journal article·2007-04-23

Zn-doping effect on the energy barrier to magnetization reversal in superparamagnetic nickel ferrite nanoparticles

J.T. Elizalde Galindo, A.H. Adair, C.E. Botez, V. Corral Flores, D. Bueno Baques, L. Fuentes Cobas, J.A. Matutes-Aquino

Applied Physics A· Volume 87· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Measurements of ac-susceptibility and dc-magnetization were carried out on samples of Ni1-xZnxFe2O4 nanoparticles (x=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75) with average diameters 〈D〉≈7 nm. Values of the superparamagnetic blocking temperature TB were obtained from the characteristic temperature behavior of the imaginary susceptibility χimag. An Arrhenius-type law, which accurately describes the relationship between the observation time τobs and the blocking temperature, was used to determine the effective energy barrier to magnetization reversal Ueff. A Zn-content dependence of the energy barrier is observed, where Ueff changes little for 0≤x≤0.25, it peaks at x=0.5, and decreases back upon further Zn-doping. The large increase of Ueff at x=0.5 is attributed to an enhanced magnetic anisotropy induced by the crossover between two spatial arrangements of spins in the A and B sub-lattices of the ferrimagnetic inverse spinel.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. L. Néel, Ann. Geophys. (C.N.R.S.) 5, 99 (1949)
2. F. Luis, E. del Barco, J.M. Hernandez, E. Remiro, J. Bartolome, J. Tejada, Phys. Rev. B 59, 11837 (1999)10.1103/PhysRevB.59.11837 ↗
3. T. Tsutaoka, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 2789 (2003)10.1063/1.1542651 ↗
4. R.E. Rosenweig, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 252, 370 (2002)10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0 ↗
5. R.D. Zysler, D. Fiorani, A.M. Testa, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 224, 5 (2001)10.1016/S0304-8853(00)01328-7 ↗
6. Y.D. Zhang, J.I. Budnick, W.A. Hines, C.L. Chen, J.Q. Xiao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2053 (1998)10.1063/1.121262 ↗
7. W. Luo, S.R. Nagel, T.F. Rosenbaum, R.E. Rosenweig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2721 (1991)10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2721 ↗
8. M. Hanson, C. Johansson, S. Mørup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 735 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.735 ↗
9. F. Luis, F. Petroff, J. Bartolomé, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 5109 (2004)
10. E.W. Gorter, Nature 165, 798 (1950)10.1038/165798a0 ↗
11. A.P. Hammersley, S.O. Svenson, M. Hanfland, A.N. Fitch, D. Hauserman, High Press. Res. 14, 235 (1996)10.1080/08957959608201408 ↗
12. B.D. Culity, Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1978), pp. 101–102
13. E.W. Gorter, Philips Res. Rep. 9, 295 (1954)
14. S.A. Morrison, C.L. Cahill, E.E. Carpenter, S. Calvin, R. Swaminathan, M.E. McHenry, V.G. Harris, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6392 (2004)10.1063/1.1715132 ↗
15. N. Ponpandian, A. Narayansamy, C.N. Chinnasamy, N. Sivakumar, J.M. Greneche, K. Chattopadhyay, K. Shinoda, B. Jeyadevan, K. Tohji, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 192510 (2005)10.1063/1.1925755 ↗
16. Y. Ichiyanagi, T. Uehashi, S. Yamada, Phys. Stat. Solidi 1, 3485 (2004)