journal article·2007-04-23

Local Seebeck coefficient near the boundary in touching Cu/Bi-Te/Cu composites

O. Yamashita, H. Odahara

Applied Physics A· Volume 87· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The thermo-emf ΔV and temperature difference ΔT across the boundary were measured as a function of r for the touching p- and n-type Cu/Bi-Te/Cu composites composed of a combination of tBi-Te=2.0 mm and tCu=0.3 mm, where ΔT is produced by imposing a constant voltage of 1.7 V on two Peltier modules connected in series and r is the distance from the boundary that corresponds to the interval s between two thermocouples. The resultant Seebeck coefficient α across the boundary was obtained from the relation α=ΔV/ΔT. As a result, the resultant α of the touching p- and n-type composites have surprisingly great local maximum values of 1330 and -1140 μV/K at r≈0.03 mm, respectively, and decreased rapidly with an increase of r to approach the Seebeck coefficients of the intrinsic Bi-Te compounds. The resultant maximum α of the touching p- and n-type Cu/Bi-Te/Cu composites are approximately 5.4 and 5.5 times higher in absolute value than those of the intrinsic Bi-Te compounds, respectively. It was thus clarified for the first time that the local Seebeck coefficient is enhanced most strongly in the Bi-Te region where there is an approximately 30-μm distance from the boundary, not at the boundary between Bi-Te compounds and copper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Thermal properties of materials · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. H.J. Goldsmid, Thermoelectric Refrigeration (Plenum, New York, 1964)10.1007/978-1-4899-5723-8 ↗
2. M. Bartowiak, G.D. Mahan, Recent Trends in Thermoelectric Materials Research II: Semiconductors and Semimetals, ed. by T.M. Tritt (Academic, New York, 2001), vol. 70, p. 24510.1016/S0080-8784(01)80142-3 ↗
3. L.D. Hicks, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12727 (1993)10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727 ↗
4. L.D. Hicks, T.C. Harman, M.S. Dresselhaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3230 (1993)10.1063/1.110207 ↗
5. T. Koga, O. Rabin, M.S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16703 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevB.62.16703 ↗
6. R. Venkatasubramanian, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3091 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3091 ↗
7. R. Venkatasubramanian, E. Siivola, T. Colpitts, B. O’Quinn, Nature 413, 597 (2001)10.1038/35098012 ↗
8. O. Yamashita, H. Odahara, J. Mater. Sci. 41, 2795 (2006)10.1007/s10853-006-6133-7 ↗
9. J. Tauc, Czech. J. Phys. 3, 282 (1953)10.1007/BF01687318 ↗
10. I.I. Balmush, Z.M. Dashevsky, A.I. Kasiyan, Semiconductors 29, 937 (1995)
11. O. Yamashita, H. Odahara, K. Satou, J. Mater. Sci. 40, 1071 (2005)10.1007/s10853-005-6919-z ↗
12. O. Yamashita, K. Satou, H. Odahara, S. Tomiyoshi, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 073707 (2005)10.1063/1.2081113 ↗
13. H. Odahara, O. Yamashita, K. Satou, S. Tomiyoshi, J. Tani, H. Kido, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 103722 (2005)10.1063/1.1895468 ↗
14. O. Yamashita, H. Odahara, J. Mater. Sci. 41, 7437 (2006)10.1007/s10853-006-0810-4 ↗
15. O. Yamashita, S. Tomiyoshi, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6277 (2004)10.1063/1.1712013 ↗
16. O. Yamashita, S. Tomiyoshi, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 161 (2004)10.1063/1.1630363 ↗
17. W.M. Yim, F.D. Rosi, Solid State Electron. 15, 1121 (1972)10.1016/0038-1101(72)90172-4 ↗
18. T.C. Harman, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1373 (1958)10.1063/1.1723445 ↗
19. O. Yamashita, S. Tomiyoshi, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 492 (2003)10.1143/JJAP.42.492 ↗
20. O. Yamashita, H. Odahara, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 123721 (2006)10.1063/1.2207718 ↗
21. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, New York, 1996)
22. G.D. Mahan, M. Bartkowiak, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 953 (1999)10.1063/1.123420 ↗