journal article·2011-10-01

qPCR as a tool to study basidiomycete colonization in wooden field stakes

Annica Pilgård, Gry Alfredsen, Charlotte G. Björdal, Carl Gunnar Fossdal, Isabella Børja

hfsg· Volume 65· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Molecular methods are emerging also as useful tools for wood protection studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as a tool for investigating details of the colonization pattern of basidiomycete decay fungi in wood samples after 6 years of soil exposure. Samples of Pinus sylvestris L. (heartwood without treatment), furfurylated P. sylvestris sapwood and Cu-HDO treated P. sylvestris sapwood was in focus. The qPCR method based on basidiomycete DNA content in the wood had the highest sensitivity, while the ergosterol assay was more sensitive than the chitin assay. Visual rating was compared with laboratory analyses and was found to be correlating well with qPCR. This study demonstrates that qPCR in combination with microscopy provides relevant data about basidiomycete colonization in wooden material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases · Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies · Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Brinellgatan 4, 501 15 Borås, Sweden

Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, PO Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Drottning Kristinas Väg 67, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1139/m92-17310.1139/m92-173 ↗
2. 10.1515/hfsg.1981.35.1.1010.1515/hfsg.1981.35.1.10 ↗
3. 10.1094/Phyto-64-33510.1094/Phyto-64-335 ↗
4. 10.4319/lom.2005.3.38110.4319/lom.2005.3.381 ↗
5. 10.1515/HF.2005.09310.1515/HF.2005.093 ↗
6. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00891.x10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00891.x ↗
7. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.200510.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.2005 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x ↗
9. 10.1007/s10086-008-1011-310.1007/s10086-008-1011-3 ↗
10. 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4725-4734.200010.1128/AEM.66.11.4725-4734.2000 ↗
11. 10.1515/HF.2005.07610.1515/HF.2005.076 ↗
12. 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90469-410.1016/0022-2836(71)90469-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81333-610.1016/S0953-7562(09)81333-6 ↗
14. Mullis K.B. · Methods Enzymol. · 1987 · 155 · 1
15. Nilsson K. · Mater. Org. · 1990 · 25 · 275
16. 10.1139/cjm-44-6-57510.1139/cjm-44-6-575 ↗
17. Pasanen A.-L. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 1999 · 65 · 13810.1128/AEM.65.1.138-142.1999 ↗
18. 10.1515/HF.2010.07410.1515/HF.2010.074 ↗
19. Prewitt L.M. · Forest Prod. J. · 2008 · 58 · 66
20. 10.1515/HF.2005.11110.1515/HF.2005.111 ↗
21. 10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.3.22910.1515/hfsg.1998.52.3.229 ↗
22. 10.1515/HF.2010.07110.1515/HF.2010.071 ↗
23. 10.1021/bk-1977-0043.ch00910.1021/bk-1977-0043.ch009 ↗
24. Vilgalys R. · J. Bacteriol. · 1990 · 172 · 423810.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 ↗