Investigation on Steady-State and Transient Boundary Condition Scenarios for Optimizing the Creation of Multiport Surrogate Thermal Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Board-level simulation has to consider, at the earliest stage of the conception, the impact of the vicinity of numerous high- and medium-powered devices. In 1996, the European consortium DELPHI defined the concept of a surrogate, or compact thermal model (CTM), to minimize the computation times from days to minutes. A DELPHI-style CTM resumes an electronic component as a simple cuboid form and a network of resistors that links a single temperature-sensitive node to the major surfaces of heat extraction. That steady-state network is derived from a detailed numerical model, which is subjected to a set of boundary conditions (BCs) applied on its external surfaces. At first, this paper investigates the combinations of various sets of scenarios to generate and to test a multiport surrogate model. The objective is to define the lowest number of numerical simulations required while keeping the highest accuracy level of the derived BC-independent (BCI) thermal network. Then, this paper demonstrates the need of a smart selection of the isothermal surfaces to create a most relevant surrogate model. Finally, using that calibrated steady-state model, an extension of the DELPHI method to create multiport dynamic surrogate model is proposed as well as a set of BCs dedicated to transient network fitting.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heat Transfer and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/ITHERM.2014.689239010.1109/ITHERM.2014.6892390 ↗
2. 10.1109/THERMINIC.2014.697249110.1109/THERMINIC.2014.6972491 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00065-310.1016/S0169-7439(98)00065-3 ↗
4. 10.1109/THERMINIC.2015.738963510.1109/THERMINIC.2015.7389635 ↗
5. 10.1109/THERMINIC.2015.738961810.1109/THERMINIC.2015.7389618 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.microrel.2016.09.02010.1016/j.microrel.2016.09.020 ↗
7. Extension of the DELPHI methodology to dynamic compact thermal model of electronic component
8. 10.1109/STHERM.2012.618882110.1109/STHERM.2012.6188821 ↗
9. 10.1109/ITHERM.2017.799250310.1109/ITHERM.2017.7992503 ↗
10. 10.1109/TCAPT.2005.84853810.1109/TCAPT.2005.848538 ↗
11. The application of a genetic algorithm to develop a compact thermal model
12. 10.1109/ESIME.2010.546451410.1109/ESIME.2010.5464514 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.11.01510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.11.015 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.400483010.1115/1.4004830 ↗
15. 10.1109/ITHERM.2010.550140510.1109/ITHERM.2010.5501405 ↗
16. 2008
17. 10.1109/TCAPT.2002.80800910.1109/TCAPT.2002.808009 ↗
18. 10.2298/TSCI120826072M10.2298/TSCI120826072M ↗