The effect of microstructure on magnetic properties of TLP bonded Sm2Co17 hard magnets
Source abstract
Abstract
A Sm2Co17 permanent magnet was successfully transient liquid phase bonded using AWS BNi-2 interlayer at 1100 °C for 60 min. Microstructural evolutions and chemical composition changes after TLP bonding of the samples were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The changes of magnetic properties of the base material due to the TLP process were evaluated using vibrating sample magnetometry. It was found that the bonded sample by 50-μm-thick interlayer foil majorly contained athermally solidified zone and brittle second phase, indicating that the bonding time is not sufficient for joining, while the bonded sample by 25-μm-thick foil was almost solidified isothermally. Also, the results showed that a considerable increase in coercivity, remanence and also maximum energy product was occurred after TLP bonding of Sm2Co17 permanent magnet. This increase was mainly attributed to the strong magnetic exchange coupling between FeCo- and Fe-rich borides (as soft magnets) and Sm–Co matrix (as hard magnet).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. R.T. Fingers, C.S. Rubertus, Application of high temperature magnetic materials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 3373–3375 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.90880510.1109/20.908805 ↗
2. H. Sepehri-Amin, J. Thielsch, J. Fischbacher, T. Ohkubo, T. Schrefl, O. Gutfleisch, K. Hono, Correlation of microchemistry of cell boundary phase and interface structure to the coercivity of Sm(Co0.784Fe0.100Cu0.088Zr0.028)7.19 sintered magnets. Acta Mater. 126, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.05010.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.050 ↗
3. J. Tian, X. Qu, S. Zhang, A. Farid, S.-W. Tao, X.-L. Du, Influence of heat treatment on fracture and magnetic properties of radially oriented Sm2Co17 permanent magnets. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 17, 491–495 (2007)10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60121-6 ↗
4. O. Gutfleisch, K.H. Müller, K. Khlopkov, M. Wolf, A. Yan, R. Schäfer, T. Gemming, L. Schultz, Evolution of magnetic domain structures and coercivity in high-performance SmCo2:17-type permanent magnets. Acta Mater. 54, 997–1008 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.02610.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.026 ↗
5. J.B. Sun, D. Han, C.X. Cui, W. Yang, L. Li, F. Yang, Effects of quenching speeds on microstructure and magnetic properties of novel SmCo6.9Hf0.1(CNTs)0.05 melt-spun ribbons. Acta Mater. 57, 2845–2850 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.03910.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.039 ↗
6. Z. Zhang, X. Song, W. Xu, Phase evolution and its effects on the magnetic performance of nanocrystalline SmCo7alloy. Acta Mater. 59, 1808–1817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.04710.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.047 ↗
7. H. Kronmüller, D. Goll, Analysis of the temperature dependence of the coercive field of Sm2Co17 based magnets. Scr. Mater. 48, 833–838 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00619-X10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00619-X ↗
8. Y. Zhang, W. Tang, G.C. Hadjipanayis, C. Chen, C. Nelson, K. Krishnan, Evolution of microstructure, microchemistry and coercivity in 2.17 type Sm-Co magnets with heat treatment. IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 2525–2527 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.95122310.1109/20.951223 ↗
9. J.C. Téllez-Blanco, X.C. Kou, R. Grössinger, E. Estévez-Rams, J. Fidler, B.M. Ma, Coercivity and magnetic anisotropy of sintered Sm2Co17-type permanent magnets. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 3928–3933 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36569910.1063/1.365699 ↗
10. M. Duerrschnabel, M. Yi, K. Uestuener, M. Liesegang, M. Katter, H.-J. Kleebe, B. Xu, O. Gutfleisch, L. Molina-Luna, Atomic structure and domain wall pinning in samarium-cobalt-based permanent magnets. Nat. Commun. 8, 54 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00059-910.1038/s41467-017-00059-9 ↗
11. J.B. Sun, Z.X. Zhang, C.X. Cui, W. Yang, L. Li, D. Han, B.L. Wang, Effect of Fe on the structure and magnetic properties of Sm–Co–Cu–Fe–Zr melt-spun ribbons. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 157, 72–76 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2008.12.01910.1016/j.mseb.2008.12.019 ↗
12. G.C. Hadjipanayis, W. Tang, Y. Zhang, S.T. Chui, J.F. Liu, C. Chen, H. Kronmuller, High temperature 2:17 magnets: relationship of magnetic properties to microstructure and processing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 3382–3387 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.90880810.1109/20.908808 ↗
13. J. Tian, X. Qu, S. Zhang, A. Farid, S. Tao, X. Du, Influence of heat treatment on fracture and magnetic properties of radially oriented Sm2Co17 permanent magnets. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 17, 491–495 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60121-610.1016/S1003-6326(07)60121-6 ↗
14. D.S. Duvall, W.A. Owczarski, D.F. Paulonis, TLP bonding: a new method for joining heat resistant alloys. Weld. J. (NY) 53, 203–214 (1974)
15. S. Steuer, R.F. Singer, Suppression of boride formation in transient liquid phase bonding of pairings of parent superalloy materials with different compositions and grain structures and resulting mechanical properties. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45, 3545–3553 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2304-310.1007/s11661-014-2304-3 ↗
16. M. Pouranvari, A. Ekrami, A.H. Kokabi, Microstructure evolution mechanism during post-bond heat treatment of transient liquid phase bonded wrought IN718 superalloy: an approach to fabricate boride-free joints. J. Alloys Compd. 723, 84–91 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.20610.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.206 ↗
17. R. Abdolvand, M. Atapour, M. Shamanian, A. Allafchian, The effect of bonding time on the microstructure and mechanical properties of transient liquid phase bonding between SAF 2507 and AISI 304. J. Manuf. Process. 25, 172–180 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.01310.1016/j.jmapro.2016.11.013 ↗
18. M. Khakian, S. Nategh, S. Mirdamadi, Effect of bonding time on the microstructure and isothermal solidification completion during transient liquid phase bonding of dissimilar nickel-based superalloys IN738LC and Nimonic 75. J. Alloys Compd. 653, 386–394 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.04410.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.044 ↗
19. B. Abbasi-Khazaei, A. Jahanbakhsh, R. Bakhtiari, TLP bonding of dissimilar FSX-414/IN-738 system with MBF-80 interlayer: the effect of homogenizing treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 651, 93–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.08710.1016/j.msea.2015.10.087 ↗
20. B.A. Khazaei, G. Asghari, R. Bakhtiari, TLP bonding of dissimilar FSX-414/IN738 system with MBF80 interlayer: prediction of solid/liquid interface location. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24, 996–1003 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63154-X10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63154-X ↗
21. M. Mosallaee, A. Ekrami, K. Ohsasa, K. Matsuura, Microstructural evolution in the transient-liquid-phase bonding area of IN-738LC/BNi-3/IN-738LC. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39, 2389–2402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-008-9588-010.1007/s11661-008-9588-0 ↗
22. F. Arhami, S.E. Mirsalehi, A. Sadeghian, Effect of bonding time on microstructure and mechanical properties of diffusion brazed IN-939. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 265, 219–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.021 ↗
23. G.I. Solovyev, K.E. Spear, Phase behavior in the Sm-B system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 55, 475–479 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11344.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11344.x ↗
24. L. Cataldo, A. Lefèvre, F. Ducret, M.-T. Cohen-Adad, C. Allibert, N. Valignat, Binary system SmCo: revision of the phase diagram in the Co rich field. J. Alloys Compd. 241, 216–223 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(96)02308-010.1016/0925-8388(96)02308-0 ↗
25. A.B. Gokhale, G.J. Abbaschian, The Si–Sm (silicon-samarium) system. Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 9, 582–585 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0288196010.1007/BF02881960 ↗
26. A.E. Ray, Metallurgical behavior of Sm(Co, Fe, Cu, Zr)z alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 2094–2096 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.33357510.1063/1.333575 ↗
27. W.D. Callister, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering, 5th edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2001)
28. C. Ma, Magnetic properties of exchange coupled SmCo5/FeCo composite particles synthesized by magnetic self-assembly. Chem. Phys. Lett. 696, 31–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.02.04210.1016/j.cplett.2018.02.042 ↗
29. S. Li, B. Gu, H. Bi, Z. Tian, G. Xie, Y. Zhu, Y. Du, Role of amorphous grain boundaries in nanocomposite NdFeB permanent magnets. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 7514–7518 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.152431110.1063/1.1524311 ↗