Preparation of kerosene-based ferrofluid and analysis of its stability using oleic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Proteins in Food Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. W. Huang, X. Wang, Ferrofluids lubrication: A status report. Lubr. Sci. 28, 3–26 (2016)10.1002/ls.1291 ↗
2. V. Socoliuc et al., Ferrofluids and bio-ferrofluids: looking back and stepping forward. Nanoscale 14, 4786–4886 (2022)10.1039/D1NR05841J ↗
3. Y. Hadadian et al., From low to high saturation magnetization in magnetite nanoparticles: the crucial role of the molar ratios between the chemicals. ACS Omega 7, 15996–16012 (2022)10.1021/acsomega.2c01136 ↗
4. M. Latikka, M. Backholm, J.V. Timonen, R.H. Ras, Wetting of ferrofluids: Phenomena and control. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 36, 118–129 (2018)10.1016/j.cocis.2018.04.003 ↗
5. Dadfar, S. M. et al. Size-isolation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles improves MRI, MPI and hyperthermia performance. J. Nanobiotechnol. 18, 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-020-0580-110.1186/s12951-020-0580-1 ↗
6. M.S. Ebaid, A.M. Ghrair, M. Al-busoul, Investigation of heat transfer enhancement using ferro-nanofluids (Fe3O4/water) in a heated pipe under the application of magnetic field. Adv. Mech. Eng. 14, 1–17 (2022)10.1177/16878132221102647 ↗
7. L. Phor, V. Kumar, Self-cooling by ferrofluid in magnetic field. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1738-z10.1007/s42452-019-1738-z ↗
8. S. Chen, D. Li, Control of Magnetic Particle Size in Ferrofluid and Its Effect on Rheological Properties. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. (English Edition) 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00718-z10.1186/s10033-022-00718-z ↗
9. I. Porobic, A. Gontean, Electromagnetic energy harvester. SIITME 2019–2019 IEEE 25th International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging, (Proceedings 2019), pp. 151–15410.1109/SIITME47687.2019.8990730 ↗
10. A.M. Van Silfhout, H. Engelkamp, B.H. Erné, Colloidal Stability of Aqueous Ferrofluids at 10 T. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 5908–5912 (2020)10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01804 ↗
11. K. Duraisamy, et al. Single domain soft ferromagnetic ferrofluid suitable for intratumoural magnetic hyperthermia. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 684, 133049 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13304910.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.133049 ↗
12. H. Fatima, T. Charinpanitkul, K.S. Kim, Fundamentals to apply magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia therapy. Nanomaterials 11, 1–20 (2021)10.3390/nano11051203 ↗
13. A. Kulandaivel, et al. Advances in Ferrofluid-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators: Design, Performance, and Prospects for Energy Harvesting Applications. Nano Energy 109110 (2023). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221128552300947310.1016/j.nanoen.2023.109110 ↗
14. M. Salvador, et al. Microemulsion synthesis of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for bioapplications. (2021)10.3390/ijms22010427 ↗
15. D. Makovec, A. Košak, A. Žnidaršič, M. Drofenik, The synthesis of spinel-ferrite nanoparticles using precipitation in microemulsions for ferrofluid applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 289, 32–35 (2005)10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.010 ↗
16. E.A. Bakr, M.N. El-Nahass, W.M. Hamada, T.A. Fayed, Facile synthesis of superparamagnetic Fe3O4@noble metal core-shell nanoparticles by thermal decomposition and hydrothermal methods: Comparative study and catalytic applications. RSC Adv. 11, 781–797 (2020)10.1039/D0RA08230A ↗
17. A. Setiawan, et al. Magnetically separable and reusable Fe3O4/rGO photocatalyst synthesized through green approach for heavy metal ion reduction application. Diamond Relat. Mater. 151, 111779 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2024.11177910.1016/j.diamond.2024.111779 ↗
18. D. Jara, L.S. Veiga, O. Garate, G. Ybarra, P. Tancredi, Mass-production of water-based ferrofluids capable of developing spike-like structures. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 572, 170622 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17062210.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170622 ↗
19. M. Rajnak, et al. Vibration energy harvesting by ferrofluids in external magnetic fields 1–15 (2025)10.1038/s41598-025-12490-w ↗
20. O. Oehlsen, S.I. Cervantes-Ramírez, P. Cervantes-Avilés, I.A. Medina-Velo, Approaches on ferrofluid synthesis and applications: current status and future perspectives. ACS Omega 7, 3134–3150 (2022)10.1021/acsomega.1c05631 ↗
21. R. González-Martín, A. Gutiérrez-Serpa, V. Pino, The use of ferrofluids in analytical sample preparation: A review. Separations 8, 1–14 (2021)10.3390/separations8040047 ↗
22. L. Jin, J. Yang, Q. Li, X. Tian, Experimental Study on Thermal Conductivity of Hybrid Magnetic Fluids Under External Magnetic Field. Magnetichemistry (2025)10.3390/magnetochemistry11040030 ↗
23. V. Botvin, et al. Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles modified by citric and oleic acids on the physicochemical and magnetic properties of hybrid electrospun P(VDF-TrFE) scaffolds. Polymers 15 (2023)10.3390/polym15143135 ↗
24. G. Zang, Z. Zhang, W. Yu, D. Wang, D. Li, Effects of different fatty acids as surfactants on the rheological properties of kerosene-based magnetic fluids. Frontiers in Materials 9, 1–12 (2022)10.3389/fmats.2022.930633 ↗
25. R. E. Saputro, A. Taufiq, Sunaryono, N. Hidayat, A. Hidayat, Effects of DMSO content on the optical properties, liquid stability, and antimicrobial activity of Fe3O4/OA/DMSO Ferrofluids. Nano 15, 1–10 (2020)10.1142/S1793292020500678 ↗
26. J. Lei, Z. Luo, S. Qing, X. Huang, F. Li, Effect of surfactants on the stability, rheological properties, and thermal conductivity of Fe3O4 nanofluids. Powder Technol. 399, 117197 (2022). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003259102200091210.1016/j.powtec.2022.117197 ↗
27. B.H. Toby, A simple solution to the Rietveld refinement recipe problem. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 57, 175–180 (2024)10.1107/S1600576723011032 ↗
28. M.M. Ba-Abbad, A. Benamour, D. Ewis, A.W. Mohammad, E. Mahmoudi, Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with different shapes through a co-precipitation method and their application. JOM 74, 3531–3539 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05380-310.1007/s11837-022-05380-3 ↗
29. U. T. Santoso, Abdullah, D. R. Mujiyanti, D. Ariyani, J. Waskito, Room temperature synthesis of magnetite particles by an oil membrane layer-assisted reverse co-precipitation approach. Adv. Mater. Res. 1162, 41–46 (2021)10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1162.41 ↗
30. R.A. Harris, Phase transformation of magnetite and goethite nanoparticles controlled by pH: Experimental and simulation study of cuboid magnetic nanoparticles prepared with NaOH. Solid State Sci. 148, 107416 (2024). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S129325582300308410.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2023.107416 ↗
31. X. Liang, H. Shi, X. Jia, Y. Yang, X. Liu, Dispersibility, shape and magnetic properties of Nano-Fe3O4 particles. Mater. Sci. Appl. 02, 1644–1653 (2011)
32. B. H. Hui, M. N. Salimi, production of iron oxide nanoparticles by co-precipitation method with optimization studies of processing temperature, ph and stirring rate. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 743 (2020)10.1088/1757-899X/743/1/012036 ↗
33. A. Fadli, et al. Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles via co-precipitation method. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 622 (2019)10.1088/1757-899X/622/1/012013 ↗
34. H.R. Dehghanpour, pH, molar ratio of ferrous to ferric ions and surfactant presence effects on physical properties of iron oxide nanoparticles generated by co-precipitation method. J. Coord. Chem. 73, 3452–3464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00958972.2020.184963910.1080/00958972.2020.1849639 ↗
35. Z. Jia, J. Li, L. Gao, D. Yang, A. Kanaev, Dynamic Light Scattering: A Powerful Tool for In Situ Nanoparticle Sizing. Colloids Interf. 7 (2023)10.3390/colloids7010015 ↗
36. P. Carneiro et al., Electromagnetic energy harvesting using magnetic levitation architectures: A review. Appl. Energy 260, 114191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11419110.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114191 ↗
37. C.M. Maguire, M. Rösslein, P. Wick, A. Prina-Mello, Characterisation of particles in solution-a perspective on light scattering and comparative technologies. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 19, 732–745 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2018.151758710.1080/14686996.2018.1517587 ↗
38. J. Shojaeiarani, D. Bajwa, G. Holt, Sonication amplitude and processing time influence the cellulose nanocrystals morphology and dispersion. Nanocomposites 6, 41–46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2019.171097410.1080/20550324.2019.1710974 ↗
39. P. R. S. Baabu, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles: a review on the province of its compounds, properties and biological applications. Materials 16 (2023)10.3390/ma16010059 ↗
40. F.J. Espinosa-Faller et al., Magnetic properties of nano(iron oxide)-decorated graphene oxide. Mater. Chem. Phys. 317, 129173 (2024). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S025405842400298010.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129173 ↗
41. F.V. Gutierrez et al., The effect of temperature on the synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles by the coprecipitation method. Heliyon 10, 1–11 (2024)10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25781 ↗
42. G.R. Pattanaik, D.K. Pandya, S.C. Kashyap, Giant magnetoresistance and magnetic properties of electrodeposited Cu-Co granular films. J. Alloy. Compd. 326, 260–264 (2001)10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01314-7 ↗
43. L. Kumar, P. Kumar, M. Kar, Cation distribution by Rietveld technique and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of Zn substituted nanocrystalline cobalt ferrite. J. Alloy. Compd. 551, 72–81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.00910.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.009 ↗
44. M. Yusefi, K. Shameli, O.S. Yee, S.Y. Teow, Z. Hedayatnasab, H. Jahangirian, T.J. Webster, K. Kuča, Green synthesis of fe3o4 nanoparticles stabilized by a garcinia mangostana fruit peel extract for hyperthermia and anticancer activities. Int. J. Nanomed. 16, 2515–2532 (2021)10.2147/IJN.S284134 ↗
45. L. Huang, et al. The contribution of long-terms static interactions between minerals and flotation reagents for the separation of fluorite and calcite. Minerals 9 (2019)10.3390/min9110699 ↗
46. J. Mosafer, K. Abnous, M. Tafaghodi, H. Jafarzadeh, M. Ramezani, Preparation and characterization of uniform-sized PLGA nanospheres encapsulated with oleic acid-coated magnetic-Fe3O4 nanoparticles for simultaneous diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 514, 146–154 (2017). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092777571631010X10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.11.056 ↗
47. K. Bootdee, B. P. Grady, M. Nithitanakul, Magnetite / poly ( D, L-lactide-co-glycolide ) and hydroxyapatite / poly ( D, L-lactide-co-glycolide ) prepared by w / o / w emulsion technique for drug carrier : physical characteristic of composite nanoparticles 2031–2040 (2017)10.1007/s00396-017-4185-7 ↗
48. L. Zhang, R. He, H.C. Gu, Oleic acid coating on the monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 2611–2617 (2006)10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.023 ↗
49. W. Cheng, et al. Preparation of boronic acid-functionalized magnetic nano-particles by polarity-regulating molecular self-assembly. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 585 (2019)10.1088/1757-899X/585/1/012055 ↗
50. M.J. Chen, H. Shen, X. Li, J. Ruan, W.Q. Yuan, Magnetic fluids’ stability improved by oleic acid bilayer-coated structure via one-pot synthesis. Chem. Pap. 70, 1642–1648 (2016)10.1515/chempap-2016-0096 ↗
51. S. Askari, R. Lotfi, A.M. Rashidi, H. Koolivand, M. Koolivand-Salooki, Rheological and thermophysical properties of ultra-stable kerosene-based Fe3O4/Graphene nanofluids for energy conservation. Energy Convers. Manage. 128, 134–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.03710.1016/j.enconman.2016.09.037 ↗
52. R. Rosensweig, Ferrohydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985)