Moving Toward Nano-TCAD Through Multimillion-Atom Quantum-Dot Simulations Matching Experimental Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-loss optical communication requires light sources at 1.5 mum wavelengths. Experiments showed, without much theoretical guidance, that InAs/GaAs quantum dots (QDs) may be tuned to such wavelengths by adjusting the In fraction in an In x Ga 1- x As strain-reducing capping layer. In this paper, systematic multimillion-atom electronic structure calculations explain, qualitatively and quantitatively, for the first time, available experimental data. The nanoelectronic modeling NEMO 3-D simulations treat strain in a 15-million-atom system and electronic structure in a subset of ~ 9 million atoms using the experimentally given nominal geometries, and without any further parameter adjustments, the simulations match the nonlinear behavior of experimental data very closely. With the match to experimental data and the availability of internal model quantities, significant insight can be gained through mapping to reduced-order models and their relative importance. We can also demonstrate that starting from simple models has, in the past, led to the wrong conclusions. The critical new insight presented here is that the QD changes its shape. The quantitative simulation agreement with experiment, without any material or geometry parameter adjustment in a general atomistic tool, leads us to believe that the era of nanotechnology computer-aided design is approaching. NEMO 3-D will be released on nanoHUB.org, where the community can duplicate and expand on the results presented here through interactive simulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. valley-splitting in strained silicon quantum wells modeled with 2 degree miscuts, step disorder, and alloy disorder10.1063/1.2591432 ↗
2. high precision quantum control of single donor spins in si10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.036403 ↗
3. development of a nanoelectronic 3-d (nemo 3-d) simulator for multimillion atom simulations and its application to alloyed quantum dots
4. 0
5. 10.1017/CBO978051180574510.1017/CBO9780511805745 ↗
6. 0
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.23530710.1103/PhysRevB.66.235307 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.36415110.1063/1.364151 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.163771810.1063/1.1637718 ↗
10. 10.1006/spmi.2000.097310.1006/spmi.2000.0973 ↗
11. 10.1116/1.58939010.1116/1.589390 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R218510.1103/PhysRevB.60.R2185 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.04531810.1103/PhysRevB.71.045318 ↗
14. 10.1142/493410.1142/4934 ↗
15. michler · Single Quantum Dots Fundamentals Applications and New Concepts · 2003
16. 10.1063/1.213788010.1063/1.2137880 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.24533110.1103/PhysRevB.74.245331 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.20532410.1103/PhysRevB.76.205324 ↗
19. 10.1109/NEMS.2007.35217210.1109/NEMS.2007.352172 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.187110.1103/PhysRevB.39.1871 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.36849010.1063/1.368490 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1296310.1103/PhysRevB.62.12963 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.12345910.1063/1.123459 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.12192010.1063/1.121920 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.20532310.1103/PhysRevB.74.205323 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.01510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.015 ↗
27. growth and properties of inas/ingaas/gaas quantum dot structures
28. 10.1109/TED.2007.90287910.1109/TED.2007.902879 ↗
29. 10.1109/TED.2007.90487710.1109/TED.2007.904877 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.12520710.1103/PhysRevB.66.125207 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRev.145.63710.1103/PhysRev.145.637 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.152616710.1063/1.1526167 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.08530510.1103/PhysRevB.64.085305 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.11538610.1063/1.115386 ↗
35. bruchez · Quantum Dots Applications in Biology · 2007
36. 10.1063/1.137584210.1063/1.1375842 ↗
37. 10.1143/JJAP.35.127310.1143/JJAP.35.1273 ↗
38. 10.1002/pssc.20067153510.1002/pssc.200671535 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.12402310.1063/1.124023 ↗
40. 0
41. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.15710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.157 ↗
42. 10.1038/nphys99410.1038/nphys994 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.141210.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1412 ↗
44. 10.1109/IEDM.2008.479679410.1109/IEDM.2008.4796794 ↗
45. 10.1023/B:JCEL.0000011421.53762.9710.1023/B:JCEL.0000011421.53762.97 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.24531410.1103/PhysRevB.63.245314 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.12520710.1103/PhysRevB.66.125207 ↗
48. 10.1107/S090904959801555610.1107/S0909049598015556 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.502610.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5026 ↗