Effect of specimen configuration and orthotropy on the Young’s modulus of solid wood obtained from a longitudinal vibration test
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Young’s modulus in the longitudinal direction was measured by a longitudinal vibration (LV) test on western hemlock specimens with various length/width ratios. The effects of the configuration and orthotropy of the specimen on the measurement of Young’s modulus was investigated through subsequent finite element (FE) calculations. The experimental results suggested that Young’s modulus could not be obtained accurately when the length/width ratio of the specimen was in a certain range. The FE calculations revealed that Young’s modulus in the transverse direction and Poisson’s ratio in the length-width plane, as well as the length/width ratio, affected the Young’s modulus value. However, the results showed that when the length/width ratio of the specimen was larger than 10, Young’s modulus could be measured accurately with the LV test with a reduction in the effect of orthotropy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Material Properties and Processing · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University , Nishikawazu-cho 1060 , Matsue , Shimane , 690-8504 , Japan
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Ando, K., Mizutani, M., Taniguchi, Y., and Yamamoto, H. (2013). Time dependence of Poisson’s effect in wood III: asymmetry of three-dimensional viscoelastic compliance matrix of Japanese cypress. J. Wood Sci. 59: 290–298, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-013-1333-7.10.1007/s10086-013-1333-7 ↗
2. Baar, J., Tippner, J., and Gryc, V. (2012). The influence of wood density on longitudinal wave velocity determined by the ultrasound method in comparison to the resonance longitudinal method. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 70: 767–769, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-011-0550-2.10.1007/s00107-011-0550-2 ↗
3. Brancheriau, L. and Bailleres, H. (2002). Natural vibration analysis of clear wooden beams: a theoretical review. Wood Sci. Technol. 36: 347–365, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-002-0143-7.10.1007/s00226-002-0143-7 ↗
4. Brancheriau, L. and Baillères, H. (2003). Use of the partial least squares method with acoustic vibration spectra as a new grading technique for structural timber. Holzforschung 57: 644–652, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2003.097.10.1515/HF.2003.097 ↗
5. Cao, Y., Li, M. Wang, Z., Wang, Y., and Gao, Z. (2019). Dynamic testing and analysis of Poisson’s ratio of lumber based on the cantilever-plate bending mode shape method. J. Test. Eval. 47: 2540–2550, https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20160521.10.1520/JTE20160521 ↗
6. Chauhan, S. and Sethy, A. (2016). Differences in dynamic modulus of elasticity determined by three vibration methods and their relationship with static modulus of elasticity. Mader. Cien. Tecn. 18: 373–382, https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-221x2016005000034.10.4067/S0718-221X2016005000034 ↗
7. Epimeier, H., Johansson, M., Kliger, R., and Westin, M. (2007). Material properties and their interrelation in chemically modified clear wood of scots pine. Holzforschung 61: 34–42, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2007.007.10.1515/HF.2007.007 ↗
8. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan ed. (1982). Wood industry handbook. Maruzen, Tokyo.
9. Guitard, D. (1987). Mécanique du matériau bois et composites. Editions Cépadués, Toulouse.
10. Haines, D.W., Leban, J.M., and Herbé, C. (1996). Determination of Young’s modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisons to static flexure and other dynamic method. Wood Sci. Technol. 30: 253–263, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00229348.10.1007/BF00229348 ↗
11. Hassan, K.T.S., Horáček, P., and Tipnner, J. (2013). Evaluation of stiffness and strength of scots pine wood using resonance frequency and ultrasonic techniques. Bio. Res. 8: 1634–1645, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.2.1634-1645.10.15376/biores.8.2.1634-1645 ↗
12. Hearmon, R.F.S. (1948). The elasticity of wood and plywood. Department of Science and Industry Research, Forest Products Research Special Rep7. HMSO, London.
13. Hearmon, R.F.S. (1966). Vibration testing of wood. Forest Prod. J. 16: 29–40.
14. Ilic, J. (2003). Dynamic MOE of 55 species using small wood beams. Holz Roh- Werkst. 61: 167–172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-003-0367-8.10.1007/s00107-003-0367-8 ↗
15. Kollmann, F.F.P. and Côté, W.A. (1968). Principles of wood science and technology: I solid wood. Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-87928-9 ↗
16. Kubojima, Y., Yoshihara, H., Ohta, M., and Okano, T. (1997). Accuracy of the shear modulus of wood obtained by the Timoshenko’s theory of bending. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 43: 439–443.
17. Matsumoto, T. (1962). Studies on the dynamic modulus E and the logarithmic decrement of wood by transverse vibration. Bull. Kyushu Univ. Forest 36: 1–86.
18. Sawada, M. (1983). Deformation behavior of wood. J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Jpn. 32: 838–847, https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.32.838.10.2472/jsms.32.838 ↗
19. Sobue, N. (1986). Measurement of Young’s modulus by the transient longitudinal vibration of wooden beams using a fast Fourier transformation spectrum analyzer. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 32: 744–747.
20. Timoshenko, S.P. (1921). On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. Phil. Mag. 41: 744–746, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442108636264.10.1080/14786442108636264 ↗
21. Tonosaki, M., Okano, T., and Asano, I. (1983). Vibration properties of Sitka spruce with longitudinal vibration and flexural vibration. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 29: 547–552.
22. Wang, S.Y. and Chuang, S.T. (2000). Experimental data correction of the dynamic elastic moduli, velocity and density of solid wood as a function of moisture content above the fiber saturation point. Holzforschung 54: 309–314, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2000.052.10.1515/HF.2000.052 ↗
23. Yadama, V., Davalos, J.F., Loferski, J.R., and Holzer, S.M. (1991). Selecting a gauge length to measure parallel-to-grain strain in Southern pine. Forest Prod. J. 41: 65–68.
24. Yang, Y., Amano, T., Ishimaru, Y., and Iida, I. (2003). Application of modal analysis by transfer function to nondestructive testing of wood II: modulus of elasticity evaluation of sections of differing quality in a wooden beam by the curvature of the flexural vibration wave. J. Wood Sci. 49: 140–144, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100860300022.10.1007/s100860300022 ↗
25. Yoshihara, H. (2012a). Influence of specimen configuration on the measurement of the off-axis Young’s modulus of wood by vibration tests. Holzforschung 66: 485–492, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2011.182.10.1515/hf.2011.182 ↗
26. Yoshihara, H. (2012b). Examination of the specimen configuration and analysis method in the flexural and longitudinal vibration tests of solid wood and wood-based materials. Forest Prod. J. 62: 191–200, https://doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473-62.3.191.10.13073/0015-7473-62.3.191 ↗
27. Yoshihara, H. and Maruta, M. (2019). Young’s modulus and shear modulus of open-hole spruce measured by vibration tests. Wood Sci. Technol. 53: 1279–1294, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-019-01130-y.10.1007/s00226-019-01130-y ↗
28. Yoshihara, H. and Yoshinobu, M. (2015). Young’s modulus and shear modulus of solid wood measured by the flexural vibration test of the specimens with large height/length ratios. Holzforschung 69: 493–499, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2014-0151.10.1515/hf-2014-0151 ↗