High-speed camera study of Stage III crack propagation in chemically strengthened glass
Source abstract
Abstract
Thermally or chemically strengthened glass is more resistant to damage and breakage compared to non-strengthened glass. Both strengthening mechanisms are based on incorporation of a compressive stress profile in the surface of the glass, which must be balanced by an equivalent amount of integrated tensile stress in the interior of the glass. This tensile stress is believed to affect the kinetics of Stage III crack propagation upon fracture of the sample. In this study, we use a high-speed camera to perform direct measurement of the kinetics of Stage III fracture in a strengthened glass sample. Data including crack propagation speed, crack bifurcation distance, and bifurcation angles are collected at a rate of 500,000 frames per second and then characterized. The authors believe that these data will provide a foundation for understanding the physics of Stage III fracture in strengthened glass samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Glass properties and applications · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. L. Wondraczek, J.C. Mauro, J. Eckert, U. Kühn, J. Horbach, J. Deubener, T. Rouxel, Adv. Mater. 23, 4578 (2011)10.1002/adma.201102795 ↗
2. A. Tandia, K.D. Vargheese, J.C. Mauro, A.K. Varshneya, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 358, 316 (2012)10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.09.034 ↗
3. A. Tandia, K.D. Vargheese, J.C. Mauro, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 358, 1569 (2012)10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.04.021 ↗
4. S.S. Kistler, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45, 59 (1962)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11081.x ↗
5. P. Acloque, J. Tochon, “Measurement of Mechanical Resistance of Glass after Reinforcement,” in colloquium on mechanical strength of glass and ways of improving it, 25–29 September 1961, Florence, Italy (Union Scientifique Continentale du Verre, Charlori, Belgium, 1962), pp. 687–704
6. ECE regulation R43, Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, Equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions, p. 46
7. G.T. Embley, G.C. Sih, Eng. Fract. Mech. 4, 431 (1972)10.1016/0013-7944(72)90055-0 ↗
8. S.M. Wiederhorn, A. Dretzke, J. Rödel, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85, 2287 (2002)10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00449.x ↗
9. K.-T. Wan, S. Lathabai, B.R. Lawn, J. Euro, Ceram. Soc. 6, 259 (1990)10.1016/0955-2219(90)90053-I ↗
10. S.T. Gulati, Trans. Ind. Ceram. Soc. 64, 117 (2005)10.1080/0371750X.2005.11012200 ↗
11. R.F. Cook, E.G. Liniger, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1096 (1993)10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03726.x ↗
12. L.I. Slepyan, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41, 1019 (1993)10.1016/0022-5096(93)90053-I ↗
13. B.N.J. Persson, E.A. Brener, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036123 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036123 ↗
14. L. Ponson, D. Bonamy, Int. J. Fract. 162, 21 (2010)10.1007/s10704-010-9481-x ↗
15. L.B. Freund, Dynamic fracture mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1990)10.1017/CBO9780511546761 ↗
16. M.F. Kanninen, C. Popelar, Advanced fracture mechanics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1985)
17. E. Bouchbinder, J. Fineberg, M. Marder, Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 371 (2010)10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104019 ↗
18. Y.M. Tsai, Eng. Fract. Mech. 6, 509 (1974)10.1016/0013-7944(74)90008-3 ↗
19. S. Aoki, M. Sakata, Eng. Fract. Mech. 13, 491 (1980)10.1016/0013-7944(80)90080-6 ↗
20. Z.F. Song, G.C. Sih, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 38, 121 (2002)10.1016/S0167-8442(02)00090-3 ↗
21. A. Karma, A.E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 245510 (2004)10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245510 ↗
22. G.D. Quinn, Fractography of ceramics and glasses, NIST, Spec. Publ. 960-17, Washington, 2006
23. E. Bouyne, O. Gaume, Fragmentation of thin chemically tempered glass plates. Glass Technol. 43C, 300–302 (2002)
24. Z. Tang, M.B. Abrams, J.C. Mauro, N. Venkataraman, T.E. Meyer, J.M. Jacobs, X. Wu, and A.J. Ellison, Automated apparatus for measuring the frangibility and fragmentation of strengthened glass, Exp. Mech. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11340-014-9855-510.1007/s11340-014-9855-5 ↗
25. K. Ravi-Chandar, W.G. Knauss, An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: II. Microstruct Asp. Int. J. Fract. 26, 65–80 (1984)10.1007/BF01152313 ↗
26. J.E. Field, Brittle fracture: its study and application. Contemp. Phys. 12(1), 1–31 (1971)10.1080/00107517108205103 ↗
27. W. Doll, Investigations of the crack branching energy. Int. J. Fract. 11, 184–186 (1975)10.1007/BF00034729 ↗
28. F. Kerkhoff, in Dynamic crack propagation, ed. by G.C. Sih, (Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, 1973), pp. 3–35
29. M. Ramulu, A.S. Kobayashi, Mechanics of crack curving and branching––a dynamic fracture analysis, dynamic fracture, 1985, pp. 61–7510.1007/978-94-009-5123-5_5 ↗
30. F.P. Bowden, J.H. Brunton, J.E. Field, A.D. Heyes, Controlled fracture of brittle solids and interruption of electrical current. Nature 216, 38–42 (1967)10.1038/216038a0 ↗