journal article·2013-09

Influence of contact shape on AlGaN/GaN Schottky diode prepared on Si with thick buffer layer

Manoj Kumar, Hiroto Sekiguchi, Hiroshi Okada, Akihiro Wakahara

Applied Physics A· Volume 112· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

A report on the fabrication and characterization of high performance conventional and ring-shaped AlGaN/GaN Schottky barrier diode on Si is presented. The resulting device exhibited low leakage current, which led to a detectivity performance of 3.48×1013 and 1.76×1013 cm Hz1/2 W−1, respectively, for both conventional and ring-shaped Schottky diode. The differential resistances of both devices were obtained at approximately 1.37×1012 and 1.41×1013 Ω, respectively. The zero bias peak responsivities of conventional and ring-shaped Schottky diodes were estimated to be 3.18 and 2.08 A cm−2/W, respectively. The typical UV to visible rejection ratio was observed over three orders of magnitude at zero bias. The C–V measurements was used to calculate and analyze the polarization sheet charge density of the AlGaN barrier layer by using self-consistently solving Schrodinger’s and Poisson’s equations. It is demonstrated that the ring shape of the Schottky barrier has higher polarization sheet charge density, which has the consequence that the Schottky shape has influence on the strain of the AlGaN barrier layer.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. H. Miyamoto, Phys. Status Solidi C 3, 2254 (2006)10.1002/pssc.200565285 ↗
2. C. Mizue, Y. Hori, M. Miczek, T. Hashizume, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 021001 (2011)10.1143/JJAP.50.021001 ↗
3. N. Biyikli, O. Aytur, I. Kimukin, T. Tut, E. Ozbay, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3272 (2002)10.1063/1.1516856 ↗
4. E. Monroy, F. Calle, J.L. Pau, E. Munoz, F. Omnes, B. Beaumont, P. Gibart, J. Cryst. Growth 230, 537 (2001)10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01305-7 ↗
5. C.J. Collins, T. Li, D.J.H. Lambert, M.M. Wong, R.D. Dupuis, J.C. Campbell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2810 (2000)10.1063/1.1322374 ↗
6. Y. Huang, D.J. Chen, H. Lu, H.B. Shi, P. Han, R. Zhang, Y.D. Zheng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 243503 (2010)
7. D.G. Zhao, S. Zhang, D.S. Jiang, J.J. Zhu, Z.S. Liu, H. Wang, S.M. Zhang, B.S. Zhang, H. Yang, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 053701 (2011)
8. S.J. Chang, H. Hung, Y.C. Lin, M.H. Wu, H. Kuan, R.M. Lin, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2471 (2007)10.1143/JJAP.46.2471 ↗
9. H. Jiang, T. Egawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 121121 (2007)
10. Y.Z. Chiou, Y.C. Lin, C. K. Wang, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 28, 264 (2007)10.1109/LED.2007.893224 ↗
11. P.E. Malinowski, J.Y. Duboz, P.D. Moor, K. Minoglou, J. John, S.M. Horcajo, F. Semond, E. Frayssinet, P. Verhoeve, M. Esposito, B. Giordanengo, A. BenMoussa, R. Mertens, C. Van Hoof, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 141104 (2011)10.1063/1.3576914 ↗
12. A. Osinsky, S. Gangopadhyay, J.W. Yang, R. Gaska, D. Kuksenkov, H. Temkinc, I.K. Shmagin, Y.C. Chang, J.F. Muth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 551 (1998)10.1063/1.120755 ↗
13. K.Y. Park, B.J. Kwon, Y.H. Cho, S.A. Lee, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 124505 (2005)
14. E.H. Rhoderick, Metal–Semiconductor Contacts. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1978)
15. H. Norde, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 5052 (1979)10.1063/1.325607 ↗
16. S.K. Cheung, N.W. Cheung, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 85 (1986)10.1063/1.97359 ↗
17. M.P. Hernandez, C.F. Alonso, J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. 34, 1157 (2001)10.1088/0022-3727/34/8/305 ↗
18. Y.R. Jung, J.K. Kim, J.H. Lee, Y.H. Lee, M.B. Lee, J.H. Lee, S.H. Hahm, Phys. Status Solidi C 0, 99 (2002)10.1002/pssc.200390126 ↗
19. P.E. Malinowski, J.Y. Duboz, P.D. Moor, J. John, K. Minoglou, P. Srivastava, H. Abdul, M.K. Patel, H. Osman, F. Semond, E. Frayssinet, J.F. Hochedez, B. Giordanengo, C.V. Hoof, R. Mertens, Phys. Status Solidi C 8, 2476 (2011)10.1002/pssc.201000936 ↗
20. S. Donati, Photodetectors: Devices, Circuits, and Applications (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000)
21. S.J. Chang, K.H. Lee, P.C. Chang, Y.C. Wang, C.H. Kuo, S.L. Wu, IEEE Sens. J. 9, 87 (2009)10.1109/JSEN.2008.2011070 ↗
22. A.Y. Polyakov, N.B. Smirnov, A.V. Govorkov, A.V. Markov, A.M. Dabiran, A.M. Wowchak, A.V. Osinsky, B. Cui, P.P. Chow, S.J. Pearton, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 232116 (2007)10.1063/1.2823607 ↗
23. S. Saadaoui, M.M.B. Salem, M. Gassoumi, H. Maaref, C. Gaquiere, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 013701 (2011)10.1063/1.3600229 ↗
24. W. Chikhaoui, J.M. Bluet, C. Bru-Chevallier, C. Dua, R. Aubry, Phys. Status Solidi C 7, 92 (2010)10.1002/pssc.200982634 ↗
25. J. Zhao, Z. Lin, T.D. Corrigan, Z. Wang, Z. You, Z. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 173507 (2007)
26. Z. Lin, W. Lu, J. Lee, D. Liu, J.S. Flynn, G.R. Brandes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4364 (2007)10.1063/1.1584077 ↗
27. O. Ambacher, J. Smart, J.R. Shealy, N.G. Weimann, K. Chu, M. Murphy, W.J. Schaff, L.F. Eastman, R. Dimitrov, L. Wittmer, M. Stutzmann, W. Rieger, J. Hilsenbeck, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3222 (1999)10.1063/1.369664 ↗
28. E.T. Yu, G.J. Sullivan, P.M. Asbeck, C.D. Wang, D. Qiao, S.S. Lau, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2794 (1997)10.1063/1.120138 ↗
29. G. Martin, A. Botchkarev, A. Rockett, H. MorKoc, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2541 (1996)10.1063/1.116177 ↗
30. D. Brunner, H. Angerer, E. Bustarret, F. Freudenberg, R. Hopler, R. Dimitrov, O. Ambacher, M. Stutzmann, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 5090 (1997)10.1063/1.366309 ↗
31. P.D. Ye, B. Yang, K.K. Ng, J. Bude, G.D. Wilk, S. Halder, J.C.M. Hwang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 063501 (2005)