RF Performance Benchmarking of TSV Integrated Surface Electrode Ion Trap for Quantum Computing
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface electrode ion trap is highly promising for practical quantum computing due to its superior controllability on the trapped ions. With advanced microfabrication techniques, silicon has been developed as an ion trap substrate for delicate surface electrodes design and monolithic electro-optical components integration. However, the high RF loss of silicon hinders the possible large-scale implementation. In this work, we demonstrate a through silicon via (TSV) integrated ion trap, which has low RF loss due to the elimination of wire bonding (WB) pads on the surface and the miniaturization of form factor. We also fabricate two types of conventional WB traps with or without a grounding screen layer. The RF performances of different ion traps are tested and compared, in terms of on-chip S-parameter, postpackaging resonance, and resulting power loss. The results show that the TSV trap has low S21 (~0.2 dB at 50 MHz), high $Q$ factor (~22), and low power loss (0.26 W) compared to WB traps. In addition, 3-D finite element modeling (FEM) is employed for electric field visualization and RF loss analysis of different traps. The extracted results from the modeling show a decent agreement with the measurements. In addition to various RF tests, the design, fabrication, and ion trapping operation of different ion traps are presented. This work provides insights into RF loss of ion trapping devices and offers a new solution for RF loss reduction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Photonic and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.489206110.1063/1.4892061 ↗
2. Demonstration of a microfabricated surface electrode ion trap
3. 10.2172/123700310.2172/1237003 ↗
4. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/11306810.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113068 ↗
5. 10.1109/EPTC50525.2020.931500310.1109/EPTC50525.2020.9315003 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.05300110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.053001 ↗
7. 10.26421/QIC5.6-110.26421/QIC5.6-1 ↗
8. Silicon (Si)- Datasheet · 2013
9. 10.1109/TCPMT.2019.295866110.1109/TCPMT.2019.2958661 ↗
10. Functional surface ion traps on a 12-inch glass wafer for quantum applications
11. 10.1063/1.508816410.1063/1.5088164 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03312810.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033128 ↗
13. 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.28110.1103/RevModPhys.75.281 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.03340210.1103/PhysRevA.78.033402 ↗
15. Ytterbium ion trapping and microfabrication of ion trap arrays
16. 10.1038/s42254-020-0182-810.1038/s42254-020-0182-8 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.161802011410.1073/pnas.1618020114 ↗
18. Materials challenges for trapped-ion quantum computers
19. 10.1038/s41467-019-13534-210.1038/s41467-019-13534-2 ↗
20. 10.1038/nphys17110.1038/nphys171 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.02320110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.023201 ↗
22. 10.1109/EPTC.2009.541645810.1109/EPTC.2009.5416458 ↗
23. 10.1063/5.004253110.1063/5.0042531 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.03341110.1103/PhysRevA.76.033411 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.491738510.1063/1.4917385 ↗
26. 10.1109/ECTC.2009.507408010.1109/ECTC.2009.5074080 ↗