Hydrogen-enhanced recrystallization in N+-implanted GaAs
Source abstract
Abstract
The hydrogen-enhanced recrystallization during thermal annealing in N+-implanted GaAs has been studied by combinatorial implantation process. Raman spectroscopy was used to study the crystallization properties of a set of hydrogenated cells on the N+-implanted GaAs wafer. A whole competitive process between H+ implantation-induced damage and recovery in the regrowth process of amorphous GaAs was observed within the proton dose region of 1.6×1015 to 1.1×1017 cm-2. In H+ dose region of 2.1×1016 to 5.4×1016 cm-2, H-enhanced recovery of crystal dominates the regrowth process. The crystal quality is better than that of unhydrogenated cell of N+-implanted GaAs in the H+ dose range from 4.7×1016 to 8.1×1016 cm-2. It is suggested that the vacancy supersaturation produced during hydrogen irradiation is dominantly responsible for the enhancement of thermal regrowth in the N+-implanted GaAs. Both the crystallization and amorphization process are clearly observed in different proton implantation dose regions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Miao, I.M. Tiginyanu, H.L. Hartnagel, G. Irmer, J. Monecke, B.L. Weiss: Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 847 (1997)10.1063/1.118222 ↗
2. W. Shan, K.M. Yu, W. Walukiewicz, J.W. Ager III, E.E. Haller, M.C. Ridfway: Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1410 (1999)10.1063/1.124951 ↗
3. J.S. Williams, M.W. Austin: Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 994 (1980)10.1063/1.91656 ↗
4. Soma Dey, Shikha Varma: J. Appl. Phys. 90, 2618 (2001)10.1063/1.1389485 ↗
5. S.T. Johnson, J.S. Williams, E. Nygren, R.G. Elliman: J. Appl. Phys. 64, 6567 (1988)10.1063/1.342029 ↗
6. M.C. Ridgway, S.T. Johnson, R.G. Elliman, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 59/60, 454 (1991)10.1016/0168-583X(91)95258-F ↗
7. S.T. Johnson, R.G. Elliman, J.S. Williams: Nucl. Instru. Meth. B 39, 449 (1989)10.1016/0168-583X(89)90823-9 ↗
8. A. Kinomura, J.S. Williams, K. Fujii: Phys. Rev. B 59, 15214 (1999)10.1103/PhysRevB.59.15214 ↗
9. K. Saarinen, P. Hautojarvi, J. Keinonen, E. Rauhala, J. Raisanen, C. Corbel: Phys. Rev. B 43, 4249 (1991)10.1103/PhysRevB.43.4249 ↗
10. J. Wang, Y. Yoo, C. Gao, I. Takeuchi, X. Sun, H. Chang, X.-D. Xiang, P. G. Schultz: Science 279, 1712 (1998)10.1126/science.279.5357.1712 ↗
11. I.D. Desnica-Frankovic: J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7587 (1999)10.1063/1.370559 ↗
12. U.V. Desnica, I.D. Desnica-Frankovic, M. Ivanda, K. Furic, T.E. Haynes: Phys. Rev. B 55, 16205 (1997)10.1103/PhysRevB.55.16205 ↗
13. K.K. Tiong, P.M. Amirtharaj, F.H. Pollak, D.E. Aspnes: Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 122 (1984)10.1063/1.94541 ↗
14. P.S. Pizani, C.E.M. Campos: J. Appl. Phys. 84, 6588 (1998)10.1063/1.369031 ↗
15. B.R. Shi, N. Cue, T.B. Xu, S. Au: J. Appl. Phys. 80, 2127 (1996)10.1063/1.363106 ↗
16. Anna Battaglia, Francesco Priolo, Emanuele Rimini, Giuseppe Ferla: Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 2622 (1990)10.1063/1.102856 ↗
17. R.A. Brown, J.S. Williams: J. Appl. Phys. 81, 7681 (1997)10.1063/1.365347 ↗