Electrical characteristics of Ta2O5 based capacitors with different gate electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Al, W and TiN gate stacks using reactively sputtered thin (15–35 nm) Ta2O5 as a high-k dielectric have been investigated. It has been established that the type and the deposition technique of the gate electrode strongly affect the parameters of the structures. RF sputtered tungsten has been established as the most suitable electrode material (giving a nonreactive contact) providing a low leakage current (∼10-8 A/cm2 at 1 MV/cm) through capacitors and a high dielectric constant. The application of Al gate electrodes in the advanced DRAM devices is impeded by the chemical interaction of Al with the Ta2O5 films deteriorating the performance of the structures. The radiation-induced defects during the TiN deposition increase the leakage currents for TiN/Ta2O5/Si capacitors. A modified Poole–Frenkel conduction mechanism with a tendency for a reduction of the compensation level with increasing Ta2O5 thickness was found for W-gate capacitors. Schottky emission at low applied fields and modified Poole–Frenkel mechanism at high fields define the J–V characteristics of Al capacitors. The current through TiN capacitors is governed by ohmic and space charge limited conduction. The post metallization annealing in H2 reduces the oxide charge but deteriorates both the breakdown fields and the leakage currents for all capacitors studied. The effect is stronger for Al and TiN structures and is accompanied by a reduction of the dielectric constant.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. The Intern. Techn. Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) 2003 edn., http://public.itrs.net
2. C.H. Liu, S.J. Chang, J.F. Chen, S.C. Chen, J.S. Lee, U.H. Liaw: Mater. Sci. Eng. B 106, 234 (2003)10.1016/j.mseb.2003.09.030 ↗
3. G. Wilk, R. Wallace, J. Anthony: J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5243 (2001) (and references there in)10.1063/1.1361065 ↗
4. E. Atanassova, T. Dimitrova: In: Hand book of surface and interfaces of materials ed. H.S. Nalwa (Acad.Press. San Diego 2001) vol. 4, 43910.1016/B978-012513910-6/50055-4 ↗
5. S. Guha, E. Gusev, M. Copel, L.A. Ragnarsson, D.A. Buchanan: MRS Bull. 27, 226 (2002)10.1557/mrs2002.76 ↗
6. S. Blonkowski, M. Regache, A. Halimaoul: J. Appl. Phys. 90, 1501 (2001)10.1063/1.1381043 ↗
7. T. Remmel, R. Ramprasad, J. Walls: ‘Leakage Behavior and Reliability Assessments of Tantalum Oxide Dielectric MIM Capacitors’, In: Proc. 41st Annual Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp. Dallas, USA, 30 March – 4 April 2003, p27710.1109/RELPHY.2003.1197757 ↗
8. R.M. Fleming, D.V. Lang, C.D.W. Jones, M.L. Steigerwald, D.W. Murphy, G.B. Alers, Y.-H. Wong, R.B. van Dover, J.R. Kwo, A.M. Sergent: J. Appl. Phys. 88, 850 (2000)10.1063/1.373747 ↗
9. E. Atanassova, N. Novkovski, A. Paskaleva, M. Pecovska-Gjorgievich: Solid State Electron. 46, 1887 (2002)10.1016/S0038-1101(02)00134-X ↗
10. R. Ramprasad, M. Sadd, D. Roberts, T. Remmel, M. Raymond, E. Luckowski, S. Kalpat, C. Barron, M. Miller: Microelectron. Eng. 69, 190 (2003)10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00296-X ↗
11. D.A. Buchanan, F.R. McFeely, J.J. Yurkas: Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 12 (1998)10.1063/1.122242 ↗
12. C. Chaneliere, J.L. Autran, R.A.B. Devine: J. Appl. Phys. 86, 480 (1999)10.1063/1.370756 ↗
13. W. Zeng, E. Eisenbrawn, M. Frisch, J.J. Sullivan, A.E. Kaloyeros, J. Margalit, K. Beek: J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, F172 (2004)10.1149/1.1766312 ↗
14. J.P. Chang, M.L. Steigerwald, R.M. Fleming, R.L. Opila, G.B. Alers: Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3705 (1999)10.1063/1.123227 ↗
15. J.W. Lee, Ch.H. Han, J.-S. Park. J.W. Park: J. Electroc. Soc. 148, 3705 (2001)
16. H-J Lee, R. Sinclair, M-B Lee, H-D Lee: J. Appl. Phys. 83, 139 (1998)10.1063/1.366732 ↗
17. R.A.B. Devine, L. Vallier, J.L. Autran: Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1775 (1996)10.1063/1.116663 ↗
18. C. Chaneliere, J. Autran, R. Devine, B. Balland: Material Science and Engineering R22, 269 (1998)10.1016/S0927-796X(97)00023-5 ↗
19. C.C. Chen, H.C. Lin, C.-Y. Chang, T.-S. Chao, S.C. Hung, W.-F. Wu, T.-Y. Huang, M.-S. Liang: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4733 (2000)10.1143/JJAP.39.4733 ↗
20. B. Maiti, P.J. Tobin, C. Hobbs, R.I. Hegde, F. Huang, D.L. O’Meara, D. Jovanovic, M. Mendicino, J. Chen, D. Connelly, O. Adetutu, J. Mogab, J. Candelaria, L.B. La: IEDM Tech. Dig. 781 (1998)
21. H.-J. Lee, R. Sinclair, M.-B. Lee, H.-D. Lee: J. Appl. Phys. 83, 139 (1998)10.1063/1.366732 ↗
22. K. Chen, G.R. Yang, M. Nielsen, T.M. Lu: Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 399 (1997)10.1063/1.118386 ↗
23. R. Li, Q. Xu, S. Member: IEEE Transaction on electron devices 49, 1891 (2002)10.1109/TED.2002.804707 ↗
24. H. Yang, G.A. Brown, J.C. Hu, J.P. Lu, R. Kraft, A.L.P. Rotondaro, S.V. Hattangady, I.-C. Chen, J.D. Luttmer, R.A. Chapman, P.J. Chen, H.L. Tsai, B. Amirhekmat, L.K. Magel: IEDM 97, 459 (1997)
25. K. Chu, J. P Chang, M.L. Steigerwald, R.M. Fleming, R.L. Opila, D.V. Lang, R.B. van Dover, C.D.W. Jones: J. Appl. Phys. 91, 306 (2002)
26. J.G. Simmons: Phys. Rev. 155, 667 (1967)10.1103/PhysRev.155.657 ↗