Unoccupied surface states and surface barrier in metals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. M.W. Cole, M.H. Cohen: Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 1238 (1969)10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.1238 ↗
2. P.M. Echenique, J.B. Pendry: J. Phys. C11, 2065 (1978)
3. P.D. Johnson, N.V. Smith: Phys. Rev. B27, 2527 (1983)10.1103/PhysRevB.27.2527 ↗
4. V. Dose, W. Altmann, A. Goldmann, U. Kolac, J. Rogozik: Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1919 (1984)10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1919 ↗
5. D. Straub, F.J. Himpsel: Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1922 (1984)10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1922 ↗
6. G. Thörner, G. Borstel, V. Dose, J. Rogozik: Surf. Sci.157, L379 (1985)10.1016/0039-6028(85)90667-3 ↗
7. D.P. Woodruff, S.L. Hulbert, P.D. Johnson, N.V. Smith: Phys. Rev. B31, 4046 (1985)10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4046 ↗
8. V. Dose, U. Kolac, G. Borstel, G. Thörner: Phys. Rev. B29, 7030 (1984)10.1103/PhysRevB.29.7030 ↗
9. M. Donath, V. Dose, M. Glöbl, B. Senftinger: To be published
10. S.D. Kevan: Phys. Rev. B28, 2268 (1983)10.1103/PhysRevB.28.2268 ↗
11. R.O. Jones, P.J. Jennings, O. Jepsen: Phys. Rev. B29, 6474 (1984)10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6474 ↗
12. J.M. Baribeau, J.D. Carette, P.J. Jennings, R.O. Jones: Phys. Rev. B32, 6131 (1985)10.1103/PhysRevB.32.6131 ↗
13. M.N. Read: Phys. Rev. B32, 2677 (1985);10.1103/PhysRevB.32.2677 ↗
14. M.N. Read: Phys. Rev. B32, 2677 (1985); Appl. Surf. Sci. (to be published)10.1103/PhysRevB.32.2677 ↗
15. R.E. Dietz, E.G. McRae, R.L. Campbell: Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1139 (1980)10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1280 ↗
16. K. Giesen, F. Hage, F.J. Himpsel, H.J. Riess, W. Steinmann: To be published
17. J.B. Pendry: J. Phys. C14, 1381 (1981)
18. J. Rundgren, G. Mahnström: J. Phys. C10, 4671 (1977)
19. Note that the inner potential in Fig. 2a differs slightly from that in Fig. 2b since different values for the work function have been used
20. The position of the image plane is extremely sensitive to the binding energyE vac?E ofS 1 at?: Our present resultz im=?1.02 Å corresponds toE vac?E1=0.57±0.03 eV as reported in [15]. ForE vac?E 1 =0.48 eV,z im would shift to ?0.75 Å, i.e. to the metal side of the jellium edge
21. N.D. Lang, W. Kohn: Phys. Rev. B7, 3541 (1973)10.1103/PhysRevB.7.3541 ↗
22. S. Efrima: Surf. Sci.107, 337 (1981) and references therein10.1016/0039-6028(81)90629-4 ↗
23. P. Gies: J. Phys. C19, L 209 (1986)
24. In the notation of [17] [see (1)] this optimal barrierV B (z) is described by the parametersz 0=?1.02 Å,z?1=?2.1 Å,z?2=?0.002 Å,V 1=0,v R =?12.2 eV. The total potential used in the actual calculations isV(r)=V MT (r) + V B (z), whereV MT denotes the bulk muffintin potential for Cu as given in [23] and all energies are referred to the muffin-tin zero
25. G.A. Burdick: Phys. Rev.129, 138 (1963)10.1103/PhysRev.129.138 ↗
26. S.L. Hulbert, P.D. Johnson, M. Weinert, R.F. Garrett: Phys. Rev. B33, 760(1986)10.1103/PhysRevB.33.760 ↗