Influence of environment on the corrosion of glass–metal connections
Source abstract
Abstract
‘Glass sensors’ of the eighteenth century Backer glass and the sixteenth century enamel from Limoges have been chosen for a series of experiments. Combinations of these materials with different base materials such as copper and bronze has been investigated. To create surface changes on the ‘glass sensor’, a corrosion process was induced in a controlled environment. A variety of corrosive agents such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, water and formaldehyde were used. The sample immersed in the corrosive solution was exposed alternately to light and high temperature for a total of 38 weeks. During this period, macroscopic and microscopic observations were made and series of tests such as SEM/EDS and Raman spectroscopy were performed on the surface of the samples. ICP-MS methods were used to determine the change in the chemical composition of the solutions where the samples had corroded. The primary aim of this study was to identify the impact of a number of external corrosive variables such as temperature, humidity and local environment to identify the most damaging environments for glass–metal objects. The obtained results showed the chemical and physical phenomena acting on the surface of the glass, metal or in the place of their joints. Information obtained on this study was used to explain the influence of the environment on the surface of glass–metal materials. Results can be used in the design of conservation work as well as for sustainable conservation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conservation Techniques and Studies · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Greiner-Wronowa, L. Stoch, Influence of environment on surface of the ancient glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 196, 118–127 (1996)10.1016/0022-3093(95)00563-3 ↗
2. M. Del Monte, in The cultural heritage: causes of damage, ed by N.S. Baer, C. Sabbioni, A.I. Sors. I Science, Technology, and European cultural heritage: proceedings of the European Symposium, Bologna, June 13–16, Butterworth-Heinemann Publishers, Italy, 1989, 67–77
3. D. Camuffo, Acid rain and deterioration of monuments: how old is the phenomenon? Atmos. Environ. Part B Urban Atmos. 26(2), 241–247 (1992)10.1016/0957-1272(92)90027-P ↗
4. E. Speel, H. Bronk, Enamel Painting. Materials and Recipes in Europe from c.1500 to c. 1920, Berliner Beitrage zur Archeometrie 2001; 18: 43–100
5. I. Biron, M. Verità, Analytical investigation on Renaissance Venetian enamelled glasses from the Louvre collections. J. Arch. Sci. 39(8), 2706–2713 (2012)10.1016/j.jas.2012.03.014 ↗
6. O. Schalm, V. Van der Linden, P. Frederickx, S. Luyten, G. Van der Snickt, J. Caen, D. Schryvers, K. Janssens, E. Cornelis, D. Van Dyck, M. Schreiner, Enamels in stained glass windows: preparation, chemical composition, microstructure and causes of deterioration. Spectrochim. Acta. Part B 64(8), 812–820 (2009)10.1016/j.sab.2009.06.005 ↗
7. D. G. Bonne, I. Biron, P. Trocellier, The origin of the degradation of painted enamels, in: Glass, Ceramics and Related Materials Interim Meeting of the ICOM-CC Working Group, Vantaa, September 13–16, Finland, 1998, n.p
8. L.L. Hench, Characterization of glass corrosion and durability. J. Non Cryst. Solids 19, 27–39 (1975)10.1016/0022-3093(75)90067-8 ↗
9. S. Greiff, J. Schuster, Technological study of enamelling on roman glass: the nature of opacifying, decolourizing and fining agents used with the glass beakers from Lubsow (Lubieszewo, Poland). J. Cult. Herit. 9, 27–32 (2008)10.1016/j.culher.2008.06.006 ↗
10. P. Colomban, On-site Raman identification and dating of ancient glasses: a review of procedures and tools. J. Cult. Herit. 9, 55–60 (2008)10.1016/j.culher.2008.06.005 ↗
11. D. Neff, P. Dillmann, L. Bellot-Gurlet, G. Beranger, Corrosion of iron archeological artefacts in soil: characterization of the corrosion system. Corros. Sci. 47(2), 515–535 (2005)10.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.029 ↗
12. A. Giumlia-Mair, On surface analysis and archeometallurgy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 239(1–2), 35–43 (2005)10.1016/j.nimb.2005.06.178 ↗
13. M. Vilarigues, P. Redol, A. Machado, P.A. Rodrigues, L.C. Alves, R.C. Silva, Corrosion of 15th and early 16th century stained glass from the monastery of Batalha studied with external ion beam. Mater. Charact. 62, 211–217 (2011)10.1016/j.matchar.2010.12.001 ↗
14. J. Kunicki-Goldfinger, Preventive conservation strategy for glass collections. Identification of glass objects susceptible to crizzling, in: Cultural heritage research: a Pan-European challenge. Proceedings of the 5th EC conference, Kraków, May 16–18, ICSC, Poland, 2002, 301–304
15. P. Ricciardi, P. Colomban, A. Tournié, M. Macchiarola, N. Ayed, A non-invasive study of Raman Age mosaic glass tesserae by means of Raman spectroscopy. J. Arch. Sci. 36(11), 2551–2559 (2009)10.1016/j.jas.2009.07.008 ↗
16. M. Melcher, R. Wiesinger, M. Schreiner, Degradation of glass artifacts: application of modern surface analytical techniques. Am. Chem. Soc. Public 43(6), 916–926 (2010)10.1021/ar9002009 ↗
17. E. Greiner-Wronowa, C. Paluszkiewicz, L. Stoch, Applying FTIR spectroscopy in the study of archeometric sensor glasses. J. Molec. Struct. 511–512, 199–204 (1999)10.1016/S0022-2860(99)00160-X ↗
18. A. Adriaens, M.G. Dowsett, Electron microscopy and its role in cultural heritage studies. Compr. Anal. Chem. 42, 73–128 (2004)10.1016/S0166-526X(04)80007-2 ↗
19. M.R. Pinasco, M.G. Ienco, P. Piccardo, G. Pellati, E. Stagno, Metallographic approach to the investigation of metallic archaeological objects. Anal. Chim. 7, 553–574 (2007)10.1002/adic.200790037 ↗
20. C. Robinet, L. Coupry, K. Eremin, C. Hall, Raman investigation of the structural changes during alteration of historic glasses by organic pollutants. J. Ram. Spectrosc. 37, 1278–1286 (2006)10.1002/jrs.1549 ↗