Influence of Ga and Ag on the KF Treatment Chemistry for CIGS Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The KF postdeposition treatment (KF-PDT) is compared on Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 (CIGS) and CuInSe 2 (CIS), as well as Ag alloyed CIGS and CIS (ACIGS and ACIS), with the focus on surface chemistry and resulting device performance. Ga does not affect the surface K content; however, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy shows a preferential reaction of F with Ga, in which CIGS+KF forms GaF 3 and CIS+KF forms InF 3 . KF-treated devices have lower Cu and Ag concentration on the surface, but Cu is reduced more strongly than Ag. Films with Ga show a greater Cu and Ag reduction on the surface than CIS or ACIS. The KF-PDT improves CIS and CIGS device performance and allows for both CIS and CIGS to tolerate reduced CdS thicknesses. In ACIS and ACIGS, device performance decreases with KF, and the open-circuit voltage and fill factor loss is reduced with thinner CdS layers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. A closer look at initial CdS growth on high-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorbers using surface-sensitive methods
2. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01538-310.1016/S0040-6090(01)01538-3 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0233510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02335 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0022-1139(03)00167-210.1016/S0022-1139(03)00167-2 ↗
5. 10.1557/PROC-348-7710.1557/PROC-348-77 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0270063110.1007/BF02700631 ↗
7. 10.1002/pip.308010.1002/pip.3080 ↗
8. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.265180210.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2651802 ↗
9. NaF/KF post-deposition treatments and their influence on the structure of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorber surfaces
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.07.01510.1016/j.solmat.2016.07.015 ↗
11. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.289996210.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2899962 ↗
12. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.275605810.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2756058 ↗
13. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.235425910.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2354259 ↗
14. 10.1016/0009-2614(77)85246-910.1016/0009-2614(77)85246-9 ↗
15. 10.1021/ja00784a01810.1021/ja00784a018 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.07.00610.1016/j.solmat.2017.07.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00068-810.1016/S0022-1139(99)00068-8 ↗
18. 10.1143/JJAP.47.893510.1143/JJAP.47.8935 ↗
19. 10.1149/06908.0217ecst10.1149/06908.0217ecst ↗
20. 10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00190-610.1016/S0169-4332(97)00190-6 ↗
21. Surface studies of laser processing of W on GaAs from WF610.1557/PROC-236-117 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.34973410.1063/1.349734 ↗
23. 10.1002/pssr.20160019910.1002/pssr.201600199 ↗
24. 10.1016/0022-3093(90)90210-D10.1016/0022-3093(90)90210-D ↗
25. 10.7567/JJAP.56.08MC0310.7567/JJAP.56.08MC03 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.36810.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.368 ↗
27. Devitrification theory and glass-forming phase diagrams of fluoride compositions
28. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.288220610.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2882206 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.02710.1016/j.solmat.2017.08.027 ↗
30. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.228047110.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2280471 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssr.20140952010.1002/pssr.201409520 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.02.02210.1016/j.solmat.2019.02.022 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmat378910.1038/nmat3789 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.43534710.1063/1.435347 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0058410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00584 ↗
36. 10.1116/1.124773510.1116/1.1247735 ↗
37. 10.7567/JJAP.56.08MC1210.7567/JJAP.56.08MC12 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.00110.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.001 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.02310.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.023 ↗
40. 10.1016/0020-1650(79)80095-110.1016/0020-1650(79)80095-1 ↗
41. 10.1002/pip.292410.1002/pip.2924 ↗