journal article·2014-07

Radical species generation and their lifetime extension by a femtosecond and nanosecond dual-laser system

Cheng-Hsiang Lin, Zhi Liang, Jun Zhou, Hai-Lung Tsai

Applied Physics A· Volume 116· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

For many material processes, desired radical species at excited states are produced which interact with a given substrate for a certain period of time allowing chemical reactions between them to occur and complete. Hence, it is important to maintain the population of the excited radical species for an extended period of time, i.e., their lifetime, which is defined as the time for emission intensity to decay to 1/e of the initial intensity. In this study, a femtosecond–nanosecond (fs–ns) dual-laser system was employed to generate desired radical species via the fs laser and, then, to extend the lifetime of the radical species by the ns laser with different time delays between the two fs–ns laser pulses. The proposed method is demonstrated for a N2–CO2 mixture with CN as the radical species. The results show that the lifetime of CN radical species can be significantly extended, particularly the (3, 3) spectral line which was extended from 30 to 200 ns. By using a wavelength-tunable ns laser, the lifetime of most radical species can be extended which may increase the process efficiency for many material processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Laser Design and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. Z. Xie, Y. Zhou, X. He, Y. Gao, J. Park, H. Ling, L. Jiang, Y. Lu, Cryst. Growth. Des. 10, 1762 (2010)10.1021/cg9014515 ↗
2. P. Alers, W. Hanni, H.E. Hintermann, Diam. Relat. Mater. 2, 393–396 (1992)10.1016/0925-9635(93)90089-K ↗
3. T. McKindra, S. Patil, M.J. O’Keefe, Z.Q. Xie, Y.F. Lu, Mater. Charact. 61, 661 (2010)10.1016/j.matchar.2010.03.011 ↗
4. Y. You, A. Ito, T. Goto, Mater. Lett. 106, 11 (2013)10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.113 ↗
5. A. Ito, H. Kadokura, T. Kimura, T. Goto, J. Alloy. Compd. 489, 469 (2010)10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.088 ↗
6. K. Kitahama, K. Hirata, H. Nakamatsu, S. Kawai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 634 (1986)10.1063/1.97063 ↗
7. J. Narayan, V.P. Godbole, C.W. White, Science 252, 416 (1991)10.1126/science.252.5004.416 ↗
8. X. Chen, J. Mazumder, A. Purohit, Appl. Phys. A 52, 328 (1991)10.1007/BF00324774 ↗
9. T.J. Cook, D.H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 5059 (1972)10.1063/1.1678189 ↗
10. W.M. Jackson, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 4177 (1974)10.1063/1.1681715 ↗
11. J. M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Elementary Methods, (Wiley Professional PaperBack Series, New York, 1992)