Fabrication of biomimetic dry-adhesion structures through nanosphere lithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Components with surface nanostructures suitable for biomimetic dry adhesion have a great potential in applications such as gecko tape, climbing robots, and skin patches. In this study, a nanosphere lithography technique with self-assembly nanospheres was developed to achieve effective and efficient fabrication of dry-adhesion structures. Self-assembled monolayer nanospheres with high regularity were obtained through tilted dip-coating. Reactive-ion etching of the self-assembled nanospheres was used to fabricate nanostructures of different shapes and aspect ratios by varying the etching time. Thereafter, nickel molds with inverse nanostructures were replicated using the electroforming process. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) nanostructures were fabricated through a gas-assisted hot-embossing method. The pulling test was performed to measure the shear adhesion on the glass substrate of a sample, and the static contact angle was measured to verify the hydrophobic property of the structure. The enhancement of the structure indicates that the adhesion force increased from 1.2 to 4.05 N/cm2 and the contact angle increased from 118.6° to 135.2°. This columnar structure can effectively enhance the adhesion ability of PDMS, demonstrating the potential of using nanosphere lithography for the fabrication of adhesive structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Arzt, S. Gorb, R. Spolenak, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 10603 (2003)10.1073/pnas.1534701100 ↗
2. K. Autumn, A.M. Peattie, Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 1081 (2002)10.1093/icb/42.6.1081 ↗
3. K. Autumn, J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3558 (2006)10.1242/jeb.02469 ↗
4. M. Xu, F. Du, S. Ganguli, A. Roy, L. Dai, Nat. Commun. 7, (2016)10.1038/ncomms13450 ↗
5. O.J. Chaudhary, E.P. Calius, J.V. Kennedy, M. Dickinson, T. Loho, J. Travas-Sejdic, Eur. Polym. J. 84, 13 (2016)10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.08.035 ↗
6. Y. Cho, G. Kim, Y. Cho, S.Y. Lee, H. Minsky, K.T. Turner, D.S. Gianola, S. Yang, Adv. Mater. 27, 7788 (2015)10.1002/adma.201503347 ↗
7. L. Ge, S. Sethi, L. Ci, P.M. Ajayan, A. Dhinojwala, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 10792 (2007)10.1073/pnas.0703505104 ↗
8. J. Lee, R.S. Fearing, K. Komvopoulos, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 191910 (2008)10.1063/1.3006334 ↗
9. M.L.B. Palacio, B. Bhushan, S.R. Schricker, Mater. Lett. 92, 409 (2013)10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.023 ↗
10. M.K. Choi, H. Yoon, K. Lee, K. Shin, Langmuir. 27, 2132 (2011)10.1021/la104839a ↗
11. D. Xia, S.R.J. Brueck, Nano Lett. 4, 1295 (2004)10.1021/nl049355x ↗
12. B.G. Prevo, O.D. Velev, Langmuir. 20, 2099 (2004)10.1021/la035295j ↗
13. D. Nagao, R. Kameyama, H. Matsumoto, Y. Kobayashi, M. Konno, Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 317, 722 (2008)10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.12.011 ↗
14. T.J. Wang, K.C. Hsu, Y.C. Liu, C.H. Lai, H.P. Chiang, J. Opt. 18, 055006 (2016)10.1088/2040-8978/18/5/055006 ↗
15. Y.K. Su, J.J. Chen, C.L. Lin, S.M. Chen, W.L. Li, C.C. Kao, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 6706 (2008)10.1143/JJAP.47.6706 ↗
16. L. Ji, Y.F. Chang, B. Fowler, Y.C. Chen, T.M. Tsai, K.C. Chang, M.C. Chen, T.C. Chang, S.M. Sze, E.T. Yu, J.C. Lee, Nano Lett. 14, 813 (2014)10.1021/nl404160u ↗
17. J.Y. Shiu, C.W. Kuo, P. Chen, C.Y. Mou, Chem. Mater. 16, 561 (2004)10.1021/cm034696h ↗