journal article·1976-10

Unidirectional saturation spectroscopy, II

Murray Sargent, Peter E. Toschek

Applied physics· Volume 11· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum optics and atomic interactions · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. M.SargentIII, P.E.Toschek, H.-G.Danielmeyer: Appl. Phys11, 55 (1976)10.1007/BF00895016 ↗
2. J.Hambenne, M.SargentIII: Phys. Rev. A13, 784 (1976)10.1103/PhysRevA.13.784 ↗
3. E.V.Baklanov, V.P.Chebotayev: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.61, 922 (1971) [Sov. Phys. JETP34, 490 (1972)]
4. M.SargentIII: Appl. Phys.9, 127 (1976)10.1007/BF00903949 ↗
5. S.H.Autler, C.H.Townes: Phys. Rev.100, 703 (1955)10.1103/PhysRev.100.703 ↗
6. A.Schabert, R.Keil, P.E.Toschek: Appl. Phys.6, 181 (1975)10.1007/BF00883749 ↗
7. An equation reference like (I. 11) refers to Eq. (11) of Ref. 1
8. The population differenceD is traditionally taken to decay at the rate −D/T 1 to its equilibrium valueD eq in the absence of the applied field interaction contribution (represented by $$\dot D_v $$ ), that is, $$\dot D = - (D - Deq )/T_1 + \dot D_v $$ . An upper level populationN a decaying with the rateγ a N a to a non-decaying ground lower levelb causes the populationN b to correspondingly increase at the same rate. Hence the population differenceD=N a −N b decays at double that rate, namely $$\dot D = - 2\gamma _a N_a + \dot D_v = - \gamma _a (D + N) + \dot D_v $$ , whereN=N a +N b . This givesT 1=1/γ a } andD eq=−N
9. M.Sargent III: “Relaxation of Hot Holes in p-Ge”, to be published
10. W.R.Bennett,Jr.: Phys. Rev.126, 580 (1962)10.1103/PhysRev.126.580 ↗
11. T.Hänsch, P.E.Toschek: IEEE J. Quant. Electr. QE-4, 530 (1968).10.1109/JQE.1968.1075383 ↗
12. Gain has also been predicted with completely modulated light: see S.Feneuille, M.-G.Schweighofer, G.Oliver: J. Phys., to be published
13. M.SargentIII, M.O.Scully, W.E.Lamb,Jr.:Laser Physics (Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, Mass 1974) Chap. 9
14. M.SargentIII: InApplications of Lasers to Atomic and Molecular Physics, Proc. Les Houches Summer School, Ed. by R. Balian and S. Haroche (North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam 1976)
15. P.E.Toschek: In——, Proc. Les Houches Summer School, Ed. by R. Balian and S. Haroche (North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam 1976) Les Houches lectures, pp. cit., [14]
16. C.Cohen-Tannoudji: 1968Cargèse Lectures in Physics 2, Ed. M.Lévy (Gordon and Breach, New York)
17. S.Haroche: Ann. Phys. Paris6, 189 (1971). See also K.Kolwas, M.Kolwas: Opt. Comm.17, 149 (1976) for a treatment involving AM modulated light10.1051/anphys/197114060189 ↗
18. S.Feneuille: J. Phys. B7, 1981 (1974), esp. Fig. 110.1088/0022-3700/7/15/006 ↗
19. P.Pringsheim:Fluorescence and Phosphorescence, (Interscience Publishers, New York 1949)
20. W.Holzer, W.F.Murphey, H.J.Bernstein: J. Chem. Phys.52, 399 (1970)10.1063/1.1672699 ↗
21. For Δn 2>2, two interactions of the saturator light must take place consecutively, thus contributing only to ordinary saturation
22. L.S.Vasilenko, V.P.Chebotayev, A.V.Shishayev: Sov. Phys. JETP Lett.12, 161 (1970)
23. B.Cagnac, G.Grynberg, F.Biraben: J. de Physique34, 845 (1973)10.1051/jphys:019730034010084500 ↗
24. E.V.Baklanov, V.P.Chebotayev: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.60, 552 (1971) [Sov. Phys. JETP33, 300 (1971)]
25. T.Hänsch, P.E.Toschek: Z. Physik236, 213 (1970)10.1007/BF01394503 ↗
26. J.B.Feldman, M.S.Feld: Phys. Rev. A5, 899 (1972)10.1103/PhysRevA.5.899 ↗
27. J.B.Feldman, M.S.Feld: Phys. Rev. A12, 1013 (1975)10.1103/PhysRevA.12.1013 ↗
28. T.Yajima: J. Phys. Soc. Jap.16, 1594 (1961)10.1143/JPSJ.16.1594 ↗
29. K.Shimoda, T.Shimizu: Progr. in Quantum Electronics2, 45 (1972)10.1016/0079-6727(73)90004-9 ↗
30. H.R.Schlossberg, A.Javan: Phys. Rev.150, 267 (1966)10.1103/PhysRev.150.267 ↗
31. M.SargentIII, W.E.Lamb,Jr., R.L.Fork: Phys. Rev.164, 450 (1967)10.1103/PhysRev.164.450 ↗
32. B.Decomps, M.Dumont: Compt. Rend. B265, 249 (1967)
33. M.SargentIII: Phys. Rev. A14, 524 (1976)10.1103/PhysRevA.14.524 ↗
34. See, e.g., G.W.Series: InQuantum Optics, Proc. Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, 1969, Ed. by S.M.Kay and A.Maitland (Academic Press, New York 1970) p. 395
35. W.Hanle: Z. Physik30, 93 (1924)10.1007/BF01331827 ↗
36. G.W.Series: Proc. Phys. Soc.89, 1017 (1966)10.1088/0370-1328/89/4/325 ↗
37. W.Heitler:The Quantum Theory of Radiation (Oxford University Press, London 1954)
38. A.Smekal: Z. Physik34, 81 (1925)10.1007/BF01328457 ↗
39. This point in the context of saturation spectroscopy was called to our attention by Paul Liao. An outline of the diagonalization procedure was given in C.Cohen-Tannoudji, B.Diu, F.Laloë:Méchanique quantique, ComplémentF IV, Sec. 2b (Hermann, Paris 1973)
40. B.R.Mollow: Phys. Rev.188, 1969 (1969)10.1103/PhysRev.188.1969 ↗
41. C.Cohen-Tannoudji: InLaser Spectroscopy, Proc. 2nd Intern. Laser Spectroscopy Conf., Megève, France, 1975 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1975) p. 32410.1007/3-540-07411-2_284 ↗