journal article·2013-01Open access

>21% Efficient Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells on n- and p-Type Wafers Compared

Antoine Descoeudres, Zachary C. Holman, Loris Barraud, Sophie Morel, Stefaan De Wolf, Christophe Ballif

IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics· Volume 3· Issue 1

Abstract

The properties and high-efficiency potential of front- and rear-emitter silicon heterojunction solar cells on n- and p-type wafers were experimentally investigated. In the low-carrier-injection range, cells on p-type wafers suffer from reduced minority carrier lifetime, mainly due to the asymmetry in interface defect capture cross sections. This leads to slightly lower fill factors than for n-type cells. By using high-quality passivation layers, however, these losses can be minimized. High open-circuit voltages ( V oc s) were obtained on both types of float zone (FZ) wafers: up to 735 mV on n-type and 726 mV on p-type. The best V oc measured on Czochralski (CZ) p-type wafers was only 692 mV, whereas it reached 732 mV on CZ n-type. The highest aperture-area certified efficiencies obtained on 4 cm 2 cells were 22.14% ( V oc = 727 mV , FF = 78.4%) and 21.38% ( V oc = 722 mV, FF = 77.1%) on n- and p-type FZ wafers, respectively, proving that heterojunction schemes can perform almost as well on high-quality p-type as on n-type wafers. To our knowledge, this is the highest efficiency ever reported for a full silicon heterojunction solar cell on a p-type wafer, and the highest V oc on any p-type crystalline silicon device with reasonable FF.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.37118610.1063/1.371186 ↗
2. hovel · Semiconductors and Semimetals Volume 11 Solar Cells · 1975
3. 10.1063/1.364189910.1063/1.3641899 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.351173710.1063/1.3511737 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.309128310.1063/1.3091283 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.02810.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.028 ↗
7. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2011.217496710.1109/JPHOTOV.2011.2174967 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.11772310.1063/1.117723 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.35078210.1063/1.350782 ↗
10. 10.1002/pssa.20098284510.1002/pssa.200982845 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.296370710.1063/1.2963707 ↗
12. 10.1002/pssa.221021014010.1002/pssa.2210210140 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.143247610.1063/1.1432476 ↗
14. 10.1109/PVSC.1996.56404210.1109/PVSC.1996.564042 ↗
15. 10.1109/PVSC.2010.561425210.1109/PVSC.2010.5614252 ↗
16. Numerical modelling and optimisation of n-i-p-i-p$+$ HIT solar cells based on mc-Si, a-Si and uc-Si
17. Emitter optimization for interdigitated back contact (IBC) silicon heterojunction (Si-HJ) solar cells
18. Heterojunctions of hydrogenated amorphous silicon and monocrystalline silicon
19. 10.1063/1.346091710.1063/1.3460917 ↗
20. Reduction of optical loss in hydrogenated amorphous silicon/crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells by high-mobility hydrogen-doped In $2$O$3$ transparent conductive oxide10.1143/APEX.1.041501 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.328465010.1063/1.3284650 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.02010.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.020 ↗
23. 10.1002/pip.66810.1002/pip.668 ↗
24. 10.1515/green-2011-001810.1515/green-2011-0018 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.06910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.03.069 ↗
26. The approaches for high efficiency HIT solar cell with very thin (<100 μm) silicon wafer over 23%
27. 10.1002/1099-159X(200007/08)8:4<363::AID-PIP328>3.0.CO;2-Y10.1002/1099-159X(200007/08)8:4<363::AID-PIP328>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.16531410.1103/PhysRevB.83.165314 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.355929610.1063/1.3559296 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.310664210.1063/1.3106642 ↗
31. 10.1143/JJAP.47.81410.1143/JJAP.47.814 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.01210.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.012 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.326731610.1063/1.3267316 ↗