journal article·2020-11

Controlled nanofibers morphology and its influence on magnetic properties by electrospinning

Chen Cheng, Jianfeng Dai, Wei Feng, Zengpeng Li, Xinchao Wen

Applied Physics A· Volume 126· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, different forms of fibers can be obtained by adjusting the rotating speed of the collecting cylinder. This is due to the centripetal force generated by the collecting cylinder when the precursor colloid is on the collecting drum, which makes the diameter of nanofibers change significantly, thus forming different nanofibers and nanobelts. The average diameter of nanofibers increased from 0.09 μm to 0.79 μm, and finally decreased to 0.17 μm. The results show that the morphology of nanofibers also has a significant effect on the magnetic properties of the materials, which is due to the interaction of domain rotation and fiber crystallization. The coercivity of nanoribbons is 1145.39 Oe. The research in this field is of great significance to the industrial production of nanofibers and the morphology and application of nanofibers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Lamouri, L. Fkhar, E. Salmani, O. Mounkachi, M. Hamedoun, M.A. Ali, A. Benyoussef, H. Ez-Zahraouy, ApplPhys A-Mater 126, 5 (2020)
2. N. Labchir, A. Hannour, D. Vincent, A. Ihlal, M. Sajieddine, Appl Phys Mater 125, 11 (2019)
3. M.B. Mohamed, Appl Phys A-Mater 125, 11 (2019)10.1007/s00339-018-2314-x ↗
4. J. Kim, J. Lee, J.H. Ha, I.H. Song, Ceram Int 45, 14 (2019)
5. B. Fu, R.E. Lu, M. Liu, K. Gao, Y.G. Tong, X. Zhou, B.L. Guo, Y.D. Yang, Y.P. Wang, Mater Lett 157, 1 (2015)10.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.092 ↗
6. H. Hu, J.V. Buddingh, Z.J. Wang, B. Becher-Nienhaus, G.J. Liu, J Mater Chem C 6, 4 (2018)
7. M. Mohammadikish, K. Zamani, Spectrochim Acta 1, 205 (2018)
8. Q. Wu, M.M. Gao, G.Y. Zhang, Y.H. Zhang, S.W. Liu, C.X. Xie, H.L. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Huang, S.T. Yu, Nanotechnology 30, 18 (2019)
9. C.Y. Yu, X.W. Liang, T. Zhao, P.L. Zhu, G. Li, R. Cao, R. Sun, C.P. Wong, Mater Lett 4, 236 (2019)
10. L.B. Huang, W. Xu, J.H. Hao, Small 13, 43 (2017)
11. P.C. Jiang, Q. Wang, J.F. Dai, W.X. Li, Z.Q. Wei, Mater Lett 188, 7 (2017)
12. L.W. Huang, N.N. Bui, S.S. Manickam, J.R. McCutcheon, J PolymSci Pol Phys 49, 24 (2011)
13. P.K. Szewczyk, J. Knapczyk-Korczak, D.P. Ura, S. Metwally, A. Gruszczynski, U. Stachewicz, Mater Lett 1, 233 (2018)
14. S.L. Chen, H.Q. Hou, P. Hu, J.H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, S. Agarwal, Macromol Mater Eng 294, 11 (2009)10.1002/mame.200800229 ↗
15. M.J. Xu, M.X. Wang, H. Xu, H.G. Xue, H. Pang, Chem-Asian J 11, 21 (2016)