Low pressure plasma etching of silicon carbide
Source abstract
Abstract
A low pressure etching of silicon carbide is qualitatively characterized by using a neural network. To construct a predictive model, the etch process was characterized by means of a 25 full factorial experiment. Experimental factors that were varied include radio frequency (rf) source power, bias power, pressure, O2 fraction, and gap between the plasma source and wafer. An additional 15 experiments were conducted to test the appropriateness of the trained model. An optimized etch rate model has a root mean-squared error of 12.78 nm/min. Model response surface behaviors were certified by actual measurements. Several noticeable features at lower pressure etching include a lower etch rate, inverse relationship between the source power level and the dc bias, and a smaller etch rate variation with the source power. The effect of the bias power on the etch rate or dc bias was affected little by the pressure level. Etch mechanisms for the gap variations were quite different depending on the bias powers. Several etching aspects useful for plasma control were revealed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. P.H. Yih, A.J. Steckl: J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 312 (1995)10.1149/1.2043918 ↗
2. R. Wolf, R. Helbig: J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 1037 (1996)10.1149/1.1836578 ↗
3. M. Kothandaraman, D. Alok, B.J. Baliga: J. Elect. Mat. 25, 875 (1996)10.1007/BF02666652 ↗
4. J.J. Wang, E.S. Lambers, S.J. Pearton, M. Ostling, C.M. Zetterling, J.M. Grow, F. Ren, R.J. Shul: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 2204 (1998)10.1116/1.581328 ↗
5. F.A. Khan, I. Adesida: Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2268 (1999)10.1063/1.124986 ↗
6. L. Cao, B. Li, J.H. Zhao: J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 3609 (1998)10.1149/1.1838850 ↗
7. B. Kim, K. Kwon, S. Kwon, J. Park, S.W. Yoo, K.S. Park, B.W. Kim: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 20, 2113 (2002)10.1116/1.1511212 ↗
8. B. Kim, S. Kong, B.T. Lee: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20, 146 (2002)10.1116/1.1427882 ↗
9. C.D. Himmel, G.S. May: IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact. 6, 103 (1993)10.1109/66.216928 ↗
10. B. Kim, K.H. Kwon: J. Appl. Phys. 93, 76 (2003)10.1063/1.1527216 ↗
11. D.C. Mongomery: Design and Analysis of Experiments (John Wiley & Sons, 1991)
12. D.E. Rumelhart, J.L. MacClelland: Parallel Distributed Processing, (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA 1986)10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 ↗
13. B. Kim, S. Park: Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 56, 39 (2001)10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00107-1 ↗
14. P. Ho, J.E. Johannes, R.J. Buss, E. Meeks: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19, 2344 (2001)10.1116/1.1387048 ↗
15. B. Kim, H.J. Choi, B.T. Lee: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20, 424 (2002)10.1116/1.1448509 ↗
16. B. Kim, B.T. Lee: IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 30, 2074 (2002)10.1109/TPS.2002.807497 ↗
17. S. Samukawa: Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 316 (1996)10.1063/1.116071 ↗
18. B. Kim, S. Kim, S. Ahn, B.T. Lee: Thin Solid Films 434, 276 (2003)10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00459-0 ↗