journal article·1994-12

Enhancement of the magneto-optical Kerr rotation in nonlinear optical response

U. Pustogowa, W. H�bner, K. H. Bennemann

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. G. Spierings, V. Koutsos, H.A. Wierenga, M.W.J. Prins, D. Abraham, Th. Rasing: Surf. Sci. 287/288, 747 (1993);10.1016/0039-6028(93)91065-W ↗
2. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 121, 109 (1993)10.1016/0304-8853(93)91160-9 ↗
3. O. A. Aktsipetrov, O. V. Braginskii, D. A. Esikov: Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 20, 259 (1990)10.1070/QE1990v020n03ABEH005622 ↗
4. J. Reif, J. C. Zink, C.-M. Schneider, J. Kirschner: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2878 (1991)10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2878 ↗
5. J. Reif, C. Rau, E. Matthias: Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1931 (1993)10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1931 ↗
6. L. M. Falicov, D. T. Pierce, S. D. Bader, R. Gronsky, K. B. Hathaway, H. Hopster, D. N. Lambeth, S. S. P. Parkin, G. A. Prinz, M. B. Salamon, I. K. Schuller, R. H. Victora: J. Mater. Res. 5, 1299 (1990)10.1557/JMR.1990.1299 ↗
7. P. M. Oppeneer, T. Maurer, J. Sticht, J. K�bler: Phys. Rev. B 45, 10924 (1992)10.1103/PhysRevB.45.10924 ↗
8. R. A. de Groot and F. M. Mueller: Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2024 (1983)10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2024 ↗
9. P. A. M. van der Heide et al.: J. Phys. F 15, L75 (1985)10.1088/0305-4608/15/3/007 ↗
10. W. Reim et al.: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 54?57, 1401 (1986)10.1016/0304-8853(86)90871-1 ↗
11. G. H. O. Daalderop et al.: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 74, 211 (1988)10.1016/0304-8853(88)90070-4 ↗
12. J. H. Wijngaard, C. Haas, R. A. de Groot: Phys. Rev. B 40, 9318 (1989)10.1103/PhysRevB.40.9318 ↗
13. U. Pustogowa, W. H�bner, K. H. Bennemann: Phys. Rev. B 48, 8607 (1993)10.1103/PhysRevB.48.8607 ↗
14. Note, this introduction of the Kerr angle makes in the nonlinear case essentially only sense for p-polarized incident light, since SH yield is predominantly p-polarized
15. N. Bloembergen, P. S. Pershan: Phys. Rev. 128, 606 (1962)10.1103/PhysRev.128.606 ↗
16. Note, this corresponds in [10] to setting ? = ? ? ? S
17. Note that ? S in the denominator of the second term of [Ref. 10, Eq.(4.12)] has to be replaced by ? R
18. G. S. Krinchik, V. A. Artem'ev: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1901 (1967); [Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 1080 (1968)]; J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1276 (1968)
19. H. Feil, C. Haas: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 65 (1987)10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.65 ↗
20. However, since the interband contributions should disappear for ? ? 0, one must replace the factor ? s.o. /h? by ? s.o. /h?1 for ? ? 0, where h?1 refers to the minimum interband transition energy
21. K. B�hmer, E. Matthias: (private communication)