Building of nested components by a double-nozzle droplet deposition process
Source abstract
Abstract
According to the nested components jointed with multiple parts,a double-nozzle droplet deposition process was put forward in this paper, and the experimental system was developed. Through the research on the properties of support materials and the process of double-nozzle droplet deposition, the linkage control of the metal droplet deposition and the support material extrusion was realized, and a nested component with complex construction was fabricated directly. Compared with the traditional forming processes, this double-nozzle deposition process has the advantages of short cycle, low cost and so on. It can provide an approach way to build the nested parts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. J.H. Liu, Y.S. Shi, Z.L. Lu et al., Manufacturing metal parts via indirect SLS of composite elemental powders [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 444(1–2), 146–152 (2007)
2. M. Shellabear, A. Danzig, M. Heugel, J. Kotila, O. Nyrhilä. The breakthrough to 20 micron layers increasing precision and efficiency in direct metal laser-sintering[C]. Proceedings of the uRapid 2001. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2001: 256–267
3. F.F Noecker Ii, J.N DuPont, in Functionally graded copper—steel using LENS [trademark] process[C]//F, ed. by D.S. Marquis, D.L. Bourell. Rapid prototyping of materials, 1st edn. (Columbus OH United States: Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2002), pp. 139–147
4. M. Matsumoto, M. Shiomi, K. Osakada et al., Finite element analysis of single layer forming on metallic powder bed in rapid prototyping by selective laser processing [J]. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 42(1), 61–67 (2002)10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00093-1 ↗
5. P. Li et al., Direct laser fabrication of thin-walled metal parts under open-loop control. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 47, 996–1002 (2007)10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.017 ↗
6. X. Xiong, H. Zhang, G. Wang, Metal direct prototyping by using hybrid plasma deposition and milling [J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(1), 124–130 (2009)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.059 ↗
7. T. Ando, J. Chun, C. Blue, Uniform droplets benefit advanced particulates [J]. Met. Powder Rep. 54(3), 30–34 (2009)
8. S. Li, P. Wu, W. Zhou, T. Ando, Kinetics of heterogeneous nucleation of gas-atomized Sn-5 mass% Pb droplets [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 473(1–2), 206–212 (2008)10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.109 ↗
9. S. Cheng, S. Chandra, A penumatic droplet-on-demand generator [J]. Exp. Fluids 34, 755–762 (2003)10.1007/s00348-003-0629-6 ↗
10. X.C. Stewart, L. Tiegang, S. Chandra, Producing molten metal droplets with a pneumatic droplet-on-demand generator [J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 159, 295–302 (2005)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.016 ↗
11. M. Fang, S. Chandra, C.B. Park, Experiments on remelting and solidification of molten metal droplets deposited in vertical columns [J]. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME 129(2), 311–318 (2007)10.1115/1.2540630 ↗
12. S.L. Li et al., The fusion process of successive droplets impinging onto a substrate surface. J. Appl. Phys. A. 120, 35–42 (2015)10.1007/s00339-015-9146-8 ↗
13. J. Du et al., Numerical investigation of pileup process in metal micro-droplet deposition manufacture [J]. Micromachines 31, 1429–1444 (2014)10.3390/mi5041429 ↗
14. Y.H. Chao et al., Manufacturing of micro thin-walled metal parts by micro-droplet deposition. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212, 484–491 (2012)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.015 ↗
15. M. Fang et al., Building three-dimensional objects by deposition of molten metal droplets. Rapid Prototyping J. 14, 44–52 (2008)10.1108/13552540810841553 ↗
16. W.B. Cao, Y. Miyamoto, Freeform fabrication of aluminum parts by direct deposition of molten aluminum. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 173, 209–212 (2006)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.028 ↗