journal article·2007-03-13

Symmetric and antisymmetric modes of electromagnetic resonators

Y. Liu, N. Fang, D. Wu, C. Sun, X. Zhang

Applied Physics A· Volume 87· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, we numerically study a new type of infrared resonator structure, whose unit cell consists of paired split-ring resonators (SRRs). At different resonant frequencies, the magnetic dipoles induced from the two SRRs within one unit cell can be parallel or antiparallel, which are defined as symmetric and antisymmetic modes, respectively. Detailed simulation indicates that the symmetric mode is due to magnetic coupling to resonators, in which the effective permeability could be negative. However, the antisymmetric mode originating from strong electric coupling may contribute to negative effective permittivity. Our new electromagnetic resonators with pronounced magnetic as well as electric responses could provide a new pathway to design negative index materials (NIMs) in the optical region.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. V.G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 10, 509 (1968)10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699 ↗
2. R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, Science 292, 77 (2001)10.1126/science.1058847 ↗
3. D.R. Smith, W.J. Padilla, D.C. Vier, S.C. Nemat-Nasser, S. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
4. T.J. Yen, W.J. Padilla, N. Fang, D.C. Vier, D.R. Smith, J.B. Pendry, D.N. Basov, X. Zhang, Science 303, 1494 (2004)10.1126/science.1094025 ↗
5. C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, S. Linden, S. Burger, L. Zschiedrich, F. Schmidt, J.F. Zhou, T. Koschny, C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 203901 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.203901 ↗
6. J.B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
7. N. Fang, H. Lee, C. Sun, X. Zhang, Science 308, 5721 (2005)10.1126/science.1108759 ↗
8. J.B. Pendry, A.J. Holden, D.J. Robbins, W.J. Stewart, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 47, 2075 (1999)10.1109/22.798002 ↗
9. G. Dolling, C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, J.F. Zhou, C.M. Soukoulis, S. Linden, Opt. Lett. 30, 3198 (2005)10.1364/OL.30.003198 ↗
10. A.N. Grigorenko, A.K. Geim, H.F. Gleeson, Y. Zhang, A.A. Firsov, I.Y. Khrushchev, J. Petrovic, Nature 438, 335 (2005)10.1038/nature04242 ↗
11. P. Nordlander, C. Oubre, E. Prodan, K. Li, M.I. Stockman, Nano Lett. 4, 899 (2004)10.1021/nl049681c ↗
12. D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, P. Markos, C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. B 65, 195104 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195104 ↗
13. T. Koschny, P. Markos, E.N. Economou, D.R. Smith, D.C. Vier, C.M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. B 71, 245105 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevB.71.245105 ↗
14. D. Schurig, J.J. Mock, D.R. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 041109 (2006)10.1063/1.2166681 ↗