Radicals transport modelling in NANOJET
Source abstract
Abstract
NANOJET (Nanonozzle Plasma Jet Microfabrication Technology) based on scanning micro/nano-nozzle is a competitive candidate for high-resolution direct nano-structuring of different materials. In this device, electrically neutral radicals created in plasma discharge are transported through a small tapered capillary (or nozzle). A short distance between the nozzle and treated surface allows the localized chemical interaction. A description of free radicals transport through a high aspect ratio hollow tip and localized etching and high etching rates without ion bombardment are demonstrated in this work. A Monte Carlo (MC) based simulation model is used to study the transport and kinetic properties of atomic oxygen gas flow through the finite length cylindrical nozzle with different aspect ratios. The general aim of these investigations is to determine and optimize the radicals transport and optimal etching capability. The MC-simulations are compared with detailed experimental measurements, carried out for different nozzle sizes, etching rates, and distances between the nozzle outlet and the sample. To explore the influence of the oxygen gas flow kinetic properties on the etching parameters, the oxygen atoms transmission is simulated for a variety of the nozzle aspect ratios. This article presents the fundamental considerations and the experimental proofs of the outlined nanofabrication technique.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang M, et al. (2002) Nanotechnology 13:21210.1088/0957-4484/13/2/315 ↗
2. Voigt J (2001) Untersuchung des Transportes plasmaerzeugter Radikale durch enge Aperturen und deren Wechselwirkung mit einem Festkörper. PhD Thesis, University of Kassel, Germany
3. Voigt J et al. (1999) J Vac Sci Technolog B 17:276410.1116/1.591060 ↗
4. Rangelow IW et al. (2001) J Vac Sci Technolog B 19:272310.1116/1.1415504 ↗
5. Voigt J et al. (2001) Microel Engineering 57–58:103510.1016/S0167-9317(01)00447-6 ↗
6. Rabinovych O et al. (2004) Microel Engineering 73–74:84310.1016/S0167-9317(04)00231-X ↗
7. Binder K (1986) Monte Carlo methods in statistical physics. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-82803-4 ↗
8. Hoffmann KH, Schreiber M (1996) Computational physics. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-85238-1 ↗
9. Garsia AL (1994) Numerical methods for physics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
10. Greaves SC, Linnet JW (1959) Trans Faraday Soc 55:134610.1039/TF9595501346 ↗
11. Normand F et al. (1995) Plasma Chem Plasma Proc 15:17310.1007/BF01459695 ↗
12. Callahan R, Raupp G, Beaudoin S (2002) J Vac Sci Technol B 20:187010.1116/1.1501584 ↗
13. Vogel H (1997) Gerthsen: Physik. Springer, Berlin
14. Hurlbut FC (1957) J Appl Phys 28:84410.1063/1.1722872 ↗
15. Steckelmacher W et al. (1978) J Physics D 11:155310.1088/0022-3727/11/11/015 ↗
16. Clausing P (1932) Annalen der Physik, 5 Folge, Band 12:96110.1002/andp.19324040804 ↗
17. Murphy DM (1989) J Vac Sci Technol A 7:307510.1116/1.576317 ↗
18. Boulon O et al. (1999) J Vac Sci Technol A 17:208010.1116/1.581730 ↗