ↗
4. H. Wolf, Acta Phys. Pol. A 109, 433 (2006)10.12693/APhysPolA.109.433 ↗
5. G. Tessema, R. Vianden, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 5297 (2003)10.1088/0953-8984/15/30/311 ↗
6. D. Jürgen, M. Urmacher, H.-G. Gehrke, M. Nagl, U. Vatter, C. Brüsewitz, H. Hofsäss, J. Mestnik-Filho, M.W. Barsoum, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 505501 (2011)
7. A.F. Pasquevich, R. Vianden, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10858 (1988)10.1103/PhysRevB.37.10858 ↗
8. W. Sato, Y. Istuki, S. Morimoto, H. Susuki, S. Nasu, A. Shinohara, Y. Ohkubo, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045319 (2008)
9. M. Deicher, Hyperfine Interact. 79, 681 (1993)10.1007/BF00567596 ↗
10. G. Tessema, R. Vianden, Appl. Phys. A, Mater. Sci. Process. 15, 1471 (2005)10.1007/s00339-005-3249-6 ↗
11. G. Schatz, A. Weidinger, Nuclear Condensed Matter Physics (Wiley, New York, 1996)
12. N.P. Barradas, M. Rots, A.A. Melo, J.C. Soares, Phys. Rev. B 47, 8763 (1993)10.1103/PhysRevB.47.8763 ↗
13. R. Dogra, A.P. Byrne, M.C. Ridgway, J. Electron. Mater. 38(5), 623 (2009)10.1007/s11664-009-0658-x ↗
14. G. Tessema, M. Bekele, R. Vianden, J. Electron. Mater. 21, 1144 (2010)10.1007/s10854-009-0034-x ↗
15. A. Settels, T. Korhonen, N. Papanikolaus, R. Zeller, P.H. Dederichs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4369 (1999)10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4369 ↗
16. G. Marx, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bonn, 1995