The effect of oscillatory interlayer exchange coupling on current-induced magnetization switching in pentalayer nanopillar alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The oscillatory interlayer exchange coupling (OXC) between ferromagnetic layers sandwiched by non-magnetic spacer layers plays a significant role in spintronic device function. In this work, the effect of OXC on the current-induced magnetization switching process in four different pentalayer nanopillar alloys is numerically investigated by solving the dynamical equation governed by the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert–Slonczewski (LLGS) equation. The four nanopillars consist of four ferromagnetic alloys, CoPt, CoFeB, Fe(85)B(13)Ni(_2) and EuO, which serve as pinned layers and free layers, with copper forming a spacer layer between all the layers. The critical current density required to switch the magnetization of the free layer is computed for all the devices and the values are (mathsf {}{0.6} imes 10 11{ ext {Am}}-2), (1.31 imes 10 11 { ext {Am}}-2), (2.24 imes 10 11 { ext {Am}}-2), (3.27 imes 10 11 { ext {Am}}-2) for CoPt, CoFeB, ({ ext {Fe}}85{ ext {B}}13{ ext {Ni}}_2) and EuO device, respectively. Then we studied how the thickness of the Cu layer influences the OXC field. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of Cu layer thickness on critical current density and magnetization switching time for all the four devices by numerically solving the LLGS equation and they exhibit oscillating behaviour. We can reduce the critical current density and switching time substantially by controlling the OXC field acting on the free layer and choosing the magnetic material having low saturation magnetization as the free layer. The OXC field is optimised by fixing the Cu spacer thickness from 1.7 to 1.9 nm in the pentalayer nanopillar device.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Z. Dai, W. Liu, X. Zhao, L. Liu, Y. Song, Z. Zhang, Field-free spin-orbit torque switching induced by interlayer exchange coupling in pt/co/ru/ni/pt multilayer. J. Appl. Phys. 130(24), 243901 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.007751510.1063/5.0077515 ↗
2. A. Litvinenko, V. Iurchuk, P. Sethi, S. Louis, V. Tyberkevych, J. Li, A. Jenkins, R. Ferreira, B. Dieny, A. Slavin, U. Ebels, Ultrafast sweep-tuned spectrum analyzer with temporal resolution based on a spin-torque nano-oscillator. Nano Lett. 20(8), 6104–6111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0219510.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02195 ↗
3. H. Bhoomeeswaran, I. Gowthaman, P. Sabareesan, Frequency and power enhanced magneto resistance-based tilted polarizer spin torque nano-oscillator. Appl. Phys. A 125, 513 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-2808-110.1007/s00339-019-2808-1 ↗
4. S. Bhatti, R. Sbiaa, A. Hirohata, H. Ohno, S. Fukami, S.N. Piramanayagam, Spintronics based random access memory: a review. Mater. Today 20(9), 530–548 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00710.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.007 ↗
5. P.P. Freitas, R. Ferreira, S. Cardoso, Spintronic sensors. Proc. IEEE 104(10), 1894–1918 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.257830310.1109/JPROC.2016.2578303 ↗
6. Z. Dai, W. Liu, X. Zhao, L. Liu, Z. Zhang, Controllable spin-orbit torque efficiency in pt/co/ru/co/pt multilayers with interlayer exchange couplings. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3(2), 611–618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.0c0105910.1021/acsaelm.0c01059 ↗
7. J.F. Bobo, L. Gabillet, M. Bibes, Recent advances in nanomagnetism and spin electronics. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 16(5), 471 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/5/00810.1088/0953-8984/16/5/008 ↗
8. P. Grünberg, R. Schreiber, Y. Pang, M. Brodsky, H. Sowers, Layered magnetic structures: evidence for antiferromagnetic coupling of fe layers across cr interlayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57(19), 2442 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.244210.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2442 ↗
9. M.A. Ruderman, C. Kittel, Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons. Phys. Rev. 96(1), 99 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.9910.1103/PhysRev.96.99 ↗
10. T. Kasuya, A theory of metallic ferro-and antiferromagnetism on zener’s model. Prog. Theor. Phys. 16(1), 45–57 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.16.5810.1143/PTP.16.58 ↗
11. K. Yosida, Magnetic properties of cu-mn alloys. Phys. Rev. 106(5), 893 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.89310.1103/PhysRev.106.893 ↗
12. P. Bruno, C. Chappert, Oscillatory coupling between ferromagnetic layers separated by a nonmagnetic metal spacer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1602–1605 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.160210.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1602 ↗
13. L. Néel, On a new mode of coupling between the magnetizations of two thin ferromagnetic layers. C. R. Acad. Sci. 255, 1676 (1962)
14. S. Demokritov, E. Tsymbal, P. Grünberg, W. Zinn, I.K. Schuller, Magnetic-dipole mechanism for biquadratic interlayer coupling. Phys. Rev. B 49, 720–723 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.72010.1103/PhysRevB.49.720 ↗
15. G.C. Han, C.C. Wang, J.J. Qiu, P. Luo, V. Ko, Interlayer couplings in a differential dual spin valve. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(19), 192502 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.358825610.1063/1.3588256 ↗
16. S. Zietek, P. Ogrodnik, W. Skowroński, P. Wisniowski, M. Czapkiewicz, T. Stobiecki, J. Barnas, The influence of interlayer exchange coupling in giant-magnetoresistive devices on spin diode effect in wide frequency range. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(12), 122410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493177110.1063/1.4931771 ↗
17. Y. Ishikuro, M. Kawaguchi, T. Taniguchi, M. Hayashi, Highly efficient spin-orbit torque in pt/co/ir multilayers with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling. Phys. Rev. B 101, 014404 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.01440410.1103/PhysRevB.101.014404 ↗
18. Z.A. Bekele, X. Lan, K. Meng, X. Liu, Enhanced field-free current-induced magnetization switching by interlayer exchange coupling with insulating spacer layer. J. Appl. Phys. 127(11), 113902 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.513562610.1063/1.5135626 ↗
19. P. Chongthanaphisut, K.J. Lee, S. Park, J. Jang, S. Lee, X. Liu, M. Dobrowolska, J.K. Furdyna, Temperature-induced antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling in (ga, mn)(as, p)-based trilayer structure. J. Appl. Phys. 127(18), 183902 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.000925210.1063/5.0009252 ↗
20. R. Maruyama, D. Yamazaki, H. Aoki, K. Akutsu-Suyama, T. Hanashima, N. Miyata, K. Soyama, T. Bigault, T. Saerbeck, P. Courtois, Improved performance of wide bandwidth neutron-spin polarizer due to ferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling. J. Appl. Phys. 130(8), 083904 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.006207210.1063/5.0062072 ↗
21. D. Aravinthan, P. Sabareesan, M. Daniel, Current induced magnetization switching in co/cu/ni-fe nanopillar with orange peel coupling. AIP Adv. 5(7), 077166 (2015)10.1063/1.4927546 ↗
22. D. Aravinthan, P. Sabareesan, M. Daniel, Spin transfer torque switching in pentalayer nanopillar with biquadratic coupling. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 31(8), 2567–2572 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-017-4517-310.1007/s10948-017-4517-3 ↗
23. D. Aravinthan, P. Sabareesan, K. Manikandan, J.B. Sudharsan, Magnetization switching in pentalayer nanopillar with oscillatory interlayer exchange coupling. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-022-06313-610.1007/s10948-022-06313-6 ↗
24. L. Berger, Multilayer configuration for experiments of spin precession induced by a dc current. J. Appl. Phys. 93(10), 7693 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.155577110.1063/1.1555771 ↗
25. G.D. Fuchs, I.N. Krivorotov, P.M. Braganca, N.C. Emley, A.G.F. Garcia, D.C. Ralph, R.A. Buhrman, Adjustable spin torque in magnetic tunnel junctions with two fixed layers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 152509 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.189976410.1063/1.1899764 ↗
26. N.C. Emley, I.N. Krivorotov, O. Ozatay, A.G.F. Garcia, J.C. Sankey, D.C. Ralph, R.A. Buhrman, Time-resolved spin-torque switching and enhanced damping in permalloy/cu/permalloy spin-valve nanopillars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 247204 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.24720410.1103/PhysRevLett.96.247204 ↗
27. D. Lyu, D. Zhang, D.B. Gopman, Y. Lv, O.J. Benally, J.-P. Wang, Ferromagnetic resonance and magnetization switching characteristics of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions with synthetic antiferromagnetic free layers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120(1), 012404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.007504310.1063/5.0075043 ↗
28. B.S. Chun, C. Fowley, M. Abid, J.M.D. Coey, Three-state dual spin valve structure. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43(2), 025002 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/2/02500210.1088/0022-3727/43/2/025002 ↗
29. S. Zhang, P.M. Levy, A. Fert, Mechanisms of spin-polarized current-driven magnetization switching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 236601 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.23660110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.236601 ↗
30. J. Sun, Applied physics: Spintronics gets a magnetic flute. Nature 425(6956), 359 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/425359a10.1038/425359a ↗
31. H. Meng, J. Wang, J.-P. Wang, Low critical current for spin transfer in magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 082504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.217912410.1063/1.2179124 ↗
32. D. Aravinthan, P. Sabareesan, M. Daniel, Reduction of switching time in pentalayer nanopillar device with different biasing configurations. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 421, 409–413 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.03810.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.038 ↗
33. Z. Li, S. Zhang, Magnetization dynamics with a spin-transfer torque. Phys. Rev. B 68, 024404 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.02440410.1103/PhysRevB.68.024404 ↗
34. H. Bhoomeeswaran, P. Sabareesan, Enhancing frequency and reducing the power of spin-torque nanooscillator by the generated oersted field. SPIN 10(02), 2050012 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S201032472050012510.1142/S2010324720500125 ↗
35. B. Chen, J. Lourembam, H.J. Chung, S.T. Lim, Design parameters for field-free spin-orbit torque switching of perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnets. J. Appl. Phys. 129(16), 163901 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.003374510.1063/5.0033745 ↗
36. A. Ceylan, C.C. Baker, S.K. Hasanain, S.I. Shah, Nonmonotonic concentration dependence of magnetic response in fe nanoparticle-polymer composites. Phys. Rev. B 72, 134411 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.13441110.1103/PhysRevB.72.134411 ↗
37. Ł Frkackowiak, P. Kuświk, M. Urbaniak, G.D. Chaves-O’Flynn, F. Stobiecki, Wide-range tuning of interfacial exchange coupling between ferromagnetic au/co and ferrimagnetic tb/fe (co) multilayers. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35042-x10.1038/s41598-018-35042-x ↗