journal article·2022-12Open access

Comparison of laser micro-inscribed pillars on flat versus tilted substrates

Damon G. K. Aboud, Andreas Gruner, Anne-Marie Kietzig

Applied Physics A· Volume 128· Issue 12

Abstract

When laser micromachining is performed at a non-zero angle of incidence, it is possible to fabricate microstructures with tilted sidewalls that could not be achieved using a perpendicular beam. In this report, we examine the influence of the angle of incidence (0–70°), feature size and spacing (10–150 µm), lens focal length (25 and 100 mm), and spot radius (15–50 µm) on the minimum achievable feature width ((W_{{{ ext{half}}}})) of periodic arrays of square micropillars. A new empirical model is developed that is applicable to both flat and tilted substrates, and accurately predicts the pillar height as a function of the feature width. By comparing structures inscribed at different tilt angles, we found that when the angle of incidence is increased (W_{{{ ext{half}}}}) also rises, such that it becomes more difficult to fabricate thin microstructures on angled substrates. Based on this knowledge, we establish a correlation that predicts (W_{{{ ext{half}}}}) as a function of the angle of incidence and the beam’s spot radius. Therewith, we can predict the minimum feature width that can be achieved over a wide range of laser processing parameters, with an average error of only 4.5% within the bounds of this investigation. Finally, by testing lenses with different focal lengths, we found that a shorter focal length reduces (W_{{{ ext{half}}}}) (improves the spatial resolution) when the angle of incidence is zero, but increases (W_{{{ ext{half}}}}) when the angle of incidence is high. We attribute this discrepancy to the angular spread of the beam cone, which can interact significantly with adjacent pillars, leading to degradation of the intended microstructure and a reduction in pillar height.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. L. Overmeyer, J.F. Duesing, O. Suttmann, U. Stute, Laser patterning of thin film sensors on 3-D surfaces. CIRP Ann. 61, 215–218 (2012)10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.087 ↗
2. X.H. Wang, P. Lai, H.W. Choi, Laser micromachining of optical microstructures with inclined sidewall profile. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27, 1048–1052 (2009)10.1116/1.3117344 ↗
3. M. Hajri, P. Börner, K. Wegener, An industry-relevant method to determine material-specific parameters for ultra-short pulsed laser ablation of cemented carbide. Procedia CIRP 74, 709–713 (2018)10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.036 ↗
4. P. Börner, M. Hajri, T. Wahl, J. Weixler, K. Wegener, Picosecond pulsed laser ablation of dielectric rods: angle-dependent ablation process model for laser micromachining. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 234902 (2019)10.1063/1.5092812 ↗
5. Y. Tuo, H. Zhang, W. Rong, S. Jiang, W. Chen, X. Liu, Drag reduction of anisotropic superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by laser etching. Langmuir 35, 11016–11022 (2019)10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01040 ↗
6. D.C. Emmony, R.P. Howson, L.J. Willis, Laser mirror damage in germanium at 10.6 Μm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 23, 598–600 (1973)10.1063/1.1654761 ↗
7. S. Nolte, C. Momma, G. Kamlage, A. Ostendorf, C. Fallnich, F. Von Alvensleben, H. Welling, Polarization effects in ultrashort-pulse laser drilling. Appl. Phys. A 68, 563–567 (1999)10.1007/s003390050941 ↗
8. E.J.Y. Ling, J. Saïd, N. Brodusch, R. Gauvin, P. Servio, A.-M. Kietzig, Investigating and understanding the effects of multiple femtosecond laser scans on the surface topography of stainless steel 304 and titanium. Appl. Surf. Sci. 353, 512–521 (2015)10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.137 ↗
9. G. Kravanja, I.A. Belyaeva, L. Hribar, I. Drevenšek-Olenik, M. Shamonin, M. Jezeršek, Laser micromachining of magnetoactive elastomers as enabling technology for magnetoresponsive surfaces. Adv. Mater. Technol. 7, 2101045 (2021)10.1002/admt.202101045 ↗
10. M.J. Hancock, K. Sekeroglu, M.C. Demirel, Bioinspired directional surfaces for adhesion, wetting, and transport. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 2223–2234 (2012)10.1002/adfm.201103017 ↗
11. J. Yong, F. Chen, Y. Fang, J. Huo, Q. Yang, J. Zhang, H. Bian, X. Hou, Bioinspired design of underwater superaerophobic and superaerophilic surfaces by femtosecond laser ablation for anti-or capturing bubbles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 39863–39871 (2017)10.1021/acsami.7b14819 ↗
12. J. Noh, J.-H. Lee, S. Na, H. Lim, D.-H. Jung, Fabrication of hierarchically micro-and nano-structured mold surfaces using laser ablation for mass production of superhydrophobic surfaces. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 106502 (2010)10.1143/JJAP.49.106502 ↗
13. B. Neuenschwander, B. Jaeggi, M. Schmid, V. Rouffiange, P.-E. Martin, G. Hennig, Optimization of the volume ablation rate for metals at different laser pulse-durations from Ps to Fs. Proc. SPIE 8243, 824307 (2012)10.1117/12.908583 ↗
14. J. Lehr, A.-M. Kietzig, Production of homogenous micro-structures by femtosecond laser micro-machining. Opt. Lasers Eng. 57, 121–129 (2014)10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.01.012 ↗
15. D.-M. Chun, G. Davaasuren, C.-V. Ngo, C.-S. Kim, G.-Y. Lee, S.-H. Ahn, Fabrication of transparent superhydrophobic surface on thermoplastic polymer using laser beam machining and compression molding for mass production. CIRP Ann. 63, 525–528 (2014)10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.085 ↗
16. G. Davaasuren, C.-V. Ngo, H.-S. Oh, D.-M. Chun, Geometric study of transparent superhydrophobic surfaces of molded and grid patterned polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Appl. Surf. Sci. 314, 530–536 (2014)10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.170 ↗
17. A. Borowiec, H.K. Haugen, Femtosecond laser micromachining of grooves in indium phosphide. Appl. Phys. A 79, 521–529 (2004)10.1007/s00339-003-2377-0 ↗